by Sutekh » 03 Feb 2017 13:15
by Davezk » 03 Feb 2017 13:43
by Norfolk Royal » 03 Feb 2017 15:32
by Kuhl_Runnings » 03 Feb 2017 15:46
Sutekh the long awkward journey from Count Durham
by Z175 » 03 Feb 2017 18:10
Kuhl_RunningsSutekh the long awkward journey from Count Durham
by genome » 03 Feb 2017 18:40
by Royals and Racers » 04 Feb 2017 13:53
by Pepe the Horseman » 04 Feb 2017 14:00
by Sutekh » 04 Feb 2017 14:02
by Humanistic » 04 Feb 2017 14:06
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Feb 2017 14:13
by Lower West » 04 Feb 2017 14:32
NewCorkSeth 4 CMs? How do they all fit do you think?
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Feb 2017 14:34
Lower WestNewCorkSeth 4 CMs? How do they all fit do you think?
Williams right wing back.
Kelly \Mutch centre midfield.
Swift playing ahead and given the freedom to float.
by strap » 04 Feb 2017 14:37
NewCorkSethLower WestNewCorkSeth 4 CMs? How do they all fit do you think?
Williams right wing back.
Kelly \Mutch centre midfield.
Swift playing ahead and given the freedom to float.
Then where is Gunter playing?
by Victor Meldrew » 04 Feb 2017 14:38
by Royal Ginger » 04 Feb 2017 14:45
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Feb 2017 14:50
strapNewCorkSethLower West
Williams right wing back.
Kelly \Mutch centre midfield.
Swift playing ahead and given the freedom to float.
Then where is Gunter playing?
LFB. Looks like 4-4-2 with DW at RFB.
Unless CG is third CH.
Yep, could well be DW RWB JO LWB, with CG, LM and TB 3 CHs.
by strap » 04 Feb 2017 14:51
NewCorkSethstrapNewCorkSeth Then where is Gunter playing?
LFB. Looks like 4-4-2 with DW at RFB.
Unless CG is third CH.
Yep, could well be DW RWB JO LWB, with CG, LM and TB 3 CHs.
I just dont see why we would play a CM at RB, a RB at LB and a LB at LW when we have fit players in all those positions?
by NewCorkSeth » 04 Feb 2017 14:52
strapNewCorkSethstrap
LFB. Looks like 4-4-2 with DW at RFB.
Unless CG is third CH.
Yep, could well be DW RWB JO LWB, with CG, LM and TB 3 CHs.
I just dont see why we would play a CM at RB, a RB at LB and a LB at LW when we have fit players in all those positions?
Agree, but then Stam hasn't been wrong too much so far!
by Sutekh » 04 Feb 2017 15:11
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 190 guests