by Simon's Church » 11 Jan 2012 11:57
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Jan 2012 11:58
Simon's Church Won't we have to pay some kind of compensation as he's under 24? Not that it'll be much anyway.
by M-U-R-T-Y » 11 Jan 2012 11:59
Hoop BlahM-U-R-T-Y I'd have thought you would trust McD's judgement and give him a chance first. He definitely has a promising background, more so than any other gamble we've taken.
I do trust McDermott's judgment but he's not infallible and I'm just realistic enough to realise that these signings are gambles, and gambles that don't often come off.
by FiNeRaIn » 11 Jan 2012 12:00
winchester_royalFiNeRaInwinchester_royal Highly rated by Rovers fans, spent 3 years in the Everton academy, scored goals in Europe, 9 goals in 23 games last season, key player in a championship winning team, and still only 20.
Yet some still decide to write him off without having seen him play.
This fails to ignore the standard the goals were scored against. I'd actually be quite happy with the signing tbh but lets not dress the irish league and the woeful teams standard of the europa league up to be something its not.
This is the same standard of Europa teams that Tottenham couldn't get through against?
by Simon's Church » 11 Jan 2012 12:06
Wycombe RoyalSimon's Church Won't we have to pay some kind of compensation as he's under 24? Not that it'll be much anyway.
Don't think so as it is an international transfer.
by Bandini » 11 Jan 2012 12:06
Extended-PhenotypeTokyo Sex Whale We wont keep on getting lucky ala Doyle/Long.
Still laughing at the notion we "keep getting lucky". Like I said, Doyle/Long were signed 7 years ago.
by Tilehurst End » 11 Jan 2012 12:09
TBM The two Williams that he signed worked out well, i'll give McD that.....
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Jan 2012 12:14
by M-U-R-T-Y » 11 Jan 2012 12:21
by Extended-Phenotype » 11 Jan 2012 12:34
by floyd__streete » 11 Jan 2012 12:39
melonhead at the cost, it hardly matters does it?
hes free for instance, and wages will not be a problem
so he could end up more bennet than doyle, and we'd still probably make a profit on him
by LoyalRoyalFan » 11 Jan 2012 12:40
by roadrunner » 11 Jan 2012 12:59
floyd__streetemelonhead at the cost, it hardly matters does it?
hes free for instance, and wages will not be a problem
so he could end up more bennet than doyle, and we'd still probably make a profit on him
But this is an absolute crock isn't it?
If we're wasting wages on Baseya and perhaps this fella too - peppercorn as they may be - we're not using the finance towards paying a decent wage to a player who is fit for purpose.
by FiNeRaIn » 11 Jan 2012 13:03
roadrunner
It's better than throwing millions at so called big names that don't perform and we still bob around the Championship, only with less money in our pockets and a huge wage bill.
by roadrunner » 11 Jan 2012 13:07
FiNeRaInroadrunner
It's better than throwing millions at so called big names that don't perform and we still bob around the Championship, only with less money in our pockets and a huge wage bill.
What about the big names that DO perform... as their success rate is generally higher than unproven imports with no experience?
I'll stress again I don't mind this signing, baseya was a stupid one but this lad looks a better option. Really makes me laugh how people bust out the overpaid big names all being crap scenario and the cheap imports proving us all wrong as bargains. The reality is proven players whether paid more or not have a higher success rate...because they are proven.
by Svlad Cjelli » 11 Jan 2012 13:08
FiNeRaInroadrunner
It's better than throwing millions at so called big names that don't perform and we still bob around the Championship, only with less money in our pockets and a huge wage bill.
What about the big names that DO perform... as their success rate is generally higher than unproven imports with no experience?
I'll stress again I don't mind this signing, baseya was a stupid one but this lad looks a better option. Really makes me laugh how people bust out the overpaid big names all being crap scenario and the cheap imports proving us all wrong as bargains. The reality is proven players whether paid more or not have a higher success rate...because they are proven.
by FiNeRaIn » 11 Jan 2012 13:20
by Svlad Cjelli » 11 Jan 2012 13:23
FiNeRaIn Thats an awful lise, for a start cisse was bought as an unknown quantity and did actually do alright for us... certainly doesn't tick either box. Marek had poor players with bad movement/awareness around him so was unable to fit in. Kitson is a silly addition as is ferdinand and keown who were about 38 when signed. Other than that Fae/Halford both agreed.
Harper/Sidwell/convey/butler/cureton/salako/forster/little,etc were all biggish/proven names when signed who turned out to be successful for the club.
RE last bit, of course...no one was suggesting anyone was crap.
by melonhead » 11 Jan 2012 13:31
floyd__streetemelonhead at the cost, it hardly matters does it?
hes free for instance, and wages will not be a problem
so he could end up more bennet than doyle, and we'd still probably make a profit on him
But this is an absolute crock isn't it?
If we're wasting wages on Baseya and perhaps this fella too - peppercorn as they may be - we're not using the finance towards paying a decent wage to a player who is fit for purpose.
by FiNeRaIn » 11 Jan 2012 13:31
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Plymouth exile and 199 guests