by Uke » 09 May 2013 14:16
by LightwaterRoyal » 09 May 2013 15:21
by andrew1957 » 09 May 2013 16:42
by Uke » 09 May 2013 16:44
by andrew1957 » 09 May 2013 16:49
Uke When do "size" and "strength" become "weight" and "turning circle of an oil tanker"?
by Jano » 09 May 2013 16:54
by under the tin » 09 May 2013 17:01
by Royalclapper » 09 May 2013 17:13
by YateleyRoyal » 09 May 2013 17:20
Royalclapper Lolz at people saying he's class and he will come good once he drops down a division.
by Jano » 09 May 2013 17:30
Royalclapper Lolz at people saying he's class and he will come good once he drops down a division.
by Uke » 09 May 2013 17:32
JanoRoyalclapper Lolz at people saying he's class and he will come good once he drops down a division.
I think he's class no matter the division, it's more to do with the style the team is being asked to play and the role he's being asked to perform in that team. Under McDermott he was being asked to play an unfamiliar role, and one he was blatantly not suited to.
by Jano » 09 May 2013 17:34
UkeJanoRoyalclapper Lolz at people saying he's class and he will come good once he drops down a division.
I think he's class no matter the division, it's more to do with the style the team is being asked to play and the role he's being asked to perform in that team. Under McDermott he was being asked to play an unfamiliar role, and one he was blatantly not suited to.
So the other 10 on the pitch are the ones marching out of step?
by Uke » 09 May 2013 18:09
by peterroyal76 » 09 May 2013 18:32
under the tin Nah, it seems to me that some are taking the bloke's reputation over what has actually been produced on the pitch.
The Steve Moran comparison is a very well made observation.
In the several decades that I have been following this club, I have seen many strikers.
Pog does not have the pace of a Nicky Forster.
He does not have the aerial prescence or ability of a Jimmy Quinn
He does not have the tricky feet of a Dean Horrix
He does not have the ability to hold the ball up of a Dave Kitson
He does not have the predatorial eye for a goal of a Trevor Senior
Ok, you can argue that these players are from a different era and level. Given.
I'm just trying to work out what this bloke, who is reputedly the highest paid player on the books, is supposed to be to justify that level of remuneration.
by mumbo-jumbo » 09 May 2013 19:13
by Mid Sussex Royal » 09 May 2013 19:57
peterroyal76under the tin Nah, it seems to me that some are taking the bloke's reputation over what has actually been produced on the pitch.
The Steve Moran comparison is a very well made observation.
In the several decades that I have been following this club, I have seen many strikers.
Pog does not have the pace of a Nicky Forster.
He does not have the aerial prescence or ability of a Jimmy Quinn
He does not have the tricky feet of a Dean Horrix
He does not have the ability to hold the ball up of a Dave Kitson
He does not have the predatorial eye for a goal of a Trevor Senior
Ok, you can argue that these players are from a different era and level. Given.
I'm just trying to work out what this bloke, who is reputedly the highest paid player on the books, is supposed to be to justify that level of remuneration.
As you say all of these had different attributes, but they all had one thing in common....if they had all the attributes you least neither would have EVER played for Reading.
by TBM » 09 May 2013 22:28
LightwaterRoyal Pogrebnyak is a quality footballer who has lacked service and still managed to put in positive performances.
thread/
by under the tin » 10 May 2013 08:16
Mid Sussex Royalpeterroyal76under the tin Nah, it seems to me that some are taking the bloke's reputation over what has actually been produced on the pitch.
The Steve Moran comparison is a very well made observation.
In the several decades that I have been following this club, I have seen many strikers.
Pog does not have the pace of a Nicky Forster.
He does not have the aerial prescence or ability of a Jimmy Quinn
He does not have the tricky feet of a Dean Horrix
He does not have the ability to hold the ball up of a Dave Kitson
He does not have the predatorial eye for a goal of a Trevor Senior
Ok, you can argue that these players are from a different era and level. Given.
I'm just trying to work out what this bloke, who is reputedly the highest paid player on the books, is supposed to be to justify that level of remuneration.
As you say all of these had different attributes, but they all had one thing in common....if they had all the attributes you least neither would have EVER played for Reading.
Hard to make comparisons as out of those only Forster and Kitson did it for us at championship level - Senior and Horrix were successful third/forth tier strikers, and Quinn didn't pull up any trees in the championship - not for us anyway.
by M Brook » 10 May 2013 10:06
under the tin Nah, it seems to me that some are taking the bloke's reputation over what has actually been produced on the pitch.
The Steve Moran comparison is a very well made observation.
In the several decades that I have been following this club, I have seen many strikers.
Pog does not have the pace of a Nicky Forster.
He does not have the aerial prescence or ability of a Jimmy Quinn
He does not have the tricky feet of a Dean Horrix
He does not have the ability to hold the ball up of a Dave Kitson
He does not have the predatorial eye for a goal of a Trevor Senior
Ok, you can argue that these players are from a different era and level. Given.
I'm just trying to work out what this bloke, who is reputedly the highest paid player on the books, is supposed to be to justify that level of remuneration.
by winchester_royal » 10 May 2013 10:09
Uke When do "size" and "strength" become "weight" and "turning circle of an oil tanker"?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 160 guests