by The Royal Forester » 14 Jan 2024 14:48
by NathStPaul » 14 Jan 2024 14:49
by The Royal Forester » 14 Jan 2024 15:02
NathStPaul Did this really require a new thread?
by Elm Park Kid » 14 Jan 2024 15:03
by NathStPaul » 14 Jan 2024 15:04
Elm Park Kid Brogue will get upset if we use threads that they didn't start.
by NathStPaul » 14 Jan 2024 15:05
The Royal ForesterNathStPaul Did this really require a new thread?
I just knew you would be the first to repond, with you usual negative view on most (if not all) new threads.
by The Royal Forester » 14 Jan 2024 15:13
NathStPaulThe Royal ForesterNathStPaul Did this really require a new thread?
I just knew you would be the first to repond, with you usual negative view on most (if not all) new threads.
There is a perfectly good thread in place about yesterday's protest. You just want attention.
by The Royal Forester » 14 Jan 2024 15:13
The Royal ForesterNathStPaulThe Royal Forester I just knew you would be the first to repond, with you usual negative view on most (if not all) new threads.
There is a perfectly good thread in place about yesterday's protest. You just want attention.
I've heard it all now! You calling someone else an attention seeker. Talk about a pot calling a kettle black.
by Winston Biscuit » 14 Jan 2024 15:25
by shadesrwrf » 14 Jan 2024 15:40
by Royal_jimmy » 14 Jan 2024 15:54
by tmesis » 14 Jan 2024 15:57
by blythspartan » 14 Jan 2024 16:07
by Sutekh » 14 Jan 2024 16:18
by Dirk Gently » 14 Jan 2024 17:03
by shadesrwrf » 14 Jan 2024 17:21
Dirk Gently As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
That would have given the perception of an organised and co-ordinated group who knew what they were doing and wanted to protest in a way that didn't impact the club, rather than a disorganised group determined to stop the match and impact the club through FA fines and a (suspended?) points deduction.
The pre-publicity about a pitch invasion at the end and the reality of what actually happened isn't a good look.
by P!ssed Off » 14 Jan 2024 17:22
Dirk Gently As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
That would have given the perception of an organised and co-ordinated group who knew what they were doing and wanted to protest in a way that didn't impact the club, rather than a disorganised group determined to stop the match and impact the club through FA fines and a (suspended?) points deduction.
The pre-publicity about a pitch invasion at the end and the reality of what actually happened isn't a good look.
by tmesis » 14 Jan 2024 17:43
Dirk Gently As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
by shadesrwrf » 14 Jan 2024 17:56
tmesisDirk Gently As I've posted elsewhere, I think it would have been much more effective and impressive to go on for 10 minutes, then all get up and go back to the stands and let the game go on.
I think the fact that the game was abandoned made it get much more publicity. A 10 minute delay would barely have got a mention give that we've delayed numerous games this season already.
by Reading4eva » 14 Jan 2024 18:04
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill, Crusader Royal, Jammy Dodger, skipper, Tails, themwasthedays, WestYorksRoyal and 361 guests