by Very near...far away » 30 May 2011 17:32
by superreadingfan » 30 May 2011 17:33
by brendywendy » 30 May 2011 17:38
by DOYLERSAROYALER » 30 May 2011 17:50
AR Royal As said above...reading were doing terribly under rodgers and looking like relegation candidates. This was due to Rodgers wanting to play a style of football that Reading didnt have the players to carry out. So therefore it didnt work out for Rodgers at Reading. It happens...just because it doesnt work out, doesnt mean a manager is a bad one. It didnt work out for Sam Allardyce at Newcastle a few years ago...does that mean he's a bad manager? Not at all. As shown by a very successful reign at Bolton and a decent one at Blackburn in which he was strangely fired from.
At swansea, they already had the players and structure in place to play the style of football that Rodgers was so insistent on playing and it has worked out for him.
However it was the correct decision for Reading to part company because we were looking like going down and once Mcdermott took over, he turned it around and within a season and a half, has us contending for promotion once again.
I dont think anyone at Reading should or will have any regrets about the change in management.
Good luck to Swansea and Rodgers (even if they should be playing in the Welsh league instead...or at least be governed by the English FA)
by superreadingfan » 30 May 2011 18:04
zummerset pcunt the oxf@rd off you newbies jonny come lately vankers
superreadingfanzummerset pcunt the oxf@rd off you newbies jonny come lately vankers
m8 ive been a fan since 06 dont tar me with that brush
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mid Sussex Royal, WestYorksRoyal and 257 guests