FA response to STAR letter

User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

FA response to STAR letter

by TFF » 15 Dec 2006 12:50

I couldn't decide between an exclamation mark and a question mark at the end of the title. What is going on STAR?

With Cech's (welcome) return to training, the Cheatski media machine has started rumbling into action ahead of the boxing day rematch and there will undoubtedly be extra focus on the game.

I appreciate STAR cannot comment on the issues themselves but has anything been heard from the FA?

Barry the bird boggler
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8153
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 08:34
Location: in my bird boggler

by Barry the bird boggler » 15 Dec 2006 14:02

1 guess.

User avatar
STAR Liaison
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1408
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:58

Re: FA response to STAR letter

by STAR Liaison » 15 Dec 2006 14:19

That Friday Feeling I couldn't decide between an exclamation mark and a question mark at the end of the title. What is going on STAR?

With Cech's (welcome) return to training, the Cheatski media machine has started rumbling into action ahead of the boxing day rematch and there will undoubtedly be extra focus on the game.

I appreciate STAR cannot comment on the issues themselves but has anything been heard from the FA?


It was marked not for publication, so sorry we cannot divulge the contents.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: FA response to STAR letter

by Wycombe Royal » 15 Dec 2006 14:25

starliaison
That Friday Feeling I couldn't decide between an exclamation mark and a question mark at the end of the title. What is going on STAR?

With Cech's (welcome) return to training, the Cheatski media machine has started rumbling into action ahead of the boxing day rematch and there will undoubtedly be extra focus on the game.

I appreciate STAR cannot comment on the issues themselves but has anything been heard from the FA?


It was marked not for publication, so sorry we cannot divulge the contents.

In your view was it a satisfactory response?

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9168
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: FA response to STAR letter

by Forbury Lion » 15 Dec 2006 14:29

Wycombe Royal
starliaison
That Friday Feeling I couldn't decide between an exclamation mark and a question mark at the end of the title. What is going on STAR?

With Cech's (welcome) return to training, the Cheatski media machine has started rumbling into action ahead of the boxing day rematch and there will undoubtedly be extra focus on the game.

I appreciate STAR cannot comment on the issues themselves but has anything been heard from the FA?


It was marked not for publication, so sorry we cannot divulge the contents.

In your view was it a satisfactory response?
And do you consider the matter closed from a STAR point of view?


User avatar
SpaceCruiser
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 5590
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
Location: Desperately seeking to return home

by SpaceCruiser » 15 Dec 2006 14:47

So does this mean that Mourinho is going to get away with it? I can't believe that.

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9168
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

by Forbury Lion » 15 Dec 2006 15:31

SpaceCruiser So does this mean that Mourinho is going to get away with it? I can't believe that.
I believe it, but don't accept it.

User avatar
Warfield Royal
Member
Posts: 364
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 20:45

Re: FA response to STAR letter

by Warfield Royal » 15 Dec 2006 15:43

starliaison It was marked not for publication, so sorry we cannot divulge the contents.


Can the contents be divulged directly to a STAR member and/or read out at a STAR meeting?

STAR Voice
Member
Posts: 394
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:16

by STAR Voice » 15 Dec 2006 16:42

I would say that although a reply was received last week, the matter is definitely not closed, and a reply to the reply has already been sent to The FA.

However, it's in nobody's interest to publicly have this all flare up again - especially before 26th December - I'd be happy to make a full statement to STAR members at the Fans' Forum on Jan 11th, but I don't want to put anything else in writing about this just yet.

JK
Last edited by STAR Voice on 15 Dec 2006 17:08, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

by Royal With Cheese » 15 Dec 2006 16:53

STAR Campaigns I would say that although a reply was received last week, the matter is definitely not closed, and a reply to the reply has already been sent to The FA.

However, it's in nobody's interest to publicly have this all flare up again - especially before 26th December - I'd be happy to make a full statement to STAR members at the Fans' Forum on Jan 11th, but I don't want to put anything else in writing about this just yet.

JK

Rowling?

:shock:

Well, at least the letter must have been well written.......

