Kitson and irony

141 posts
pearcetom
Member
Posts: 198
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 22:13

by pearcetom » 13 Aug 2007 21:01

Smoking Kills Dancing Doe I hope Kits twated Guillt. Ok it was a red card, but Guillt basically implied that Kits was trying to hurt Evra, which is a fookin disgrace.


he is a oxf*rd! in the sun it said that they had an argument in the tunnel after the game and he told kitson to start playing football properly....so kitson told him to mind his own business :)

Kes

by Kes » 13 Aug 2007 21:03

It was a reckless challenge - You can't really argue Kitson was sent off. The refs opinion is the one that matters and he made the decision to send him off. I can appreciate arguements for both sides. Another ref on another day may have only issued a yellow. It was borderline.

People are entitled to their opinions in football and that's what Ruud Gullit was there for yesterday. So for Kitson (if its the case) to get upset over Gullits comments is a bit silly. Jamie Redknapp defended Kitson though - so the studio was even divided on the incident.

Behindu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1970
Joined: 01 Mar 2007 15:05

by Behindu » 13 Aug 2007 21:13

Kes People are entitled to their opinions in football and that's what Ruud Gullit was there for yesterday. So for Kitson (if its the case) to get upset over Gullits comments is a bit silly.


By the sounds of it Kits wasn;t reacting to any comments made on TV. If Gullit did indeed approach Kits and offer him 'advice' of this sort then Kits has every right to tell him where to stick his advice. It would have been totally out of order for Gullit to talk to Kits in that way and at that time.

Kes

by Kes » 13 Aug 2007 21:14

Behindu
Kes People are entitled to their opinions in football and that's what Ruud Gullit was there for yesterday. So for Kitson (if its the case) to get upset over Gullits comments is a bit silly.


By the sounds of it Kits wasn;t reacting to any comments made on TV. If Gullit did indeed approach Kits and offer him 'advice' of this sort then Kits has every right to tell him where to stick his advice. It would have been totally out of order for Gullit to talk to Kits in that way and at that time.


If Gullit did approach Kitson and comment on his 'tackle' :shock: after the game, then that is out of order!

Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

by Royalee » 13 Aug 2007 21:39

Just seen an identical tackle booked in the Peterborough Southampton match...


size 12
Member
Posts: 124
Joined: 20 May 2004 19:07
Location: 93rd!

by size 12 » 13 Aug 2007 21:43

That red card has been coming for about two years.

Why does Kitson make those mad lunges in those areas (ie 70 yards from our goal). Utterly needless

Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

by Royalee » 13 Aug 2007 21:44

size 12 That red card has been coming for about two years.

Why does Kitson make those mad lunges in those areas (ie 70 yards from our goal). Utterly needless


Yes, ban him from trying to tackle players and blocking clearances.

Rooney made about three of those challenges yesterday but our defenders got out of the way and didn't roll around like babies for half an hour. :roll:

User avatar
premiership_bound
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: 27 Apr 2004 13:16
Location: The Catherine Wheel, Newbury

by premiership_bound » 13 Aug 2007 22:55

Royalee Just seen an identical tackle booked in the Peterborough Southampton match...


I saw that. 'Twas identical but only a yellow.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22012
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

by Royal Rother » 13 Aug 2007 23:26

Entirely identical eh? :lol:


Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

by Royalee » 13 Aug 2007 23:37

Royal Rother Entirely identical eh? :lol:


The one in the Southampton game was, the recipient just didn't roll around for half an hour like Evra.

g
Member
Posts: 494
Joined: 19 Jul 2007 17:01

by g » 13 Aug 2007 23:55

Must be a trait inherited from being French

readingfc_4_life_and_beyo
Member
Posts: 309
Joined: 24 Aug 2004 19:10
Location: Thatcham!!!

by readingfc_4_life_and_beyo » 14 Aug 2007 00:17

g Must be a trait inherited from being French

You are Spacey AICMFP

papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

by papereyes » 14 Aug 2007 00:54

Behindu
soggy biscuit
Behindu Oster's foot was off the ground for the freekick in the 94th minute. Was that considered to be 'controlled' and therefore not a red (or even a yellow ?)


Did Oster's foot make contact with the player, as I stated had to happen for it to be a red card?


