Yes that is right. The football club is part of Reading Football Club Ltd. However the stadium complex is not owned by that company but by another company Reading FC Holdings Ltd. Two other accountancy points. One is that capital expenditure such as the media suite and training ground do not effect profits. They are merely the result of swapping one asset (cash at bank) with another (the value of the new building) The same applies to the capital cost of players but their wages do reduce profits in a big way. Final point for all those who keep arguing about whether or not funds were made available to SC. JM has always operated a policy of having no fixed transfer budget. Theoretically therefore SC could go to JM and ask for funding for a £10m plus signing. However SC knows that he has to operate within the clubs tight wages policy which means that there is no pont in going for established premier players whose wages exceed the club limit. The reason why SC has not spoken out more on this is simply that the policy was made clear to him at the outset and in taking the job he agreed to operate within those rules.[/quote]
Well Amen to that.
Would it also be correct that this new media suite (which appears to be unexpectedly controversial) could also be considered an asset in the sale of whatever holdings in the club JM decides to sell to a (far eastern) buyer.
Yes that is right. My personal view is that JM is happy to spend money on that sort of thing as it increases the fixed assets and thereby the value of his shares. Money spent on buying a player does reflect in a balance sheet asset but depending on the players age etc may have to be written off over the contract period if they on a Bosman or become worth less because of age. Also their wages certainly do have to be written off against profits and therefore have a negative effect on the share value. If I was JM therefore I would be happier spending money on media suites than players.