User avatar
The 17 Bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3154
Joined: 24 May 2006 21:08

by The 17 Bus » 15 Dec 2006 18:58

if the reply to the reply to the reply is not satisfactory will you continue to reply?

Please reply to this post :wink:

Jerry St Clair
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2472
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 15:59
Location: Longstanton Spice Museum

by Jerry St Clair » 16 Dec 2006 21:48

The 17 Bus if the reply to the reply to the reply is not satisfactory will you continue to reply?

Please reply to this post :wink:


This is all getting a bit Yes, Minister?

Apparently, the fact that you needed to know was not known at the time that the now known need to know was known, therefore those that needed to advise and inform the Home Secretary perhaps felt the information he needed as to whether to inform the highest authority of the known information was not yet known and therefore there was no authority for the authority to be informed because the need to know was not, at that time, known or needed.

User avatar
M4 Junction 11
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1718
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 22:36
Location: Land That Time Forgot

by M4 Junction 11 » 16 Dec 2006 21:57

STAR Campaigns I would say that although a reply was received last week, the matter is definitely not closed, and a reply to the reply has already been sent to The FA.

However, it's in nobody's interest to publicly have this all flare up again - especially before 26th December - I'd be happy to make a full statement to STAR members at the Fans' Forum on Jan 11th, but I don't want to put anything else in writing about this just yet.

JK

The reply needs to be released to STAR members at some point. I'm expecting a letter with an honest summary of what the FA have said. I respect that this is still an open issue and we are waiting for a complete response from the FA before members are briefed. Respect also for STAR not allowing the authorities to brush this under the carpet!


User avatar
M4 Junction 11
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1718
Joined: 13 Jan 2006 22:36
Location: Land That Time Forgot

by M4 Junction 11 » 02 Jan 2007 10:06

I guess we'll get a reply in the post this week :roll:

Magic_Shovel
Member
Posts: 16
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:28

by Magic_Shovel » 04 Jan 2007 13:17

Jerry St Clair This is all getting a bit Yes, Minister?

Apparently, the fact that you needed to know was not known at the time that the now known need to know was known, therefore those that needed to advise and inform the Home Secretary perhaps felt the information he needed as to whether to inform the highest authority of the known information was not yet known and therefore there was no authority for the authority to be informed because the need to know was not, at that time, known or needed.


Quite possibly one of the greatest sitcoms of all time!!!

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11779
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: FA response to STAR letter

by RoyalBlue » 04 Jan 2007 13:31

starliaison
That Friday Feeling I couldn't decide between an exclamation mark and a question mark at the end of the title. What is going on STAR?

With Cech's (welcome) return to training, the Cheatski media machine has started rumbling into action ahead of the boxing day rematch and there will undoubtedly be extra focus on the game.

I appreciate STAR cannot comment on the issues themselves but has anything been heard from the FA?


It was marked not for publication, so sorry we cannot divulge the contents.


In future maybe you could append every STAR member's name to the bottom of the letter. That way they are all entitled to a reply! (although respect your reasons for not wishing to publish before the 26th December).

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

by Platypuss » 15 Jan 2007 12:26

When will those STAR members who were unable to attend the recent forum be made aware of the contents of the FA response?

The E-Star email list would seem to be an appropriate method for updating members.

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9168
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

by Forbury Lion » 15 Jan 2007 12:57

Does internal publication count as publication?

I guess the concern is that it may be forwarded on or copied and pasted onto a football website.

User avatar
TFF
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5321
Joined: 20 Jan 2006 09:17
Location: Running to the hills

by TFF » 15 Jan 2007 13:00

Can members read the letter in STAR's HQ?

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11779
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

by RoyalBlue » 17 Jan 2007 20:01

The silence on this thread and that covering the fans forum is deafening on this particular matter.

Perhaps someone who was able to attend the fans forum would care to blow the whistle on the contents of the FA letter - thus absolving the STAR officers of any blame?

Personally I suspect the only reason the FA want to keep it quiet is because they, as usual, did sweet FA.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

It is currently 28 Nov 2024 23:34