Scoreboard - One for STAR maybe ?

[Legend]

Can someone tell me why the scorboard timer counts down as opposed to up. In the early years of the Madejski it used to count upwards, thus meaning you can see how long has gone in injury time.

Anyone else agree it should revert back to counting upwards ? I know it happens on all scoreboards throughout the country, but why ?! This really really pisses me off.

[Row Z Royal]

It's probably to stop fans getting cross when the ref is trying to get a team a goal by adding more and more additional time. Similarly, they didn't used to say "...a minimum of X minutes injury time"

[RoyalBlue]

Can someone tell me why the scorboard timer counts down as opposed to up. In the early years of the Madejski it used to count upwards, thus meaning you can see how long has gone in injury time.

Anyone else agree it should revert back to counting upwards ? I know it happens on all scoreboards throughout the country, but why ?! This really really pisses me off.

No it doesn't happen at all grounds throughout the country.

Once again the club blame it on some regulation issued by the FA/league. But just like the regulations regarding standing, other clubs ignore any such regulation with impunity, whilst RFC continue with their slavish obedience.

[DelBoyRodders]

Can someone tell me why the scorboard timer counts down as opposed to up. In the early years of the Madejski it used to count upwards, thus meaning you can see how long has gone in injury time.

Anyone else agree it should revert back to counting upwards ? I know it happens on all scoreboards throughout the country, but why ?! This really really pisses me off.

No it doesn't happen at all grounds throughout the country.

Once again the club blame it on some regulation issued by the FA/league. But just like the regulations regarding standing, other clubs ignore any such regulation with impunity, whilst RFC continue with their slavish obedience.

Are you retarded?

[zac naloen]

Can someone tell me why the scorboard timer counts down as opposed to up. In the early years of the Madejski it used to count upwards, thus meaning you can see how long has gone in injury time.

Anyone else agree it should revert back to counting upwards ? I know it happens on all scoreboards throughout the country, but why ?! This really really pisses me off.

No it doesn't happen at all grounds throughout the country.

Once again the club blame it on some regulation issued by the FA/league. But just like the regulations regarding standing, other clubs ignore any such regulation with impunity, whilst RFC continue with their slavish obedience.

Do you have any actual evidence for these wild accusations?

[weybridgewanderer]

Can someone tell me why the scorboard timer counts down as opposed to up. In the early years of the Madejski it used to count upwards, thus meaning you can see how long has gone in injury time.

Anyone else agree it should revert back to counting upwards ? I know it happens on all scoreboards throughout the country, but why ?! This really really pisses me off.

No it doesn't happen at all grounds throughout the country.

Once again the club blame it on some regulation issued by the FA/league. But just like the regulations regarding standing, other clubs ignore any such regulation with impunity, whilst RFC continue with their slavish obedience.

what clubs ignore the regulation

the grounds i have been at that I remember count up (millwall) stop at 45 / 90

[RoyalBlue]

Can someone tell me why the scorboard timer counts down as opposed to up. In the early years of the Madejski it used to count upwards, thus meaning you can see how long has gone in injury time.

Anyone else agree it should revert back to counting upwards ? I know it happens on all scoreboards throughout the country, but why ?! This really really pisses me off.

No it doesn't happen at all grounds throughout the country.

Once again the club blame it on some regulation issued by the FA/league. But just like the regulations regarding standing, other clubs ignore any such regulation with impunity, whilst RFC continue with their slavish obedience.

Do you have any actual evidence for these wild accusations?

Yes, I do actually. In the past the club have said, on more than one occasion that they are unable to have the clock count up because of league regulations. I beliebve that answer has also been relayed back through STAR/a fans forum. As for clubs that ignore the regulation, Wycombe immediately springs to mind.

And no, I'm not going to trawl through HNA to find threads where this has been covered before but I'm confident that it has been, just as it was also debated on RoyalMail.

Are you retarded?

You clearly are if that is the only way you can 'debate' an issue.

what clubs ignore the regulation

the grounds i have been at that I remember count up (millwall) stop at 45 / 90

I was referring to the fact that RFC have claimed it is against the regulations to have the clock count up - not that any clubs have their clocks run past 45 minutes. But thanks for adding further evidence that other clubs do ignore this regulation if it does exist.

Of course it is typical of the old farts that run the game that they would even contemplate such a regulation. Clearly they've never heard of wrist watches that have stop watches, thus enabling thousands of fans to keep track of how long has been played anyway!

[DelBoyRodders]

Are you retarded?

You clearly are if that is the only way you can 'debate' an issue.

What is there to debate?

It's the only response possible for such a stupid thread like this, in particular your comments.

We are sitting sixth in the Premiership, but you still find time to slag the club off because they let the clock count down rather then up.

Only a retard would even care whether it was up or down. I make no apologies for calling you that.

Madejski out!!

[Magnus]

Rough day DBR?

[DelBoyRodders]

Rough day DBR?

Great day actually.

