Jay Tabb is not a full back

Forest Gump
Member
Posts: 255
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 09:22

Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Forest Gump » 01 Dec 2009 00:34

I like Jay a lot. He is an energetic gutsy player but was signed as a midfield replacement for Stephen Hunt and has played in the midfield most of his career.

While deserving a lot of credit for the Reading goal both of Derby's goals and several more chances came down their left and behind our right back. With five in midfield I can't understand why Tabb was pushing forward so much and leaving spaces behind.

I think it's time for Rodger to stop fooling himself that it is good enough to improvise at this level, admit that Cummings is not up to it and start looking for a proper RB.

Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Royalee » 01 Dec 2009 02:24

First goal Ingimarsson, second goal Kebe.

Hope this helps.

User avatar
Wimb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4397
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 09:43
Location: www.thetilehurstend.com

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Wimb » 01 Dec 2009 06:27

Murty wasn't a full back when we signed him either....

The lads been a steady head during a troubled time for the back 4, long term is he the answer? the jury is out but at present the lad is the best option and deserves time to improve on some already impressive displays.

Barry the bird boggler
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8153
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 08:34
Location: in my bird boggler

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Barry the bird boggler » 01 Dec 2009 08:41

Tabb >>>>> injured Kelly >>>>>> Cummings


HTH

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6644
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Wycombe Royal » 01 Dec 2009 09:00

Wimb Murty wasn't a full back when we signed him either....

But at least Murty was right-sided.


User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6644
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Wycombe Royal » 01 Dec 2009 09:02

Forest Gump I think it's time for Rodger to stop fooling himself that it is good enough to improvise at this level, admit that Cummings is not up to it and start looking for a proper RB.

1) How do you know he is "fooling himself"?
2) Hasn't he already admitted Cummings isn't up to it by dropping him? Or do you want him to publicly announce that Cummings is crap?
3) How do you know he isn't looking for a right back?

User avatar
Wimb
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4397
Joined: 21 Nov 2005 09:43
Location: www.thetilehurstend.com

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Wimb » 01 Dec 2009 09:06

Wycombe Royal
Wimb Murty wasn't a full back when we signed him either....

But at least Murty was right-sided.


Well valid, but the point remains that just because you were signed in 1 position doesn't mean you can't learn another ;)

The Real Sandhurst Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2160
Joined: 20 Apr 2004 10:06
Location: Sandhurst

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 01 Dec 2009 09:32

Tabb is a left footed player playing at right back because we have no one else to play there as Cummings is not good enough and Kelly is injured so it is a tough ask.

Is there another left footed player playing at right back in the Premiership and Football League I doubt it!!

User avatar
Focher
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4126
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 12:04
Location: There's a sale at Pennys

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Focher » 01 Dec 2009 09:39

i actually agree with quite a lot the Gumpsmeister says, the only problem is there is nobody else. Cummings is so bad he would struggle to get in Twyford Comets first 11 at the moment, Kelly is injured and Gunnarsson is too slow.

Im as good as 100% sure we will sign someone in Jan, in my view 2 months too late as we should have pulled out all the stops to get someone on loan who plays in that position and who is right footed.

In all honesty i don't really blame Rodgers,i think he's getting a raw deal, i blame that Rodent Hammond.


Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Terminal Boardom » 01 Dec 2009 09:41

I would be happier and more confident about our defensive abilities if we had a decent, natural right back. Short Comings has had an appalling start. Good pro that Tabb is, first and foremost he is not a right back.

These threads make me laugh. To think that by changing one player for another would actually make a difference! Defensively we are a shambles and has been posted elsewhere, defending is the responsibility of the whole team startin at the front. I can not recall seeing Rasiak or Church doing much in the closing down stakes. Neither of our wingers are that great at it either. Do the coaches know what they are doing? Do they have a plan?

Why blame Hammond? It is like blaming a concentration camp guard for all the deaths brought about by the "Final Solution". He is only following orders!

Tony Le Mesmer
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3404
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 20:37
Location: Dundee in my bare feet

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Tony Le Mesmer » 01 Dec 2009 09:43

The problem stems back from not replacing Steve Swailes.

