by The 17 Bus » 17 May 2007 09:56
by el_presidente » 17 May 2007 09:59
The 17 Bus can anyone pull up any figures on this, as to me is a load of balls that just seems to have been accepted, there wont be one for Watford, and others have done fine in the second season, they really only try to apply it to smaller clubs IMHO, even West Ham are not really accused of it, it is mostly aimed at Wigan.
by Mr Angry » 17 May 2007 10:00
by Behindu » 17 May 2007 10:03
by papereyes » 17 May 2007 10:17
Mr Angry Its all a load of rubbish.
Statistically, in the 14 years of the Premiership, 22 teams promoted up have survived their first Year in the Premiership; for the theory that there was a "2nd season syndrome", you would have to accept that a large proportion of those 22 teams would be relegated the 2nd season......say, 50%???
Of the 22 teams, 4 were relegated the 2nd season; 17.5%
Of the remaining 18, 11 survived for at least 5 years.
In other words, survive the first season, and you have a 50/50 chance of surviving at least 5 seasons in the Premiership.
by Behindu » 17 May 2007 10:23
papereyes But most clubs do worse in their second season.
.
by aaronrfc » 17 May 2007 10:35
papereyesMr Angry Its all a load of rubbish.
Statistically, in the 14 years of the Premiership, 22 teams promoted up have survived their first Year in the Premiership; for the theory that there was a "2nd season syndrome", you would have to accept that a large proportion of those 22 teams would be relegated the 2nd season......say, 50%???
Of the 22 teams, 4 were relegated the 2nd season; 17.5%
Of the remaining 18, 11 survived for at least 5 years.
In other words, survive the first season, and you have a 50/50 chance of surviving at least 5 seasons in the Premiership.
But most clubs do worse in their second season.
In terms of positions, I made it three that improved their position.
Basically, if you're struggling already, you'd be odds on to go down. If you're safely midtable or higher, you'll probably drop a bit, but odds on to stay up.
In terms of points? Well, I haven't looked.
by papereyes » 17 May 2007 10:37
Uke Blackburn were worse in their second season in the Prem
by papereyes » 17 May 2007 10:38
Behindupapereyes But most clubs do worse in their second season.
.
You'd expect half the teams in the division to do a little worse one season then the previous. Few teams stay in the same spot for 2 seasons running and not all can improve (OK I know they could all rise 1 place if the top team dropped to the bottom !).
Second season syndrome must require that a team in it's second season not only does significantly worse than it did the season before but also worse than the vast majority of other teams comparing one season with the previous.
If we finish 12th next year and Bolton finish 16th with Spurs in 10th have we suffered 'second season syndrome' ? I would argue not.
by Behindu » 17 May 2007 10:44
by Hoop Blah » 17 May 2007 10:59
by brendywendy » 17 May 2007 11:11
Hoop Blah I think the syndrome is just as much about players as it is clubs, if not more so to be honest.
It seems more diffuclt to reproduce good form once opposition have sussed you out a bit and you're no longer an unknown quantity. The momentum built up from winning week in week out in the Championship will also have died down a bit, and every week will not seem like a new adventure to players and fans alike and for our players it's going to tough to keep their very high standards.
by Silver Fox » 17 May 2007 11:12
by Dr Hfuhruhurr » 17 May 2007 11:37
by Hoop Blah » 17 May 2007 11:43
brendywendyHoop Blah I think the syndrome is just as much about players as it is clubs, if not more so to be honest.
It seems more diffuclt to reproduce good form once opposition have sussed you out a bit and you're no longer an unknown quantity. The momentum built up from winning week in week out in the Championship will also have died down a bit, and every week will not seem like a new adventure to players and fans alike and for our players it's going to tough to keep their very high standards.
i hate all this rubbish about players and teams being "worked out"
what a load of rubbish
i have "worked out" how ronaldo plays and what he does, when he tries the step over, but this in no way guarantees i would be able to stop him doing it
i have worked out the way that chelsea play, direct, quickly to the front 1,2 or three, strong physical and athletic players etc
does this mean i cant stop them ?
if reading play attractive, quick passing and breaking football
people may see this,and "work it out" but im not sure they can really do alot about it
by starbug » 17 May 2007 11:45
by brendywendy » 17 May 2007 11:49
starbug I think you'll find second season syndrome only applies to small clubs the pudits want relegated in revenge for being proved so embarrasingly wrong this year![]()
Sunderland, with a famous manager and big club syndrome all over it - I'd be surprised to see pundits saying they'll struggle next season, despite their team being vastly inferior to our Championship side.
by Dr Hfuhruhurr » 17 May 2007 11:50
Hoop Blah Our 'surprise package' status certainly helped us at the begining of last season and gave us the belief and momentum to do as well as we did.
.
by Uke » 17 May 2007 12:04
papereyesUke Blackburn were worse in their second season in the Prem
No they weren't.
Users browsing this forum: Armadillo Roadkill and 191 guests