by Royalphil » 20 Feb 2007 12:27
by SpaceCruiser » 20 Feb 2007 12:28
Rawlie19SpaceCruiser How many ASTHs are HSTHs?
I would think that most of them if not all. You have to be pretty dedicated to go to all the away games and I would be surprised if they then didn't want to support them at home also.
by Stranded » 20 Feb 2007 12:31
Rawlie19StrandedRawlie19el_presidenteMr Brightside On hold now, and they report it sold outbeen on hold for 45 mins!
yep, recorded message says they've sold out. They really need to change those Royalty Points bands
If anyone who has 601 points or more missed out on a ticket, then yes, they need to look at the banding. If not then they've done the job surely?
I don't like the idea of an AST subscriber without the required points getting a ticket, but surely 99% of them will also have a HST and so that together with the AST will give them enough points anyway?
Why not? An AST holder is comitting to paying for a ticket for every game regardless of opposition on even if they can make the game. Everybody else is not making the same commitment and going to away games as and when.
Why not? Because the club bought in a points system to make sure that the loyalist of fans can go to the games. If someone only has half the amount of points needed but still gets to go to a game I don't see this as particularly fair. And it's not like they're committing by paying an upfront fee. But like I said, I can't see any AST holders not having the right amount of points anyway, by virtue of the fact that they will have been collecting points for every game.
by Schards#2 » 20 Feb 2007 12:35
StrandedSchards#2StrandedSchards#2starliaisonSymposiummeeky_no9 Not bad and no change in Points bands which is very good news
I would have preferred a change in points band. Make the first day for those with >700 points, second day >650 points, so that we don't have too many people clogging up the queue...
We asked for this at a recent meeting with the club and were told that as Man U was the only away game that people with 100 points or less were not able to go to they did not intend changing the bands. This will be the next real test.
Can I suggest that both the club and STAR have failed the test miserably?
It was blindingly obvious that the bandings for this game were unsuitable though neither the club nor STAR seem to care in the slightest.
People with the most points got their chance yesterday and bought. People in the next band got there's with what was left. I'm struggling to see how they could have changed it. They would have got complaints anyway.
Say they move the bands to 700+ for yesterday, 650 for today, 600 for tomorrow and then say 580 on Thursday we would have been in the same situation but just come Thursday.
That would have given a better opportunity for the available tickets to go to those with the most points rather than those with the highest number of points only having one day to use this advantage and those below having no advantage over those 30 points lower.
Incidentally, the on day also fell on the sale of replay tickets when phone lines were jammed so anyone who couldn't personally get to the stadium was buggered.
Replay date was unfortunate timing and the club did the best they could by allowing sales from Saturday evening online for that and many used it before it crashed on Sunday/Monday.
I take you point that it would have given people with the real top end of points an extra day or two but the fact is the majority of the tickets available went to those with the highest points available and the rest to those in the upper reaches of the next tranche.
I'd have loved a ticket but knew that the chances of any being available come Weds were slim - that's life. When there are more people than tickets available people will always miss out and what even system the club put in place there will always be those that miss out and blame them to ease their own frustration.
by Huntley & Palmer » 20 Feb 2007 12:35
Rawlie19StrandedRawlie19el_presidenteMr Brightside On hold now, and they report it sold outbeen on hold for 45 mins!
yep, recorded message says they've sold out. They really need to change those Royalty Points bands
If anyone who has 601 points or more missed out on a ticket, then yes, they need to look at the banding. If not then they've done the job surely?
I don't like the idea of an AST subscriber without the required points getting a ticket, but surely 99% of them will also have a HST and so that together with the AST will give them enough points anyway?
Why not? An AST holder is comitting to paying for a ticket for every game regardless of opposition on even if they can make the game. Everybody else is not making the same commitment and going to away games as and when.
Why not? Because the club bought in a points system to make sure that the loyalist of fans can go to the games. If someone only has half the amount of points needed but still gets to go to a game I don't see this as particularly fair. And it's not like they're committing by paying an upfront fee. But like I said, I can't see any AST holders not having the right amount of points anyway, by virtue of the fact that they will have been collecting points for every game.
by Rawlie19 » 20 Feb 2007 12:36
StrandedRawlie19StrandedRawlie19el_presidenteMr Brightside On hold now, and they report it sold outbeen on hold for 45 mins!
yep, recorded message says they've sold out. They really need to change those Royalty Points bands
If anyone who has 601 points or more missed out on a ticket, then yes, they need to look at the banding. If not then they've done the job surely?
I don't like the idea of an AST subscriber without the required points getting a ticket, but surely 99% of them will also have a HST and so that together with the AST will give them enough points anyway?
Why not? An AST holder is comitting to paying for a ticket for every game regardless of opposition on even if they can make the game. Everybody else is not making the same commitment and going to away games as and when.
Why not? Because the club bought in a points system to make sure that the loyalist of fans can go to the games. If someone only has half the amount of points needed but still gets to go to a game I don't see this as particularly fair. And it's not like they're committing by paying an upfront fee. But like I said, I can't see any AST holders not having the right amount of points anyway, by virtue of the fact that they will have been collecting points for every game.
But surelt committing 100% to buying a ticket for your club's games over a season without knowing what may happen over that time is the most loyal you can be?
