by Sir Rodger Doyle » 10 Feb 2008 22:41
by weybridgewanderer » 13 Feb 2008 17:08
Sir Rodger Doyle Bighting the hand that feeds?
Do you honestly think the PL gives a sh*t what we think?
They are talking about playing games on the other side of the world after all.
Next logical step is to stage matches at an acceptable time for world wide armchair fans.
9.00pm kick off anyone?
by weybridgewanderer » 13 Feb 2008 17:12
AF1Dirk Gently Indeed. If you were to ask any club chairman, Scudamore - or just about anyone involved in Sky, Setanta or the Premier League - their response would be "it's the price you have to pay for getting £50 million a season to buy and pay players. If you want to go back to watching nondescript English players in crumbling stadiums then you're welcome to do that at 3 pm every Saturday."
Where do I sign up?
by Stranded » 14 Feb 2008 09:05
weybridgewandererSir Rodger Doyle Bighting the hand that feeds?
Do you honestly think the PL gives a sh*t what we think?
They are talking about playing games on the other side of the world after all.
Next logical step is to stage matches at an acceptable time for world wide armchair fans.
9.00pm kick off anyone?
The Asian market is bigger to the PL than the US market
The Asian market is not interested in late night games, that is why they prefer the EPL to the champions league.
To further attract that market games will get earlier rather than later.
by Row V » 21 Feb 2008 00:20
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 21 Feb 2008 19:47
although it was revealed that the "estimate" took some rather absurd assumptions to get to that figure - namely that if every single person in the world who had a tv that received the match decided to watch the game, then 1 billion people would be watching. It's a deliberately misleading true statement (as up to 1 billion could in theory be watching), and it's exactly what the NFL does when it makes the same absurd media announcement about the popularity of the superbowl. They rely on people not thinking about what's been said too closely to overstate the popularity of the competition. The true figure was supposed to be more like 80 million.Stranded If you believe the reports as well around a billion people watched the Arsenal-Man Utd game this season - the main reason, a 12.45 Saturday ko making it accessible to the biggest potential tv market.
by Gordons Cumming » 23 Feb 2008 10:34
Row V I don't know what you're all complaining about, 12:30pm on a Sunday is WAY preferable to 7:30am on a Sunday (USA-East coast).
And what about any poor sods on the West Coast - 3:30am!
by Stranded » 23 Feb 2008 15:27
Rev Algenon Stickleback Halthough it was revealed that the "estimate" took some rather absurd assumptions to get to that figure - namely that if every single person in the world who had a tv that received the match decided to watch the game, then 1 billion people would be watching. It's a deliberately misleading true statement (as up to 1 billion could in theory be watching), and it's exactly what the NFL does when it makes the same absurd media announcement about the popularity of the superbowl. They rely on people not thinking about what's been said too closely to overstate the popularity of the competition. The true figure was supposed to be more like 80 million.Stranded If you believe the reports as well around a billion people watched the Arsenal-Man Utd game this season - the main reason, a 12.45 Saturday ko making it accessible to the biggest potential tv market.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Clyde1998, Crusader Royal, Google [Bot], Hendo, Jinx, Orion1871, Snowflake Royal and 1394 guests