I just can't see what there is to discuss as to whether the scoreboard clock should count up or down. Even less so for someone to be so hostile towards the club about it

[Row Z Royal]

Are you retarded?

You clearly are if that is the only way you can 'debate' an issue.

What is there to debate?

It's the only response possible for such a stupid thread like this, in particular your comments.

We are sitting sixth in the Premiership, but you still find time to slag the club off because they let the clock count down rather then up.

Only a retard would even care whether it was up or down. I make no apologies for calling you that.

Madejski out!!

You should be pleased.

As you say, we are in the Top Flight Top Six, so all we have to moan about is car parking and backward clocks.

Be grateful that these are the least of our worries.

[Volvicanus]

This was brought a few seasons ago and RB is right that it was attributed to a FA regulation. I'm pretty sure it's so that there is less controversy over refs application of injury time.

[Yellow Jackets]

I think this is right, like the same reason the screen doesn't replay controversial incidents

[AbovetheI]

I personally couldn't give a toss, and this is probably the worst moan thread ever.

[zac naloen]

Yes, I do actually. In the past the club have said, on more than one occasion that they are unable to have the clock count up because of league regulations. I beliebve that answer has also been relayed back through STAR/a fans forum. As for clubs that ignore the regulation, Wycombe immediately springs to mind.

And no, I'm not going to trawl through HNA to find threads where this has been covered before but I'm confident that it has been, just as it was also debated on RoyalMail.

So you don't actually have any evidence at all then do you

[STAR Liaison]

Yes, I do actually. In the past the club have said, on more than one occasion that they are unable to have the clock count up because of league regulations. I beliebve that answer has also been relayed back through STAR/a fans forum. As for clubs that ignore the regulation, Wycombe immediately springs to mind.

As the one who asked the question I am afraid that I have to correct you. The club did not say that the clock has to count down, but that it cannot count beyond 45/90 if it counts up and hence Legend's request would not achieve his desire of seeing added on time.

It has been suggested that some clubs get around this by showing a clock next to the count down/up, but not sure if anyone actually ignores the rule and counts beyond 45/90.

[Legend]

Yes, I do actually. In the past the club have said, on more than one occasion that they are unable to have the clock count up because of league regulations. I beliebve that answer has also been relayed back through STAR/a fans forum. As for clubs that ignore the regulation, Wycombe immediately springs to mind.

As the one who asked the question I am afraid that I have to correct you. The club did not say that the clock has to count down, but that it cannot count beyond 45/90 if it counts up and hence Legend's request would not achieve his desire of seeing added on time.

It has been suggested that some clubs get around this by showing a clock next to the count down/up, but not sure if anyone actually ignores the rule and counts beyond 45/90.

Thank you

So what's the reasoning behind the clock not allowing to pass 45 / 90 minutes ?

Seems absolutley ridiculous to me.

[Stranded]

Yes, I do actually. In the past the club have said, on more than one occasion that they are unable to have the clock count up because of league regulations. I beliebve that answer has also been relayed back through STAR/a fans forum. As for clubs that ignore the regulation, Wycombe immediately springs to mind.

As the one who asked the question I am afraid that I have to correct you. The club did not say that the clock has to count down, but that it cannot count beyond 45/90 if it counts up and hence Legend's request would not achieve his desire of seeing added on time.

It has been suggested that some clubs get around this by showing a clock next to the count down/up, but not sure if anyone actually ignores the rule and counts beyond 45/90.

Thank you

So what's the reasoning behind the clock not allowing to pass 45 / 90 minutes ?

Seems absolutley ridiculous to me.

Same reason that they can't show replays of contentious issues - in case it inflames the crowd. Can you imagine what could happen if the board shows 2 mins and a winning goal is scored against the home side with the clock showing 93:24 for example.

[Forbury Lion]

In this day and age I'm sure it's technically possible for the scoreboard to show both a count down timer and a count up one, just to keep everyone happy.

Whether that's against the rules or not I don't know.

Maybe the simple solution for Legend and others is to wear a watch as that counts up.

[Legend]

Yes, I do actually. In the past the club have said, on more than one occasion that they are unable to have the clock count up because of league regulations. I beliebve that answer has also been relayed back through STAR/a fans forum. As for clubs that ignore the regulation, Wycombe immediately springs to mind.

As the one who asked the question I am afraid that I have to correct you. The club did not say that the clock has to count down, but that it cannot count beyond 45/90 if it counts up and hence Legend's request would not achieve his desire of seeing added on time.

It has been suggested that some clubs get around this by showing a clock next to the count down/up, but not sure if anyone actually ignores the rule and counts beyond 45/90.

Thank you

So what's the reasoning behind the clock not allowing to pass 45 / 90 minutes ?

Seems absolutley ridiculous to me.

Same reason that they can't show replays of contentious issues - in case it inflames the crowd. Can you imagine what could happen if the board shows 2 mins and a winning goal is scored against the home side with the clock showing 93:24 for example.

Time added on is the minimum time.

The ref aint gonna blow up ten minutes after the allocated time is he, unless he wants a riot