User avatar
Focher
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4126
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 12:04
Location: There's a sale at Pennys

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Focher » 01 Dec 2009 09:44

Terminal Boardom I would be happier and more confident about our defensive abilities if we had a decent, natural right back. Short Comings has had an appalling start. Good pro that Tabb is, first and foremost he is not a right back.

These threads make me laugh. To think that by changing one player for another would actually make a difference! Defensively we are a shambles and has been posted elsewhere, defending is the responsibility of the whole team startin at the front. I can not recall seeing Rasiak or Church doing much in the closing down stakes. Neither of our wingers are that great at it either. Do the coaches know what they are doing? Do they have a plan?

Why blame Hammond? It is like blaming a concentration camp guard for all the deaths brought about by the "Final Solution". He is only following orders!


Thats where i disagree TB, i think its Rodgers following the orders not Hammond.

User avatar
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2851
Joined: 18 Apr 2004 19:46

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 01 Dec 2009 09:50

Focher
Terminal Boardom I would be happier and more confident about our defensive abilities if we had a decent, natural right back. Short Comings has had an appalling start. Good pro that Tabb is, first and foremost he is not a right back.

These threads make me laugh. To think that by changing one player for another would actually make a difference! Defensively we are a shambles and has been posted elsewhere, defending is the responsibility of the whole team startin at the front. I can not recall seeing Rasiak or Church doing much in the closing down stakes. Neither of our wingers are that great at it either. Do the coaches know what they are doing? Do they have a plan?

Why blame Hammond? It is like blaming a concentration camp guard for all the deaths brought about by the "Final Solution". He is only following orders!


Thats where i disagree TB, i think its Rodgers following the orders not Hammond.


Everyone is following orders. Hammond/Rodgers can only try and make the best of the situation.


Negative_Jeff
Member
Posts: 575
Joined: 25 May 2008 20:27

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Negative_Jeff » 01 Dec 2009 10:23

Both goals came from that side on saturday but neither was down to Tabb.
All these posts but not one actually outlines why Tabb cannot play as a full back.
If he was a right footer playing left back would we be having this discussion?

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6644
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Wycombe Royal » 01 Dec 2009 10:35

Negative_Jeff If he was a right footer playing left back would we be having this discussion?

Yes we would, as that would just be the exact opposite of what we are discussing here.

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Thaumagurist* » 01 Dec 2009 10:56

Wimb Murty wasn't a full back when we signed him either....


Neither was Mick Gooding.

Very good versatile players are worthwhile having at the club. Shame that they're very rare these days.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Hoop Blah » 01 Dec 2009 11:16

Thaumagurist*
Wimb Murty wasn't a full back when we signed him either....


Neither was Mick Gooding.

Very good versatile players are worthwhile having at the club. Shame that they're very rare these days.


Rare? Are they?

We've got Gunnarsson, Cisse, Tabb who are all pretty versatile, plus nearly all our wingers have played on different sides and sometimes upfront.

CMRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2011
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 19:18

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by CMRoyal » 01 Dec 2009 11:20

Tabb may not be a full-back, but he's probably been our best and most consistent player this season. What does that say about the ones playing in their natural position?

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Thaumagurist* » 01 Dec 2009 11:24

Hoop Blah
Thaumagurist*
Wimb Murty wasn't a full back when we signed him either....


Neither was Mick Gooding.

Very good versatile players are worthwhile having at the club. Shame that they're very rare these days.


Rare? Are they?

We've got Gunnarsson, Cisse, Tabb who are all pretty versatile, plus nearly all our wingers have played on different sides and sometimes upfront.


You might be right, but I don't think Cisse is good at centre back. His first touch is sometimes terrible.

Wongle
Member
Posts: 28
Joined: 06 Oct 2008 01:11

Re: Jay Tabb is not a full back

by Wongle » 01 Dec 2009 11:25

And Long is not fit to wear the shirt!

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], WestYorksRoyal and 385 guests

It is currently 06 Jul 2024 16:04