by SPARTA » 18 Dec 2013 22:41
by Uke » 18 Dec 2013 22:41
by multisync1830 » 18 Dec 2013 22:47
SPARTA I can only tell you what I've been told with regards to owning the football club. Anton bought 51% of the club, STAR still hold shares, and Anton wanted to purchase them as well but up until now STAR have refused to sell - ask them why and how many they hold? (if indeed that is correct). SJM own 43%. The papers all ran with 51% to AZ and 49% to SJM, but they just figured SJM owned the whole club, so he must be left with 49%.
by Uke » 18 Dec 2013 22:53
multisync1830SPARTA I can only tell you what I've been told with regards to owning the football club. Anton bought 51% of the club, STAR still hold shares, and Anton wanted to purchase them as well but up until now STAR have refused to sell - ask them why and how many they hold? (if indeed that is correct). SJM own 43%. The papers all ran with 51% to AZ and 49% to SJM, but they just figured SJM owned the whole club, so he must be left with 49%.
But there is no actual evidence to show this 43% figure whilst there is plenty to show 49% would you agree?
by multisync1830 » 18 Dec 2013 22:57
Ukemultisync1830SPARTA I can only tell you what I've been told with regards to owning the football club. Anton bought 51% of the club, STAR still hold shares, and Anton wanted to purchase them as well but up until now STAR have refused to sell - ask them why and how many they hold? (if indeed that is correct). SJM own 43%. The papers all ran with 51% to AZ and 49% to SJM, but they just figured SJM owned the whole club, so he must be left with 49%.
But there is no actual evidence to show this 43% figure whilst there is plenty to show 49% would you agree?
See above they are different companies
THE READING FOOTBALL CLUB (HOLDINGS) PLC owns 49% of the Reading Football Club Ltd
TSI own 51% of the Reading Football Club Ltd
AZ owns 100% of TSI
SJM owns 98.5% of RFC holdings
by Uke » 18 Dec 2013 23:00
by multisync1830 » 18 Dec 2013 23:15
Uke The evidence is that it doesn't exist, other than a repeated "thread fact"
by SPARTA » 18 Dec 2013 23:20
by Uke » 19 Dec 2013 01:22
by Broxroyal » 19 Dec 2013 09:44
by winchester_royal » 19 Dec 2013 10:57
by Uke » 19 Dec 2013 11:17
winchester_royal Deary me...I hope none of you are accountants
by maffff » 19 Dec 2013 11:56
by SPARTA » 19 Dec 2013 11:59
by maffff » 19 Dec 2013 12:17
SPARTA All I can be sure of at this point is that a boy will never swim faster than a shark. #ITK
by SPARTA » 19 Dec 2013 12:18
maffffSPARTA All I can be sure of at this point is that a boy will never swim faster than a shark. #ITK
Weeelllllllll, now you mention it. The Greenland shark tends to average 0.76 miles per hour and has a top speed of 1.6-1.7mph - Frédérick Bousquet was recorded as swimming at an average of 5.34 mph in the 50m freestyle in 2009. Although, as a fully grown male, so not technically a boy.
by maffff » 19 Dec 2013 12:23
by floyd__streete » 19 Dec 2013 13:02
Uke Where are STAR on this thread? They could answer this straight out
by ZacNaloen » 19 Dec 2013 14:18
by yuuichi » 19 Dec 2013 15:36
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], parky, rabidbee, SouthDownsRoyal and 778 guests