Lacostewinchester_royal Hi, Bring Back The SB
Hi - oh and everyone knows iI used to be BBTSB.
Gosh, how embarrassing for me
by winchester_royal » 14 Nov 2012 15:47
Lacostewinchester_royal Hi, Bring Back The SB
Hi - oh and everyone knows iI used to be BBTSB.
by sandman » 14 Nov 2012 15:55
LacosteOnce were BiscuitmenLacoste Oh, and 2-3 players in key areas in Jan and a new style of play and we could easly start to pick up victories in this league.
Those saying there's no point sacking Mcd because no manager could play any different with this crop of players are speaking Bullshit TBH and may aswll just sit back and wait to be relegated. I would still give the guy the Everton game though to see if he's learnt anything.
Yet there are worse things in footballing life than being relegated from the Premiership.
Like say sacking a more than competent manager with a strong record of getting out of the championship, mucking up the replacement, and then realising that perhaps there are also worse things than being a yo-yo team. <cough> Wolves.
Staying in the Premiership is a reasonably long shot for promoted teams not doping on debt. Incremental growth with stability of management has thankfully been the Reading way, if that means there are a few relegations and promotion parties along the way I would take that over disloyalty, cheating via debt, and even finishing lower mid table in the Premiership every year.
You also patently have no idea how much money there was to spend in the summer, nobody on here does. If you do I’d love to know the figure and your source. ‘Everybody knows’ and ‘other random moany poster’ are not sources.
I don't have a figure, as there wasn't an actual exact figure. My source is my brother in law who is a senior figure at London Irish and has regular meetings with Nigel Howe. He has told me a few things which have prettuy much mirrored what other people who have contacts at the club have said.
My Brother in law has no reason to lie and neither do I
by melonhead » 14 Nov 2012 17:00
Extended-Phenotypemelonhead not really-seems quite pertinent. it says to me that its not actually money spent that is key to performamnce/achievment
west ham and saints spent more than us last year, and we beat them to the championship
regardless of how much money we have to pend, or how much you want us to spend- the fact remains you cannot get a whole new team in in the summer and hope to be succesful. see QPR again.
and you arent going to attract proven quality prmiere league players to reading no matter what you offer.
its about slow and steady evolution. if that means we go down and take the parachute payments, and get back up again in a year or so. so be it.
Is your argument: "we have a better squad because we spend less money"?
Surely if Reading are as good as they are without spending as much, we'd be better still by spending a bit more on players we need?
Anti-money arguments just don't work.
by melonhead » 14 Nov 2012 17:02
LacosteOnce were BiscuitmenLacoste Oh, and 2-3 players in key areas in Jan and a new style of play and we could easly start to pick up victories in this league.
Those saying there's no point sacking Mcd because no manager could play any different with this crop of players are speaking Bullshit TBH and may aswll just sit back and wait to be relegated. I would still give the guy the Everton game though to see if he's learnt anything.
Yet there are worse things in footballing life than being relegated from the Premiership.
Like say sacking a more than competent manager with a strong record of getting out of the championship, mucking up the replacement, and then realising that perhaps there are also worse things than being a yo-yo team. <cough> Wolves.
Staying in the Premiership is a reasonably long shot for promoted teams not doping on debt. Incremental growth with stability of management has thankfully been the Reading way, if that means there are a few relegations and promotion parties along the way I would take that over disloyalty, cheating via debt, and even finishing lower mid table in the Premiership every year.
You also patently have no idea how much money there was to spend in the summer, nobody on here does. If you do I’d love to know the figure and your source. ‘Everybody knows’ and ‘other random moany poster’ are not sources.
I don't have a figure, as there wasn't an actual exact figure. My source is my brother in law who is a senior figure at London Irish and has regular meetings with Nigel Howe. He has told me a few things which have prettuy much mirrored what other people who have contacts at the club have said.
My Brother in law has no reason to lie and neither do I
by Ian Royal » 14 Nov 2012 17:04
winchester_royalLacostewinchester_royal Hi, Bring Back The SB
Hi - oh and everyone knows iI used to be BBTSB.
Gosh, how embarrassing for me
by Ian Royal » 14 Nov 2012 17:21
Lacoste How am I a WUM?
Grow up.
Ian RoyalLacoste How am I a WUM?
Grow up.
One or t'other, you pick.
by melonhead » 14 Nov 2012 17:37
by USA_Loyal_Royal » 14 Nov 2012 17:47
ZacNaloen We should be able to afford better players now, the argument about taking a risk on Zaha... is the same argument we used to make about taking risks on players for 250k
We can afford a better calibre of risk now. And we should be taking it. Zaha never had much of a risk anyway.*
*Which is why we had no chance of getting him anyway
by melonhead » 14 Nov 2012 17:50
by winchester_royal » 14 Nov 2012 17:50
USA_Loyal_RoyalZacNaloen We should be able to afford better players now, the argument about taking a risk on Zaha... is the same argument we used to make about taking risks on players for 250k
We can afford a better calibre of risk now. And we should be taking it. Zaha never had much of a risk anyway.*
*Which is why we had no chance of getting him anyway
This. Im not sure why we didnt take the "risk" of buying zaha this summer. After this season he is going to be inflated even more now.
by urz13 » 14 Nov 2012 17:55
by USA_Loyal_Royal » 14 Nov 2012 18:00
urz13 CBA to read the whole thread, it might have been mentioned. We had a fee agree for Zaha, about £4m, then palace changed their mind and wanted £6m, we (quite rightly) refused to pay.
by Big Ern » 15 Nov 2012 11:34
Lacoste How am I a WUM?
Grow up.
by Cobi » 15 Nov 2012 12:17
USA_Loyal_Royalurz13 CBA to read the whole thread, it might have been mentioned. We had a fee agree for Zaha, about £4m, then palace changed their mind and wanted £6m, we (quite rightly) refused to pay.
Thats how i remembered it. 4m would have been a hell of a bargain! 6m was to much atm.
by melonhead » 15 Nov 2012 12:25
by Cobi » 15 Nov 2012 12:27
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 15 Nov 2012 12:40
by winchester_royal » 15 Nov 2012 12:46
Users browsing this forum: Royals and Racers, Snowflake Royal, tmesis and 300 guests