Simplistictly....
IN - in TV revenue, circa £65,000,000
OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
Given that the reason we were given that ticket prices were hiked by 80% odd last year was so we could build a team to compete in the Premiership, should the club be refunding some of it if it refuses to compete in the transfer/wages market and is, presumably sitting on tens of millions of pounds?
Since promotion
-
Coppelled Streets
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: 20 Jun 2006 22:43
-
Wycombe Royal
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 6672
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
- Location: Churchdown, Glos
Schards#2 Simplistictly....
IN - in TV revenue, circa £65,000,000
OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
If it is so simple, why have you left out the biggest expense?
-
Coppelled Streets
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: 20 Jun 2006 22:43
Wycombe RoyalSchards#2 Simplistictly....
IN - in TV revenue, circa £65,000,000
OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
If it is so simple, why have you left out the biggest expense?
Lindy?
-
SpaceCruiser
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 5590
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
- Location: Desperately seeking to return home
Schards#2 OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
Soccerbase says otherwise: £5,750,000 and they've even missed out Andre Bikey, so the total out really is £6,750,000. And you seem to have ignored the wages. Surely there is more out than a mere £3 mill.
SpaceCruiserSchards#2 OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
Soccerbase says otherwise: £5,750,000 and they've even missed out Andre Bikey, so the total out really is £6,750,000. And you seem to have ignored the wages. Surely there is more out than a mere £3 mill.
Does Soccerbase include the sale of Halford?
As for wages, if you take an average of £15,000 p.w for 25 players, (a high estimate) thats £19.5 million
-
SpaceCruiser
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 5590
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
- Location: Desperately seeking to return home
Schards#2SpaceCruiserSchards#2 OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
Soccerbase says otherwise: £5,750,000 and they've even missed out Andre Bikey, so the total out really is £6,750,000. And you seem to have ignored the wages. Surely there is more out than a mere £3 mill.
Does Soccerbase include the sale of Halford?
Yes, it does, but I seem to have missed out your word "net", so it's minus £2.5 million = £4,250,000.
Stranded Did the team not compete in the Premiership last season? Or did I just dream that.
Yes it did, but not as a result of the increased ticket revenue as the club has chosen to spend a fraction of the funds at its disposal.
I'm not saying the club's choice to not compete financial with pretty much every other club in the Premiership is neccessarily wrong. Just that you can't say you are charging more in order to do that, but not actually do it.
-
Wycombe Royal
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 6672
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
- Location: Churchdown, Glos
Schards#2Stranded Did the team not compete in the Premiership last season? Or did I just dream that.
Yes it did, but not as a result of the increased ticket revenue as the club has chosen to spend a fraction of the funds at its disposal.
I'm not saying the club's choice to not compete financial with pretty much every other club in the Premiership is neccessarily wrong. Just that you can't say you are charging more in order to do that, but not actually do it.
Didn't we go over this whole toopic last season about 427 times?
-
Bowman's Quiver
- Member
- Posts: 310
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 23:02
- Location: Henpecked
Wycombe RoyalSchards#2 Simplistictly....
IN - in TV revenue, circa £65,000,000
OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
If it is so simple, why have you left out the biggest expense?
Because that wouldn't suit his agenda
-
Stranded
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 20165
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
- Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags
Schards#2Stranded Did the team not compete in the Premiership last season? Or did I just dream that.
Yes it did, but not as a result of the increased ticket revenue as the club has chosen to spend a fraction of the funds at its disposal.
I'm not saying the club's choice to not compete financial with pretty much every other club in the Premiership is neccessarily wrong. Just that you can't say you are charging more in order to do that, but not actually do it.
Ok, so for example we'd gone out and spent say another £10m last year and it had gone wrong would that have been better?
I can see where you are coming from but each club goes about it's business in it's own way and I for one am happy that we are not paying over the odds for players with limited Prem experience such as Koumas and Kamara who have moved on in the last few days.
I'd much rather we continue to go about things as we are and go from there.
-
Harps stay sharp
- Member
- Posts: 111
- Joined: 12 Jan 2005 13:59
Schards#2 Simplistictly....
IN - in TV revenue, circa £65,000,000
OUT - in net transfers, circa £3,000,000
Given that the reason we were given that ticket prices were hiked by 80% odd last year was so we could build a team to compete in the Premiership, should the club be refunding some of it if it refuses to compete in the transfer/wages market and is, presumably sitting on tens of millions of pounds?
But the club have stated the money is available for the Manager to spend. Coppell was well within his budget last season.
So the Club haven't misled anyone, i am sure the money for the increase in 2006/07 is still available for the right player/s.
-
SpaceCruiser
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 5590
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 14:17
- Location: Desperately seeking to return home
Wycombe RoyalSchards#2Stranded Did the team not compete in the Premiership last season? Or did I just dream that.
Yes it did, but not as a result of the increased ticket revenue as the club has chosen to spend a fraction of the funds at its disposal.
I'm not saying the club's choice to not compete financial with pretty much every other club in the Premiership is neccessarily wrong. Just that you can't say you are charging more in order to do that, but not actually do it.
Didn't we go over this whole toopic last season about 427 times?
How did you arrive at that figure?
-
Wycombe Royal
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 6672
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
- Location: Churchdown, Glos
SpaceCruiserWycombe RoyalSchards#2Stranded Did the team not compete in the Premiership last season? Or did I just dream that.
Yes it did, but not as a result of the increased ticket revenue as the club has chosen to spend a fraction of the funds at its disposal.
I'm not saying the club's choice to not compete financial with pretty much every other club in the Premiership is neccessarily wrong. Just that you can't say you are charging more in order to do that, but not actually do it.
Didn't we go over this whole toopic last season about 427 times?
How did you arrive at that figure?
I think I double counted one of the discussions. It was actually 426 times.
-
Harold
-
Wycombe Royal
- Hob Nob Addict
- Posts: 6672
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
- Location: Churchdown, Glos
-
Coppelled Streets
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 1679
- Joined: 20 Jun 2006 22:43
-
Harold
Wycombe RoyalHarold If Reading fail, then the board will be to blame.
Why would they? It has been stated that the funds are available, so surely then it must be Hammond and Coppell who would be to blame for not spending it?
Harold gets it wrong again when attempting a fishing trip.
it says funds available, but we dont know how much!!
-
Stranded
-
Hob Nob Subscriber
- Posts: 20165
- Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:42
- Location: Propping up the bar in the Nags
HaroldWycombe RoyalHarold If Reading fail, then the board will be to blame.
Why would they? It has been stated that the funds are available, so surely then it must be Hammond and Coppell who would be to blame for not spending it?
Harold gets it wrong again when attempting a fishing trip.
it says funds available, but we dont know how much!!
Reading do not and never have had a set transfer budget.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 27 guests
It is currently 28 Sep 2024 11:06