Z175BBC sport In Reading's case, they admitted the first charge of failure to control their players and were fined £25,000 and "warned as to their future conduct."
The club denied the second charge but an independent regulatory commission found the charge proven and fined Reading a further £10,000.
They were also ordered to pay a £5,000 fine suspended from a previous hearing, which was to be invoked if the Royals committed a similar breach before the end of next season.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/footbal ... 387145.stm
This makes more sense now as £25,000 seems more appropriate.
I wonder what the second charge was though? We need better lawyers!
And can anyone remember the previous breach?
The second charge was the fracas in the tunnel after the match - they denied it which was odd, as there was no doubt it actually happened and they were involved. They should have pleaded guilty but with with mitigating circumstances (provocation).
Previous breach was away at Swansea last season.