NewCorkSethFranchise FCMillsy
I am a fierce advocate for VAR, even with its problems.
But I can totally see where you're coming from. The implementation is awful at the moment.
The type of VAR I've always advocated has always been the type you suggest i.e. a strict number of reviews (3 max?) requested by a captain, perhaps if they're vindicated it won't drop the number, or maybe not even as typically you don't get more than 3 really bad BIG decisions per team per game anyway. THat would definitely help.
My friends who watch every Liverpool game complain about goals not given for being mm offside and I take that criticism as no system is perfect. But what we're talking about here is the lesser of two evils. 2 of the pens we had couldn't be more blatant and there's no way one of those wouldn't be given on VAR review.
There are definitely issues with it as it stands but even as it stands it's better than no VAR. But yes it needs to be done better.
The offside thing is so easy to resolve though. I suggested a 20 second time window, and think it may have been OMA that suggested 30 seconds, but if you can't tell in that time, it's not offside. Millimetres become much less relevant.
That is actually a good idea. It should only take 20-30 seconds max to tell whether the player is offside enough to have gained an unfair advantage.
A players armpit being marginally offside is not in the spirit of the law.
I’ve taken a screen shot of that - my good idea for 2020 (although fair do’s I have to share the spoils with OMA)