Massive change in the laws then - it has always been seen that an offence was treated the same whether contact was made or not - red card for striking or attempting to strike a player for example. Players were not 'let off' becasue they were not good enough to connect with their attempted strike !!

From memory I think Oster's foot did make contact, although only with the raised foot of Evra !


An attempted foul has always been punished the same as a foul. By the rule book, that is.


papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

by papereyes » 14 Aug 2007 00:55

Kes It was a reckless challenge - You can't really argue Kitson was sent off. The refs opinion is the one that matters and he made the decision to send him off. I can appreciate arguements for both sides. Another ref on another day may have only issued a yellow. It was borderline.

People are entitled to their opinions in football and that's what Ruud Gullit was there for yesterday. So for Kitson (if its the case) to get upset over Gullits comments is a bit silly. Jamie Redknapp defended Kitson though - so the studio was even divided on the incident.


LOL

transparent

papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

by papereyes » 14 Aug 2007 00:56

size 12 That red card has been coming for about two years.

Why does Kitson make those mad lunges in those areas (ie 70 yards from our goal). Utterly needless


Man City 0 Reading 2

Kits set at one of those up with a mad tackle.

papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

by papereyes » 14 Aug 2007 00:57

Kes
Behindu
Kes People are entitled to their opinions in football and that's what Ruud Gullit was there for yesterday. So for Kitson (if its the case) to get upset over Gullits comments is a bit silly.


By the sounds of it Kits wasn;t reacting to any comments made on TV. If Gullit did indeed approach Kits and offer him 'advice' of this sort then Kits has every right to tell him where to stick his advice. It would have been totally out of order for Gullit to talk to Kits in that way and at that time.


If Gullit did approach Kitson and comment on his 'tackle' :shock: after the game, then that is out of order!


According to a mate, they *bumped* into each other after the game.

Readingfc50
Member
Posts: 127
Joined: 14 May 2005 09:41
Location: yateley

by Readingfc50 » 14 Aug 2007 01:14

size 12 That red card has been coming for about two years.

Why does Kitson make those mad lunges in those areas (ie 70 yards from our goal). Utterly needless


because hes been getting away with it for the past 2 years

User avatar
bigmike
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1497
Joined: 23 Sep 2004 00:33

by bigmike » 14 Aug 2007 08:36

papereyes
Kes
Behindu
Kes People are entitled to their opinions in football and that's what Ruud Gullit was there for yesterday. So for Kitson (if its the case) to get upset over Gullits comments is a bit silly.


By the sounds of it Kits wasn;t reacting to any comments made on TV. If Gullit did indeed approach Kits and offer him 'advice' of this sort then Kits has every right to tell him where to stick his advice. It would have been totally out of order for Gullit to talk to Kits in that way and at that time.


If Gullit did approach Kitson and comment on his 'tackle' :shock: after the game, then that is out of order!


According to a mate, they *bumped* into each other after the game.


Bumped to each other after the game... What was Ruud Chelsea fan Gullit doing in the tunnell?

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

by Hoop Blah » 14 Aug 2007 09:19

Royalee
Royal Rother Entirely identical eh? :lol:


The one in the Southampton game was, the recipient just didn't roll around for half an hour like Evra.


I don't think Evra really holds any blame for the red card to be fair to him.

Styles had already whipped out his card and was waving it around before Evra even hit the deck.

papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

by papereyes » 14 Aug 2007 09:56

bigmike
papereyes
Kes
Behindu
Kes People are entitled to their opinions in football and that's what Ruud Gullit was there for yesterday. So for Kitson (if its the case) to get upset over Gullits comments is a bit silly.


By the sounds of it Kits wasn;t reacting to any comments made on TV. If Gullit did indeed approach Kits and offer him 'advice' of this sort then Kits has every right to tell him where to stick his advice. It would have been totally out of order for Gullit to talk to Kits in that way and at that time.


If Gullit did approach Kitson and comment on his 'tackle' :shock: after the game, then that is out of order!


According to a mate, they *bumped* into each other after the game.


Bumped to each other after the game... What was Ruud Chelsea fan Gullit doing in the tunnell?


Who said anything about a tunnel? Some post-match hospitality suite somewhere, I guess.

141 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 486 guests

It is currently 11 Mar 2025 04:59