Snowflake Royal muirinho Snowflake Royal If you go to whoscored.com and select our game, then Bodin and pass accuracy, you can select key passes. All three of his came second half.
You can also go into the chalkboard, select Bodin and look at crosses. Most were second half.
So yeah, the stats would be more in your support than RB's and anyone with eyes knows Gunter rarely gets tight.
You don't need to put in crosses if you're being given the freedom of the county to go where you like. Bodin ran rings around Richards and QPRs best chance was a first half shot from him. If Blackett had played like that he'd have been booed off.
Also if you're going to use whoscored stats, maybe you should have a closer look.
Richards (45) Tackles 0. Interceptions 0. Clearances 1
Gunter (90) Tackles 3. Interceptions 3. Clearances 9.
If we were talking about tackles and clearances I might. Incidentally we're talking about Preston not QPR and I most certainly would not have been booing Blackett off.
Also, seeing as we're talking about stats, tackles and interceptions don't measure whether you are getting beaten regularly, "was dribbled" does. FYI, according to the stats neither Richards nor Gunter were. As for tackles and interceptions, Gunter made one second half tackle, not three, and two interceptions.
I think Clement made a good call. Richards was just back from injury and inexperienced and they targetted him. His big problem wasn't playing badly, it was Barrow doing absolutely nothing to help so it was often 2 on 1.
You'll note that Bodin got no more shots away first half than second. If he was going passed Richards with ease as you suggest I'd expect more.
Letting in cross after cross is not really any better than getting beaten repeatedly anyway.
My point was that it is silly to use a single stat or "characteristic" to rate a player. All players do some things well and some things not so well in any game. Some of that is ingrained through early coaching, some of it is natural ability or inclination, some of it is as a result of tactics.
In addition the sort of stats available on whoscored and the like are very clumsy, and aren't as good as actual proper analysis. According to whoscored, Gunter was the second-best player on the pitch on Saturday. Do you believe that? If not, why use anything from there? Incidentally whoscored says Richards
was dispossessed (and that is true, because I saw it virtually in front of me), so if you are using a different site that says he wasn't, then even the stats sites disagree with each other.
Clement has clearly simplified what the fullbacks are meant to be doing, and has told them to defend narrow, and stop runs into the box. The central defenders are supposed to defend against the crosses. Ilori and Moore were eating up crosses all game - as far as I am concerned this method is working.
Did Gunter do a good defensive job on Saturday? Yes, yes he did (although I certainly wouldn't rate him as the second best player out there!!!) unless the one and only metric you use is something that the current coach seemingly doesn't regard as that important right now anyway. (nor is it something he's ever been much cop at, and yet has made a very decent career without it - perhaps it's not as important as some on here seem to think)
Richards was struggling because he's less experienced at playing in different systems, and had got a different set of instructions than he had from Stam, and also because he's clearly not yet match fit. His first 20 minutes were horrible, but Liam Moore coached him through the rest of the half, and Kelly came over that side more frequently to help out. But that meant their own games were complicated by having to worry about Richards, which they didn't need to do in the second half. I also suspect that Gunter was better at shouting at Barrow!
Good learning experience, and I'm sure he will be better next game, but we agree it was the right decision to haul him off at half time. My original beef was with the suggestion that he shouldn't have been subbed, seemingly based just on Gunter backing off crosses.