IDEAL

10 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
ROKERITE
Member
Posts: 154
Joined: 16 Jun 2009 20:48

IDEAL

by ROKERITE » 30 May 2011 17:29

Every football fan gets things wrong now and then. However has there ever been a more monumental error of judgement than yours of Rodgers? It didn't take long to show just how mistaken you were, and in what a bitter-sweet way it's been demonstrated.

Very near...far away
Member
Posts: 296
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 11:14
Location: Sydney, Straya

Re: IDEAL

by Very near...far away » 30 May 2011 17:32

No.

Reading under Rodgers were going down. So what he does with Swansea 8 months (and a season) later doesn't really mean anything.

superreadingfan
Member
Posts: 341
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 16:37

Re: IDEAL

by superreadingfan » 30 May 2011 17:33

Made$ski was a clown to get rid of Brandon Rogers when he wasgiven no time to settle. Mcdermot very much inherited Rogers team and it shows at how class of a manager he is as both of his teams made it to the final!

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: IDEAL

by brendywendy » 30 May 2011 17:38

what a lot of shit.

AR Royal
Member
Posts: 19
Joined: 17 May 2011 05:10

Re: IDEAL

by AR Royal » 30 May 2011 17:45

As said above...reading were doing terribly under rodgers and looking like relegation candidates. This was due to Rodgers wanting to play a style of football that Reading didnt have the players to carry out. So therefore it didnt work out for Rodgers at Reading. It happens...just because it doesnt work out, doesnt mean a manager is a bad one. It didnt work out for Sam Allardyce at Newcastle a few years ago...does that mean he's a bad manager? Not at all. As shown by a very successful reign at Bolton and a decent one at Blackburn in which he was strangely fired from.

At swansea, they already had the players and structure in place to play the style of football that Rodgers was so insistent on playing and it has worked out for him.

However it was the correct decision for Reading to part company because we were looking like going down and once Mcdermott took over, he turned it around and within a season and a half, has us contending for promotion once again.

I dont think anyone at Reading should or will have any regrets about the change in management.

Good luck to Swansea and Rodgers (even if they should be playing in the Welsh league instead...or at least be governed by the English FA)


DOYLERSAROYALER
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1590
Joined: 27 Dec 2008 18:59

Re: IDEAL

by DOYLERSAROYALER » 30 May 2011 17:50

AR Royal As said above...reading were doing terribly under rodgers and looking like relegation candidates. This was due to Rodgers wanting to play a style of football that Reading didnt have the players to carry out. So therefore it didnt work out for Rodgers at Reading. It happens...just because it doesnt work out, doesnt mean a manager is a bad one. It didnt work out for Sam Allardyce at Newcastle a few years ago...does that mean he's a bad manager? Not at all. As shown by a very successful reign at Bolton and a decent one at Blackburn in which he was strangely fired from.

At swansea, they already had the players and structure in place to play the style of football that Rodgers was so insistent on playing and it has worked out for him.

However it was the correct decision for Reading to part company because we were looking like going down and once Mcdermott took over, he turned it around and within a season and a half, has us contending for promotion once again.

I dont think anyone at Reading should or will have any regrets about the change in management.

Good luck to Swansea and Rodgers (even if they should be playing in the Welsh league instead...or at least be governed by the English FA)



Totally agree - Swansea was the ideal club for Rodgers ..Martinez had already kicked off the style of football that Rodgers believed in, so Rodgers picked up the reigns , brought in a few players to complement the squad and hes delivered...fair play to him but as this post says, he did not have the players to really do this at Reading , nor did he get the sufficient budget to buy the players to do it ....

sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: IDEAL

by sandman » 30 May 2011 17:58

Go do one you Mackem pcunt.

User avatar
zummerset
Member
Posts: 817
Joined: 29 Feb 2008 18:18
Location: Don't tell I tell ee

Re: IDEAL

by zummerset » 30 May 2011 18:01

pcunt the oxf@rd off you newbies jonny come lately vankers

superreadingfan
Member
Posts: 341
Joined: 10 Jul 2010 16:37

Re: IDEAL

by superreadingfan » 30 May 2011 18:04

zummerset pcunt the oxf@rd off you newbies jonny come lately vankers

m8 ive been a fan since 06 dont tar me with that brush


User avatar
Arch
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 4082
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:35
Location: USA! USA! USA!

Re: IDEAL

by Arch » 30 May 2011 18:06

superreadingfan
zummerset pcunt the oxf@rd off you newbies jonny come lately vankers

m8 ive been a fan since 06 dont tar me with that brush

Start acting like one, then.

10 posts   •   Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mid Sussex Royal, WestYorksRoyal and 257 guests

It is currently 20 Nov 2024 18:18