by Silver Fox » 28 Jan 2009 09:21
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Jan 2009 09:24
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Jan 2009 09:25
Man Friday was it wise for Leroy to concede that free kick in the last 30 seconds of the match allowing Wolves to have one last-ditch attempt to score?
by OLLIE KEARNS » 28 Jan 2009 09:26
The 17 BusOLLIE KEARNSThe 17 Bus Nothing that a few days of dryer weather wont sort out with the pitch, have said it before the continuall freezing is not good for it at all, it prevents draining.
Can't agree with you their Mr Bus. The lack of grass means that the pitch will always be uneven and covered in divots after 10 minutes of play. Grass holds the surface together and there ain't much of it on our pitch
I think the club has entered into a long term agreement with the egg chasers so they either need a Plan B with the pitch or we're going to see a lot of hoofball over the next few years.
But a lot of the problem is that the last 7 weeks odd has been very cold, so the grass was weaker, and easily lost, ok the Irish will have made it worse from using the pitch, but it would probably have gone anyway.
by OLLIE KEARNS » 28 Jan 2009 09:29
Royal Lady Wolves were acting like THEY were one-up in the last few minutes - they took an age over that throw-in where Collins subsequently got sent off and didn't seem to have any urgency about them. I think they're only where they are in the league through their heavy handedness which was apparent all too often last night - I suppose refs have been ignoring it to some extent, as the ref did last night on too many occasions for my liking - tugging shirts etc, and other lesser teams have capitulated against them.
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2009 09:31
OLLIE KEARNSThe 17 BusOLLIE KEARNS Can't agree with you their Mr Bus. The lack of grass means that the pitch will always be uneven and covered in divots after 10 minutes of play. Grass holds the surface together and there ain't much of it on our pitch
I think the club has entered into a long term agreement with the egg chasers so they either need a Plan B with the pitch or we're going to see a lot of hoofball over the next few years.
But a lot of the problem is that the last 7 weeks odd has been very cold, so the grass was weaker, and easily lost, ok the Irish will have made it worse from using the pitch, but it would probably have gone anyway.
The cold shouldn't be an issue because of the under soil heating and the ongoing use of the ultra violet light machine that stimulates growth. Plus the pitch was knackered by early December which was before the cold snap.
I reckon the egg chasers must be running around a lot more than they used to
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Jan 2009 09:40
OLLIE KEARNSRoyal Lady Wolves were acting like THEY were one-up in the last few minutes - they took an age over that throw-in where Collins subsequently got sent off and didn't seem to have any urgency about them. I think they're only where they are in the league through their heavy handedness which was apparent all too often last night - I suppose refs have been ignoring it to some extent, as the ref did last night on too many occasions for my liking - tugging shirts etc, and other lesser teams have capitulated against them.
Mick Mc was doing his nut over the throw and with Hennessy who took an age to kick the ball from hand whenever he had it late on
by Tilehurst End » 28 Jan 2009 09:40
by Elliott » 28 Jan 2009 09:54
by Sun Tzu » 28 Jan 2009 10:05
loyalroyal4life
Harper would of scored his chance even a year ago!! He just doesnt look the same player!!
by ZacNaloen » 28 Jan 2009 10:09
by OLLIE KEARNS » 28 Jan 2009 10:12
ZacNaloen If Pearce isn't a future Reading captain and defensive legend in the future then I'll eat my hat.
Kelly I thought did his job well, Jarvis was mostly ineffectual and once he was taken off Kelly was allowed to go forward and we saw the excellent attacking abilities.
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2009 10:17
OLLIE KEARNSZacNaloen If Pearce isn't a future Reading captain and defensive legend in the future then I'll eat my hat.
Kelly I thought did his job well, Jarvis was mostly ineffectual and once he was taken off Kelly was allowed to go forward and we saw the excellent attacking abilities.
Jarvis was their only effective player ! Got behind Kelly two or three times in the first half and should have scored in the second half. Kelly did okay against a good player but no more than that.
by ZacNaloen » 28 Jan 2009 10:22
OLLIE KEARNSZacNaloen If Pearce isn't a future Reading captain and defensive legend in the future then I'll eat my hat.
Kelly I thought did his job well, Jarvis was mostly ineffectual and once he was taken off Kelly was allowed to go forward and we saw the excellent attacking abilities.
Jarvis was their only effective player ! Got behind Kelly two or three times in the first half and should have scored in the second half. Kelly did okay against a good player but no more than that.
by Vision » 28 Jan 2009 10:32
ZacNaloenOLLIE KEARNSZacNaloen If Pearce isn't a future Reading captain and defensive legend in the future then I'll eat my hat.
Kelly I thought did his job well, Jarvis was mostly ineffectual and once he was taken off Kelly was allowed to go forward and we saw the excellent attacking abilities.
Jarvis was their only effective player ! Got behind Kelly two or three times in the first half and should have scored in the second half. Kelly did okay against a good player but no more than that.
So he did his job well then?
by Huntley & Palmer » 28 Jan 2009 10:38
by Thomas L'Heureux » 28 Jan 2009 10:42
Huntley & Palmer Pretty much what everyone else has said. My only addition is that their right back seemed to SHunt in his pocket most of the game, sign him up!!!
by The Rouge » 28 Jan 2009 10:45
by bigmike » 28 Jan 2009 10:46
by rabidbee » 28 Jan 2009 10:48
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 204 guests