by genome » 30 Sep 2014 23:42
by Royal Lady » 01 Oct 2014 09:25
by Sutekh » 01 Oct 2014 10:29
by Ian Royal » 01 Oct 2014 10:43
Sutekh Well ALF paid the tax bill bill and stopped administration. But the other money would have gone towards the new recruits.
by tidus_mi2 » 01 Oct 2014 10:46
Royal Lady What did we use the money for ALF, McCarthy and Morrison for? Or did that pay our debts? Don't get me wrong, I'm not knocking the Thai consortium (yet lols) but don't make the mistake of thinking it's all THEIR money that has brought in other players - we did get a few million for the three players mentioned...
by Royal Lady » 01 Oct 2014 11:27
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 01 Oct 2014 11:41
Royal Lady So, basically, the Thai's are not the great saviours.....yet. I'm erring on the side of caution here again I'm afraid - time will tell though and I do hope they will be able to help us to improve the team and push on.
by KC Royal » 01 Oct 2014 12:01
by ZacNaloen » 01 Oct 2014 12:04
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 01 Oct 2014 12:17
KC Royal I'm not sure what people expect. We're not going to spend millions when we've got FFP to think about, plus wages of the current playing staff.
Tbh, I've never thought you need to spend loads to succeed in the Championship anyway though.
by Ian Royal » 01 Oct 2014 13:35
Royal Lady So, basically, the Thai's are not the great saviours.....yet. I'm erring on the side of caution here again I'm afraid - time will tell though and I do hope they will be able to help us to improve the team and push on.
by Royal Lady » 01 Oct 2014 14:30
Ian RoyalRoyal Lady So, basically, the Thai's are not the great saviours.....yet. I'm erring on the side of caution here again I'm afraid - time will tell though and I do hope they will be able to help us to improve the team and push on.
The question was have they done anything positive. That statement and being 'great saviours' are entirely different things. No one has said they are great saviours.
Although their involvement has stopped the club going deeper into financial trouble and probably administration / selling off all our decent players.
by winchester_royal » 01 Oct 2014 14:57
Royal LadyIan RoyalRoyal Lady So, basically, the Thai's are not the great saviours.....yet. I'm erring on the side of caution here again I'm afraid - time will tell though and I do hope they will be able to help us to improve the team and push on.
The question was have they done anything positive. That statement and being 'great saviours' are entirely different things. No one has said they are great saviours.
Although their involvement has stopped the club going deeper into financial trouble and probably administration / selling off all our decent players.
Yeah and your contribution was : they allowed us to purchase some players. My view is that we got money in from other players which would have countered that outlay.
by JIM » 01 Oct 2014 16:36
by tidus_mi2 » 01 Oct 2014 16:38
JIM OK, So if they did all that, where the money for all our top players we were forced to sell, in order to pay off the tax man,This is a bigger conspiracy than ROSWELL. JM said the new owners bought new players . WRONG no players were transfer paid poss COX but all the rest were loans or free, start asking questions, ITS YOUR CLUB
by Ian Royal » 01 Oct 2014 16:58
winchester_royalRoyal LadyIan Royal The question was have they done anything positive. That statement and being 'great saviours' are entirely different things. No one has said they are great saviours.
Although their involvement has stopped the club going deeper into financial trouble and probably administration / selling off all our decent players.
Yeah and your contribution was : they allowed us to purchase some players. My view is that we got money in from other players which would have countered that outlay.
But we wouldn't have been able to use that money from bringing players in if the Thais hadn't arrived in the first place. The ALF sale covered 1 month's worth of tax bills, it didn't cover the massive losses we made from last season, nor the many more tax bills still to come. What part of we were days away from administration do people not understand? If the club was still in the ownership position it was in 3 months ago we'd have brought in no players, sold plenty more, and still probably be in administration. I don't think anybody is suggesting that we can be 100% certain that things are completely rosy now, but to suggest that their arrival didn't massively contribute to the business we were able to do this season is, imho, pure folly.
by melonhead » 01 Oct 2014 19:41
Who Moved The Goalposts?KC Royal I'm not sure what people expect. We're not going to spend millions when we've got FFP to think about, plus wages of the current playing staff.
Tbh, I've never thought you need to spend loads to succeed in the Championship anyway though.
Indeed. The 106 team was cheap by comparison to some of the teams today.
by melonhead » 01 Oct 2014 19:44
JIM WRONG no players were transfer paid... poss COX
by Extended-Phenotype » 02 Oct 2014 14:16
melonhead ]JIM WRONG no players were transfer paid... poss COX
![]()
Brilliant
by winchester_royal » 03 Oct 2014 20:08
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 332 guests