by Amongst the sheep » 15 Jan 2008 20:35
by Royalwaster » 15 Jan 2008 20:36
MiniRoyalRow Z RoyalIan Royal A couple of weeks ago people were having a go at Coppell for only ever playing 4-4-2
It's just like Football Manager.
I certainly recall someone demanding he try playing Long on the wing. I guess that by the end of the night we'll have some idea of Pearce's ability since Spurs are out to win the cup.
by Victor Meldrew » 15 Jan 2008 20:42
PEARCEYVictor MeldrewPEARCEYPlatypuss OS is saying:
Live updates - Reading vs Spurs
Posted on: Tue 15 Jan 2008
Reading 0
Spurs 0
Reading (5-4-1): Federici; Rosenior, De La Cruz, Cisse, Ingimarsson, Pearce; Harper, Shorey, Long, Convey; Lita
Subs: Hahnemann, Henry, Hunt, Cox, Doyle
Is that the special formation designed to combat Berbatov?
Lost by this formation...presumably Rosenior is left back, DLC right back with three centre halves. Shorey is left midfield??!!! Convey right side...Long..oh bollocks I cannot see how this will work out.
How simple do you want it?
5 at the back means 3 centre-backs plus 2 wing-backs.
What a physical midfield 4-ideal to play Man Utd away when we get through?
All very well you saying that clever dick but seeing Shorey in midfield and Long out wide is not the norm is it.
by seahawk10 » 15 Jan 2008 20:49
hiroseahawk10 I really want us to play 4-4-2. I hope we are not going with the overly defensive 4-5-1 or even worse 5-4-1. Let's attack! We have nothing to lose!!!
(apart from the game)
Exactly.
We are one goal down, and have we changed the formation back to 4-4-2 yet? Let's fight back!
by Archie's penalty » 15 Jan 2008 20:49
by PremAddict » 15 Jan 2008 20:52
seahawk10hiroseahawk10 I really want us to play 4-4-2. I hope we are not going with the overly defensive 4-5-1 or even worse 5-4-1. Let's attack! We have nothing to lose!!!
(apart from the game)
Exactly.
We are one goal down, and have we changed the formation back to 4-4-2 yet? Let's fight back!
Hiro, are you listening on your Reading World subscription?
by PEARCEY » 15 Jan 2008 20:53
MiniRoyalRow Z RoyalIan Royal A couple of weeks ago people were having a go at Coppell for only ever playing 4-4-2
It's just like Football Manager.
I certainly recall someone demanding he try playing Long on the wing. I guess that by the end of the night we'll have some idea of Pearce's ability since Spurs are out to win the cup.
by PremAddict » 15 Jan 2008 20:53
PremAddictseahawk10hiroseahawk10 I really want us to play 4-4-2. I hope we are not going with the overly defensive 4-5-1 or even worse 5-4-1. Let's attack! We have nothing to lose!!!
(apart from the game)
Exactly.
We are one goal down, and have we changed the formation back to 4-4-2 yet? Let's fight back!
Hiro, are you listening on your Reading World subscription?
I couldn't get any sound although WMP was showing a stream. Anyone else listening from World. Tried Match Console too and same thing - no sound. BBC only works inside the UK.
by seahawk10 » 15 Jan 2008 20:53
PremAddictseahawk10hiroseahawk10 I really want us to play 4-4-2. I hope we are not going with the overly defensive 4-5-1 or even worse 5-4-1. Let's attack! We have nothing to lose!!!
(apart from the game)
Exactly.
We are one goal down, and have we changed the formation back to 4-4-2 yet? Let's fight back!
Hiro, are you listening on your Reading World subscription?
I couldn't get any sound although WMP was showing a stream. Anyone else listening from World. Tried Match Console too and same thing - no sound. BBC only works inside the UK.
by Ian Royal » 15 Jan 2008 20:55
PEARCEYMiniRoyalRow Z RoyalIan Royal A couple of weeks ago people were having a go at Coppell for only ever playing 4-4-2
It's just like Football Manager.
I certainly recall someone demanding he try playing Long on the wing. I guess that by the end of the night we'll have some idea of Pearce's ability since Spurs are out to win the cup.
I did...Long has pace so lets see if he can use it. I did not demand it though...it was just a suggestion.
by PEARCEY » 15 Jan 2008 20:55
Archie's penalty My 1,000th post - come on the rrrzzz's in the second half!!!
It could have been negative but it wasn't
by PremAddict » 15 Jan 2008 20:57
seahawk10PremAddictseahawk10hiroseahawk10 I really want us to play 4-4-2. I hope we are not going with the overly defensive 4-5-1 or even worse 5-4-1. Let's attack! We have nothing to lose!!!
(apart from the game)
Exactly.
We are one goal down, and have we changed the formation back to 4-4-2 yet? Let's fight back!
Hiro, are you listening on your Reading World subscription?
I couldn't get any sound although WMP was showing a stream. Anyone else listening from World. Tried Match Console too and same thing - no sound. BBC only works inside the UK.
Do you have a link to the stream? I will take anything at this point!!!
by higher » 15 Jan 2008 20:57
by Ian Royal » 15 Jan 2008 20:58
by Archie's penalty » 15 Jan 2008 20:59
PEARCEYArchie's penalty My 1,000th post - come on the rrrzzz's in the second half!!!
It could have been negative but it wasn't
Congrats Mr Penalty..you are a good contributor on here (apart from those RTG's!!!)
by seahawk10 » 15 Jan 2008 20:59
PremAddictseahawk10PremAddictseahawk10hiroseahawk10 I really want us to play 4-4-2. I hope we are not going with the overly defensive 4-5-1 or even worse 5-4-1. Let's attack! We have nothing to lose!!!
(apart from the game)
Exactly.
We are one goal down, and have we changed the formation back to 4-4-2 yet? Let's fight back!
Hiro, are you listening on your Reading World subscription?
I couldn't get any sound although WMP was showing a stream. Anyone else listening from World. Tried Match Console too and same thing - no sound. BBC only works inside the UK.
Do you have a link to the stream? I will take anything at this point!!!
Just PM'd you the link - hope it works!
by Archie's penalty » 15 Jan 2008 21:00
higher For Sale. Barn door used for shooting practice. Mint condition. Offers to L Lita,Reading Football Club.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1014 guests