by akranes » 14 Mar 2013 22:36
by AthleticoSpizz » 14 Mar 2013 22:37
by akranes » 14 Mar 2013 22:38
AthleticoSpizz Beckhams a manager?
by AthleticoSpizz » 14 Mar 2013 22:39
by sandman » 14 Mar 2013 22:45
RoyaleeAthleticoSpizz Bill Shankley? whats he doing thesedays?
Why would we want him? He's not a patch on Rodgers.
by AthleticoSpizz » 14 Mar 2013 22:46
by mikey0406 » 14 Mar 2013 23:41
by TBM » 14 Mar 2013 23:55
DivvyLoyalRoyal22 Royal lady .. The tactics we are trying to move on from started with Coppell, would be a terrible choice for manager.
Sorry what? Under Coppell we got promoted and stayed up by playing bloody good football. We had a holding midfielder and a creative midfielder, plus we exposed sides with quality wing play with supporting wing-backs. McDermott's football is nowhere near as good. It's far more workman like, and more direct, making up for a lack of quality in midfield. In fact the two teams cannot be further apart.
by Pepe the Horseman » 15 Mar 2013 01:09
by Millsy » 15 Mar 2013 01:23
mikey0406 over the last 24 hours the big movers in the betting seem to be adkins, advocaat and coppell. I cannot believe that adkins could be seen as a better replacement to brian, nor that the club would go back to Coppell. with dick advocaat being close friends with anton this could have legs....really do not want adkins or di canio...
by AussieRoyal15 » 15 Mar 2013 02:15
by Big Ern » 15 Mar 2013 04:03
by RoyalX » 15 Mar 2013 05:16
2 world wars, 1 world cupmikey0406 over the last 24 hours the big movers in the betting seem to be adkins, advocaat and coppell. I cannot believe that adkins could be seen as a better replacement to brian, nor that the club would go back to Coppell. with dick advocaat being close friends with anton this could have legs....really do not want adkins or di canio...
Sorry can you or anyone for that matter explain why Adkins would be bad? Genuinely confused.
by Royal Monk » 15 Mar 2013 07:36
by Millsy » 15 Mar 2013 08:27
RoyalX2 world wars, 1 world cupmikey0406 over the last 24 hours the big movers in the betting seem to be adkins, advocaat and coppell. I cannot believe that adkins could be seen as a better replacement to brian, nor that the club would go back to Coppell. with dick advocaat being close friends with anton this could have legs....really do not want adkins or di canio...
Sorry can you or anyone for that matter explain why Adkins would be bad? Genuinely confused.
Because it's incredibly difficult to completely change a team's style of play? The Rogers experiment failed, genuinely confused why people think Adkins would be any better.
by Reading4eva » 15 Mar 2013 09:02
by royal_ross » 15 Mar 2013 09:10
by Royal Lady » 15 Mar 2013 09:21
Big Ern Doubt there will be any movement on a new manager until Monday at the earliest, but with a 2 week break after Saturday, might be another week after that or .Reckon Anton & co will allow Dolan to concentrate on the Man Utd game without the distraction of any speculation.
Also looking forward to any manager that happens to be at the game getting linked to the job.
by soggy biscuit » 15 Mar 2013 09:48
by The Rouge » 15 Mar 2013 09:49
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Biscuit goalie, Google [Bot], RoyalBlue, Royals and Racers, Wisconsin Royal and 123 guests