The Blame Poll

Who's to Blame??

Coppell
26
13%
Players
89
43%
Hammond
6
3%
Madjeski
16
8%
Fans
16
8%
Pitch
18
9%
Sh*t Refs
11
5%
Clappers
23
11%
 
Total votes: 205
boy1985

The Blame Poll

by boy1985 » 15 May 2009 09:25

Who's to blame?

User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12110
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: The Blame Poll

by Dirk Gently » 15 May 2009 09:26

Where's the option for "life is complicated and it'll be down to a combination of factors, not just one"?

boy1985

Re: The Blame Poll

by boy1985 » 15 May 2009 09:27

Dirk Gently Where's the option for "life is complicated and it'll be down to a combination of factors, not just one"?


use clappers for that one.

The Real Sandhurst Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2161
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 10:06
Location: Sandhurst

Re: The Blame Poll

by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 15 May 2009 09:40

Wally Downes in my opionion was the route cause of this problem as he set us up as total defensive unit not to concede.

The side being defensive were unable to score goals as we had everyone back,.

The players were frightened to move out of their positions on the chess board in case they made a mistake.

Unfortunatly he forgot attacking football and scoring goals win games we did not score so that's why we we ended up 4th..

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: The Blame Poll

by brendywendy » 15 May 2009 09:45

boy1985
Dirk Gently Where's the option for "life is complicated and it'll be down to a combination of factors, not just one"?


use clappers for that one.


+1


User avatar
watfordroyal
Member
Posts: 470
Joined: 24 Sep 2004 14:26
Location: Within Spitting Distance of the Rookery

Re: The Blame Poll

by watfordroyal » 15 May 2009 09:48

I blame my lucky pants!

Simply not up to the job anymore,
don't know their best line-up,
they've lost the support,
and lost the dressing room,

Need a new modern thinking smart pair, with fresh ideas! :lol:
Last edited by watfordroyal on 15 May 2009 09:52, edited 1 time in total.

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3652
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: The Blame Poll

by Royalwaster » 15 May 2009 09:52

Who is 'Madjeski'? And for that matter is 'John Madesjki' mentioned on the OS under the 'Full report of press conference'? (Steve Coppell, John Madesjki and Nick Hammond today held a press conference to mark Steve's departure) - are these guy in some way related to our chairman, John Madejski?

boy1985

Re: The Blame Poll

by boy1985 » 15 May 2009 09:53

Royalwaster Who is 'Madjeski'? And for that matter is 'John Madesjki' mentioned on the OS under the 'Full report of press conference'? (Steve Coppell, John Madesjki and Nick Hammond today held a press conference to mark Steve's departure) - are these guy in some way related to our chairman, John Madejski?


vote clappers for that one.

User avatar
yuomi
Member
Posts: 860
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 11:20
Location: dum spiro spero

Re: The Blame Poll

by yuomi » 15 May 2009 10:09

i want to blame fate. for its confluence of events that could not have been conceived or contrived by any sentient man or beast. that and the fact that the beer was even more watered down this season...


Snowball
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 20780
Joined: 02 Jan 2009 18:35

Re: The Blame Poll

by Snowball » 15 May 2009 10:20

yuomi i want to blame fate. for its confluence of events that could not have been conceived or contrived by any sentient man or beast. that and the fact that the beer was even more watered down this season...




On that count, in the last game we lost to two outstanding (freakish?) goals

There was a goal of the season against us at Plymouth

There was another great run and shot from distance, Forest?

a very very good scissor kick v us for Ipswich

a keeper who had a blinder in the league 1-0 defeat at Burnley

The off-the-bar that doesn't result in a goal (for us) and a minute later a goal for them off the bar and then knocked in

Even the phantom goal worked against us. We were looking winners but the PG got Watford riled up

Seriously, have we been a tad unlucky this season?

User avatar
yuomi
Member
Posts: 860
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 11:20
Location: dum spiro spero

Re: The Blame Poll

by yuomi » 15 May 2009 10:23

Snowball
yuomi i want to blame fate. for its confluence of events that could not have been conceived or contrived by any sentient man or beast. that and the fact that the beer was even more watered down this season...




On that count, in the last game we lost to two outstanding (freakish?) goals

There was a goal of the season against us at Plymouth

There was another great run and shot from distance, Forest?

a very very good scissor kick v us for Ipswich

a keeper who had a blinder in the league 1-0 defeat at Burnley

The off-the-bar that doesn't result in a goal (for us) and a minute later a goal for them off the bar and then knocked in

Even the phantom goal worked against us. We were looking winners but the PG got Watford riled up

Seriously, have we been a tad unlucky this season?


i think you might be onto something there snowy. however, my other half summed it up most distressingly last night when she spelt it out that we only needed one more goal from somewhere in a 0-0 or 1-1 and we would be in the prem right now. one shot that hit the bar or denied penalty appeal and things would be totally different.

thanks for that love.

rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

Re: The Blame Poll

by rhroyal » 15 May 2009 10:49

I know we're meant to love Coppell now but he has made plenty of errors and struggled to answer questions since January. I think luck played a big part. After the Watford "Phantom Goal" we never got any marginal decisions off the ref for a couple of months, and that decision ultimately worked against us in my view. We hit the bar against Ipswich and Sheff Utd at 0-0, Kebe missed a sitter at 0-0 against Forest. 2 of them go in we could have 2 more home wins and auto promotion. I've lost count of how many world class goals we've conceded since January. 1 v Plymouth, 1 v Forest, 1 v Ipswich. It's rare to concede so many goals of that quality in one season. Then of course we conceded 2 top strikers on Tuesday nights. Of course no defense can be blameless upon conceding, Paterson wasn't closed down and Rosenior failed to head clear effectively. However you wouldn't normally expect those circumstances to yield goals. Fine margins.

However ultimately players missed those chances against Burnley, Sheff Utd, Ipswich, Forest and Plymouth amongst others. The way we always responded to going a goal down was not acceptable, the players showed no mental strength. There has been a complete loss of form from many players and they have to be held responsible too. If we'd carried on like we had before Christmas those luck factors wouldn't have stopped us.

loyalroyal

Re: The Blame Poll

by loyalroyal » 15 May 2009 10:53

boy1985 Who's to blame?


Your crap spelling


rhroyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2639
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 10:19

Re: The Blame Poll

by rhroyal » 15 May 2009 11:00

loyalroyal
boy1985 Who's to blame?


Your crap spelling

Excuse me? Nothing wrong with those 3 words. I wouldn't put "Who's" in an essay, but this is a football forum.

User avatar
yuomi
Member
Posts: 860
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 11:20
Location: dum spiro spero

Re: The Blame Poll

by yuomi » 15 May 2009 11:07

rhroyal
loyalroyal
boy1985 Who's to blame?


Your crap spelling

Excuse me? Nothing wrong with those 3 words. I wouldn't put "Who's" in an essay, but this is a football forum.


its a total missapropriation of the word though. its whose. you wouldnt put it in an essay because itd be wrong.

West Stand Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3111
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: Working my nuts off during early retirement

Re: The Blame Poll

by West Stand Man » 15 May 2009 11:07

Dirk Gently Where's the option for "life is complicated and it'll be down to a combination of factors, not just one"?


Don't be silly, that requires intelligence to both think of the option and to describe it.
:wink:

boy1985

Re: The Blame Poll

by boy1985 » 15 May 2009 11:08

rhroyal
loyalroyal
boy1985 Who's to blame?


Your crap spelling

Excuse me? Nothing wrong with those 3 words. I wouldn't put "Who's" in an essay, but this is a football forum.


actually i think he was getting an erection over my spelling of madejski

Still Hate Futcher!
Member
Posts: 358
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 17:28
Location: Cloud 9

Re: The Blame Poll

by Still Hate Futcher! » 15 May 2009 11:09

I feel I should shoulder some of the blame as the wheels came off as soon as we switxhed pre-match pubs. Still, we like our new one so will try and weather the storm.

West Stand Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3111
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: Working my nuts off during early retirement

Re: The Blame Poll

by West Stand Man » 15 May 2009 11:20

yuomi
its a total missapropriation of the word though. its whose. you wouldnt put it in an essay because itd be wrong.


Sorry but you are wrong. I hate to defend the originator of the phrase used, but it certainly is not a place where whose is the right word. It should be written in full as who is and so, if you feel the need to abbreviate, the apostrophe is correct and who's will be quite reasonable.

However,
misappropriation is the right spelling. Sentences start with capitalised letter, and if you insist on adulterating the language do use an apostrophe - it'd (as in it would) and It's (as in it is), wouldn't as in would not).

User avatar
yuomi
Member
Posts: 860
Joined: 02 Mar 2008 11:20
Location: dum spiro spero

Re: The Blame Poll

by yuomi » 15 May 2009 11:27

West Stand Man
yuomi
its a total missapropriation of the word though. its whose. you wouldnt put it in an essay because itd be wrong.


Sorry but you are wrong. I hate to defend the originator of the phrase used, but it certainly is not a place where whose is the right word. It should be written in full as who is and so, if you feel the need to abbreviate, the apostrophe is correct and who's will be quite reasonable.

However,
misappropriation is the right spelling. Sentences start with capitalised letter, and if you insist on adulterating the language do use an apostrophe - it'd (as in it would) and It's (as in it is), wouldn't as in would not).


my total and incongruous ignoring of punctuation to one side whose is considered by the OED to be a perfectly suitable and acceptable substitute for who is e.g. whose afraid of the big bad wolf? or whose got the car keys?. i'm not stressing the point that i'm right, i'm merely looking for clarification now. you are shaking the pillars of my linguistic foundation.

http://englishplus.com/grammar/00000268.htm

hth.

ah, the team board. where the really important debates go down.
Last edited by yuomi on 15 May 2009 11:29, edited 1 time in total.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 206 guests

It is currently 18 Feb 2025 19:51