by gonesy » 14 Jun 2008 15:26
by sucatraps » 14 Jun 2008 17:39
by readingbedding » 14 Jun 2008 18:11
by Avon Royal » 14 Jun 2008 21:40
by Ian Royal » 14 Jun 2008 22:43
by floyd__streete » 15 Jun 2008 00:59
by Archie's penalty » 15 Jun 2008 01:36
floyd__streete I hope for the sake of the thread starter's credibility that he is talking with tongue very much in cheek, otherwise he is absolutely deLOLuded. This draw is a reasonably big deal for Dagenham, but to suggest that a game against Reading will be like a cup final for any of the teams we will face week-in week-out next season is as delusional as it is clueless. Is this the RTG ready-made excuse for next season - it was Nottingham Forest's cup final?
by cmonurz » 15 Jun 2008 18:26
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 15 Jun 2008 23:58
floyd__streete I hope for the sake of the thread starter's credibility that he is talking with tongue very much in cheek, otherwise he is absolutely deLOLuded. This draw is a reasonably big deal for Dagenham, but to suggest that a game against Reading will be like a cup final for any of the teams we will face week-in week-out next season is as delusional as it is clueless. Is this the RTG ready-made excuse for next season - it was Nottingham Forest's cup final?
by Archie's penalty » 16 Jun 2008 00:46
Rev Algenon Stickleback Hfloyd__streete I hope for the sake of the thread starter's credibility that he is talking with tongue very much in cheek, otherwise he is absolutely deLOLuded. This draw is a reasonably big deal for Dagenham, but to suggest that a game against Reading will be like a cup final for any of the teams we will face week-in week-out next season is as delusional as it is clueless. Is this the RTG ready-made excuse for next season - it was Nottingham Forest's cup final?
Yep, nobody will raise their game for a match v us, and we'll be routinely nudged into the "C" category of teams who operate a A/B/C ticket price structure.
I can't believe anyone would think any different. I'd say for Dagenham, their boss was probably thinking more about the challenge the game will be than the glamour of the tie. I doubt there'll be more than 2500 there.
by gonesy » 16 Jun 2008 00:56
by StevenKelliher » 16 Jun 2008 06:16
by g » 16 Jun 2008 06:28
StevenKelliher I think in all fairness, if we are serious about getting promoted next season, then it's US who should be treating every game like a cup final.
by rg6royal » 16 Jun 2008 07:54
by Bacon Double Cheese » 17 Jun 2008 18:05
We need somebody to whip them into shaperg6royal We will play a very weakened side ( fringe flayers )
Good to see that it's a "cup final" playing us to a team though.
by soggy biscuit » 17 Jun 2008 18:50
gonesy Ready to be the "Cup Final" for most teams we play nxt yr?
by gonesy » 18 Jun 2008 01:22
by Sarah Star » 18 Jun 2008 10:03
gonesy Not arrogant just realistic. I live in Plymouth & most Argyle fans look up to teams like Reading & Wigan for what they have achieved & obviously envy us. They see our club as a model for success that they would love theirs to replicate. And as for the opening Madstad fixture, they are already talking about bringing 4000 fans up for it just like they did the last couple of times. I admit this is partly because we are one of the closest Championship teams to them but it is also because our stadium dumps on their ground from a great height and they see it as a good day out with a big match feel. Now I don't know about you people but aside from it being the first home game next season, I'm not getting that excited about playing Plymouth Argyle
by M Brook » 18 Jun 2008 12:39
Users browsing this forum: RG30 and 404 guests