Hoop Blah
He did well for that first hour though.
Perhaps we could use him for an hour and then bring on fresh legs for the last 30 ? Seems a reasonable tactic and one that worked well with Little and Convey....
by Sun Tzu » 10 Feb 2010 10:19
Hoop Blah
He did well for that first hour though.
by Hoop Blah » 10 Feb 2010 10:24
Sun TzuHoop Blah
He did well for that first hour though.
Perhaps we could use him for an hour and then bring on fresh legs for the last 30 ? Seems a reasonable tactic and one that worked well with Little and Convey....
by SteveRoyal » 10 Feb 2010 10:25
by Sun Tzu » 10 Feb 2010 10:26
Hoop BlahSun TzuHoop Blah
He did well for that first hour though.
Perhaps we could use him for an hour and then bring on fresh legs for the last 30 ? Seems a reasonable tactic and one that worked well with Little and Convey....
Hmmm...interesting suggestion!
I think that would be a waste of a good substiution, and if like last night you have to take off his midfield partner because they're having a bit of a stinker you're left playing him for 90 minutes and you see the errors creep in and the extra room appear for a half decent opposition midfield to exploit! It could well have cost us last night.
...Convey and Little were perfectly capable of playing 90 minutes that season, as you well know!
by Barry the bird boggler » 10 Feb 2010 10:28
by Comfortably Numb » 10 Feb 2010 10:32
rob9182 Good win, poor game. First goal was a lucky break due to Church closing the ball down and penalty looked a bit dubious but hey ho i'll take it. Mills might find it hard to regain its place as Zurab showed some real class throughout the game. Was disappointed with Karacan again just not as up for it as his usual feisty self, but worst was definitely Howard apart from his freekick didn't really make any impct at all and left all the defending to Gunnarsson.
by papereyes » 10 Feb 2010 10:35
We're currently sat nicely in midtable (OK midtable consists of about 20 clubs this season !) and even Newcastle showed last night that they are beatable and I recall WBA struggling once or twice.
by Silver Fox » 10 Feb 2010 10:35
Barry the bird boggler Though Muffin was poor and Church also struggled. However Long was MotM and Khizanishvili was a class above in his first full appearance (drop Ingi on Saturday and play Mills and Khizanishvili perhaps?)
by Hoop Blah » 10 Feb 2010 10:36
SteveRoyal Someone tell me how Church and Karacan were "poor"?
I'm assuming it's because Church didn't score and Karacan didn't tackle?
Or is it because they just do anything of note?
by Thaumagurist* » 10 Feb 2010 10:36
papereyesWe're currently sat nicely in midtable (OK midtable consists of about 20 clubs this season !) and even Newcastle showed last night that they are beatable and I recall WBA struggling once or twice.
CHRIST
by Tilehurst End » 10 Feb 2010 10:39
SteveRoyal Someone tell me how Church and Karacan were "poor"?
I'm assuming it's because Church didn't score and Karacan didn't tackle?
Or is it because they just do anything of note?
by papereyes » 10 Feb 2010 10:44
Thaumagurist*papereyesWe're currently sat nicely in midtable (OK midtable consists of about 20 clubs this season !) and even Newcastle showed last night that they are beatable and I recall WBA struggling once or twice.
CHRIST
Who wrote that?!?
by Thaumagurist* » 10 Feb 2010 10:47
papereyesThaumagurist*papereyes CHRIST
Who wrote that?!?
Sun Tzu's Art of Bore
by Sarah Star » 10 Feb 2010 10:47
by Sun Tzu » 10 Feb 2010 10:48
papereyesWe're currently sat nicely in midtable (OK midtable consists of about 20 clubs this season !) and even Newcastle showed last night that they are beatable and I recall WBA struggling once or twice.
CHRIST
by Thaumagurist* » 10 Feb 2010 10:50
by John Madejski's Wallet » 10 Feb 2010 10:59
by greenbloodedgirl » 10 Feb 2010 10:59
by Thaumagurist* » 10 Feb 2010 11:04
greenbloodedgirl Personally I disagree with some of the comments on here
greenbloodedgirl Not being biased,
by Maguire » 10 Feb 2010 11:07
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1073 guests