by Sarah Star » 06 May 2009 19:39
by handbags_harris » 06 May 2009 19:51
by Jeffers217 » 06 May 2009 20:42
by Royalee » 06 May 2009 22:37
brendywendy except when he did blood pearce of course
by Hoop Blah » 07 May 2009 09:21
SnowballArchAlan Partridge Coppell is the man that despite knowing his left back wanted out and was going played the first 4 matches of the season without a left back. There are many points you can look at as to how and why Reading didn't go on and win this pitiful league but that would be a good place to start. Forest and Charlton, two dire sides took points of Reading in the opening couple of games. Why hadn't a left back joined before the season started?
I don't think that's the right place to look, AP. However mysterious SC's dealings in the transfer market can seem, and notwithstanding the slow start, it's hard to argue that he looked to have got it right by mid-September, and it was still hard to argue with that at Christmas. Like the method of dealing with LB or not, the Armstrong signing worked for us. The first half of the season as a package was evidence of his managerial strengths and the reason why people think he's great. The failure has been all about the second half, and all about Coppell's most manifest weakness which is to fail to motivate a team in a slump. It was Coppell's team that dismantled Swansea and Bristol City in September and essentially the same team that weren't at the races against the same opposition this spring.
Smack on.
Did folks read where Copps said he didn't want to make a big deal of it but they'd been covering up a lot of injuries?
He persisted playing Doyle almost 90 minutes every game and KD eventually broke down/burnt out
The 60-30 share for Hunt/Long now looks like he was playing Hunt as much as he could
Stretch had had very long term injuries and was suspect.
How long was Ingi carrying his problems before it all got too much?
I know all players carry niggles, but...
by CMRoyal » 07 May 2009 09:22
Royaleebrendywendy except when he did blood pearce of course
For a couple of games over Xmas before dropping him based on Duberry's mistakes?
by Royal Rother » 07 May 2009 09:45
by brendywendy » 07 May 2009 10:00
Royaleebrendywendy except when he did blood pearce of course
For a couple of games over Xmas before dropping him based on Duberry's mistakes?
by Snowball » 07 May 2009 13:15
CMRoyalRoyaleebrendywendy except when he did blood pearce of course
For a couple of games over Xmas before dropping him based on Duberry's mistakes?
I don't think that quite tells the full story. I think Pearcee's played in at least a dozen matches this season, and had a run of about 8-10, not a couple. The defence overall was showing signs of creakiness at the time, including mistakes by Doobs, Fed and Alex plus a combination of those players, and SC decided he needed more experience in there. With Ingi injured, that meant Doobs and A N Other. Alex is very unlucky to have lost out to Bikey in that regard. I'm not saying SC is exempt from criticism, but you can see the logic behind the decision. With respect, when you clearly have it in for a manager or player, you need to be a bit more solid in your evidence against them if you don't want people just to dismiss your views as more ill-considered ranting.
by Sun Tzu » 07 May 2009 13:34
by Scarface » 07 May 2009 14:50
by brendywendy » 07 May 2009 15:37
Scarface II've said this before, but ultimately it's the Copppell's car park protester dickheads that cost us this season.
by Snowball » 07 May 2009 16:39
brendywendyScarface II've said this before, but ultimately it's the Copppell's car park protester dickheads that cost us this season.
though it does come to something when you need someone to assign blame to for the heinous crime of getting in the playoffs
by Hoop Blah » 07 May 2009 17:07
Snowball Precisely. We missed auto-promotion by very little in the last game, missed third because of two rebounds.
The team has changed radically from the opening day of the season, and we are ONLY in the play-offs.
It took Wolves three years to put that side together. We started our season with "half the players wanting to leave"
and losing Sonko, Kitson, Shorey... have brought in or brought through Noel Hunt, Armstrong, Pearce, Karacan, Tabb, Kelly
Fourth is not a bad result
by handbags_harris » 07 May 2009 19:51
Hoop BlahSnowball Precisely. We missed auto-promotion by very little in the last game, missed third because of two rebounds.
The team has changed radically from the opening day of the season, and we are ONLY in the play-offs.
It took Wolves three years to put that side together. We started our season with "half the players wanting to leave"
and losing Sonko, Kitson, Shorey... have brought in or brought through Noel Hunt, Armstrong, Pearce, Karacan, Tabb, Kelly
Fourth is not a bad result
Rebounds? Do we play Basketball these days or something?
We missed out on winning the league at a canter, at a time when the other challengers all fell away, by failing to win at home for far too long. We had the chance to walk away with this league if we showed any sort of decent form over the last 3 or 4 months.
It's not the end position that has created the doom, gloom and disappointment with the season it's the abject failure of the team to put together more than 20 minutes of decent football at any time since Christmas.
by Muskrat » 07 May 2009 20:07
by Snowball » 08 May 2009 08:14
by Stranded » 08 May 2009 08:23
Scarface II've said this before, but ultimately it's the Copppell's car park protester dickheads that cost us this season.
Users browsing this forum: From Despair To Where?, Snowflake Royal and 215 guests