by andrew1957 » 01 Apr 2014 22:00
by JC » 01 Apr 2014 22:03
andrew1957 And why was Frid’s goal ruled out. I could not see any reason.
by SCIAG » 01 Apr 2014 22:09
SCIAG I agree with what's been said about their #10. He really came into it once Dembélé went off and was comfortably the best player on the pitch.
In the first half, we had the better of it, carving out several good opportunities. Dickie scored from a corner, then Stacey rounded their goalkeeper and got clipped. Fosu scored the resulting penalty very casually. Fulham only really threatened us with long solo runs, there was no organisation in attack from them and we dealt with them pretty well.
Second half, we came out and were excellent for 10 minutes, getting a lot of shots away and dominating possession. Sammi had a goal disallowed after it was judged that he was offside. We had a few cleared off the line, one of which might have been with an arm (Sammi was pretty adamant). Then Dembélé went off after being extremely lethargic and basically rubbish, and their #10 moved to the striker's spot. He looked dangerous pretty much straight away, but Dickie made a few good tackles. Then Hyam caught him (perhaps unnecessarily) and they had a stonewall penalty. Their second came after a couple of tame clearances.
Reading's MOTM was probably Dickie, despite one missed tackle that Hyam covered expertly. Highlight was making an excellent tackle, then getting up and playing a precision pass down the right flank.
It was probably the best game I've seen Sammi have, and the worst I've seen from Kuhl, who misplaced a few passes in the first half (though in fairness he improved in the second half and absolutely nailed a couple). Owusu and Kelly were good; Cardwell linked up well, but maybe wasn't as clinical as he should have been, particularly with headers. Stacey and Fosu are both horribly one footed, which limits how well they can dribble.
by Royal Prince » 01 Apr 2014 22:13
andrew1957 The Fulham keeper was sent off because he was last man. It seemed very harsh but was the correct decision by the letter of the law.
by Nameless » 01 Apr 2014 22:35
by Pepe the Horseman » 01 Apr 2014 22:36
by P!ssed Off » 01 Apr 2014 22:39
JCandrew1957 And why was Frid’s goal ruled out. I could not see any reason.
I assume for offside as the lino had his flag up. Looked pretty dubious to me
by SCIAG » 01 Apr 2014 22:41
Royal Prince Owusu stood out for me, looks solid defensively and even better going forwards. Either he's a frustrated winger playing at full back, or he's just naturally gifted in both skill sets.
by Cape Town Royal » 01 Apr 2014 23:03
by marlowuk » 02 Apr 2014 01:36
by Royals and Racers » 02 Apr 2014 07:49
Cape Town Royal Living in Exeter had no way of getting there tonight but interested to know how many were there?
by wolsey » 02 Apr 2014 08:26
by ZacNaloen » 02 Apr 2014 09:14
by M U R T Y » 02 Apr 2014 09:44
andrew1957 Well that was a classic game of two halves. At half time I said to my mate that the lads had been magnificent. First to every ball and 4-0 at half time would not have flattered them. The Fulham keeper was sent off because he was last man. It seemed very harsh but was the correct decision by the letter of the law.
by melonhead » 02 Apr 2014 10:05
by andrew1957 » 02 Apr 2014 10:46
M U R T Yandrew1957 Well that was a classic game of two halves. At half time I said to my mate that the lads had been magnificent. First to every ball and 4-0 at half time would not have flattered them. The Fulham keeper was sent off because he was last man. It seemed very harsh but was the correct decision by the letter of the law.
You realise in the letter of the law, there is no mention of "the last man"?
The rule states it's a red card if the defender/keeper prevents a goalscoring opportunity, last man or not.
Amazing that so many football fans and indeed TV/Radio pundits spout this guff so often.
by andrew1957 » 02 Apr 2014 10:50
M U R T Yandrew1957 Well that was a classic game of two halves. At half time I said to my mate that the lads had been magnificent. First to every ball and 4-0 at half time would not have flattered them. The Fulham keeper was sent off because he was last man. It seemed very harsh but was the correct decision by the letter of the law.
You realise in the letter of the law, there is no mention of "the last man"?
The rule states it's a red card if the defender/keeper prevents a goalscoring opportunity, last man or not.
Amazing that so many football fans and indeed TV/Radio pundits spout this guff so often.
by Platypuss » 02 Apr 2014 10:50
by andrew1957 » 02 Apr 2014 10:53
Platypuss So what would happen if an attacker who was otherwise through on goal was brought down by the goalie just outside the box?
by Royal Prince » 02 Apr 2014 11:05
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 186 guests