Each AST will pay for a ticket each game but they committed to that in July. You may well go to each away game, but you have the freedom of knot having to commit until roughly a fortnight before the game. As a result, you will know if there is a game you can't make and not look to buy one whereas the AST holder is stuck buying the ticket regardless.
by Rawlie19 » 20 Feb 2007 12:37
Huntley & PalmerRawlie19StrandedRawlie19el_presidenteMr Brightside On hold now, and they report it sold outbeen on hold for 45 mins!
yep, recorded message says they've sold out. They really need to change those Royalty Points bands
If anyone who has 601 points or more missed out on a ticket, then yes, they need to look at the banding. If not then they've done the job surely?
I don't like the idea of an AST subscriber without the required points getting a ticket, but surely 99% of them will also have a HST and so that together with the AST will give them enough points anyway?
Why not? An AST holder is comitting to paying for a ticket for every game regardless of opposition on even if they can make the game. Everybody else is not making the same commitment and going to away games as and when.
Why not? Because the club bought in a points system to make sure that the loyalist of fans can go to the games. If someone only has half the amount of points needed but still gets to go to a game I don't see this as particularly fair. And it's not like they're committing by paying an upfront fee. But like I said, I can't see any AST holders not having the right amount of points anyway, by virtue of the fact that they will have been collecting points for every game.
Wrong on all accounts. I have spoken with many an AST holder, most are home ST holders and quite a lot are exiles that find it easier to follow RFC away than make the journey to Reading for home games only. Royalty points were only brought in to allow the more loyal HOME FAN get a ticket for home games, hence why away games are not worth as many points. That is why exiles are reliant on the AST to guarantee they get tickets to Arsenal, Man U, Liverpool as these are the only games they can go to. They would not necessarily have enough points to get a ticket for a home game.
I am an AST and HST holder and have just crept over the 500 point barrier with my Arsenal ticket. I have only missed four away games all season, the missed games saw my tickets sold to a mate that wanted to go.
by Huntley & Palmer » 20 Feb 2007 12:38
by Rawlie19 » 20 Feb 2007 12:40
Huntley & Palmer Some people have other things in their lives other than RFC, it seems the people that moan the loudest clearly don't.
by Huntley & Palmer » 20 Feb 2007 12:44
Schards#2StrandedSchards#2StrandedSchards#2starliaisonSymposiummeeky_no9 Not bad and no change in Points bands which is very good news
I would have preferred a change in points band. Make the first day for those with >700 points, second day >650 points, so that we don't have too many people clogging up the queue...
We asked for this at a recent meeting with the club and were told that as Man U was the only away game that people with 100 points or less were not able to go to they did not intend changing the bands. This will be the next real test.
Can I suggest that both the club and STAR have failed the test miserably?
It was blindingly obvious that the bandings for this game were unsuitable though neither the club nor STAR seem to care in the slightest.
People with the most points got their chance yesterday and bought. People in the next band got there's with what was left. I'm struggling to see how they could have changed it. They would have got complaints anyway.
Say they move the bands to 700+ for yesterday, 650 for today, 600 for tomorrow and then say 580 on Thursday we would have been in the same situation but just come Thursday.
That would have given a better opportunity for the available tickets to go to those with the most points rather than those with the highest number of points only having one day to use this advantage and those below having no advantage over those 30 points lower.
Incidentally, the on day also fell on the sale of replay tickets when phone lines were jammed so anyone who couldn't personally get to the stadium was buggered.
Replay date was unfortunate timing and the club did the best they could by allowing sales from Saturday evening online for that and many used it before it crashed on Sunday/Monday.
I take you point that it would have given people with the real top end of points an extra day or two but the fact is the majority of the tickets available went to those with the highest points available and the rest to those in the upper reaches of the next tranche.
I'd have loved a ticket but knew that the chances of any being available come Weds were slim - that's life. When there are more people than tickets available people will always miss out and what even system the club put in place there will always be those that miss out and blame them to ease their own frustration.
There's no hurry to sell these tickets though, the game's still a couple of weeks away and we've sold out slightly over 24 hours after going on sale. Do you not concede that the bandings could have been more staggered?
The replay is inconvenient but was entirely forseeable as a possibility.
I should say that I have enough points and have a ticket but, if I didn't have a brother who was happy to go and queue at the ground, I either would not have or would have had to sit on a premium phone for an hour or two at work. I'm sure some 601+ points holders won't have tickets because they couldn't get to the ground or sit for hours on the phone in the 24 hour window offered them.
by Spirit of Elm Park » 20 Feb 2007 12:47
M BrookSpirit of Elm Park 500 left this morning. (source: Ticket Office)
Queue of about 200 this morning. (over the hour 10-11)
I doubt they will make midday.
Queued for 45 minutes but got 5 tickets no probs. Seemed to be plenty left.
Maybe most of those queuing are after ManU replay tickets rather than Arsenal. Maybe some people don't have a bottomless pit of cash and have to choose.
by Lower West » 20 Feb 2007 13:35
by EASTENDER MARKY » 20 Feb 2007 13:44
Lower West When Reading were going so well least season in the Championship I don't recall their being 3,000 away fans at Burnley ....................![]()
A paltry two Royalty points was the reward.............![]()
I refused to pay excessive money to watch Feynord in a friendly so missed out on 20 points !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Yet I am not complaining as to me the Royalty Points system is as fair as any system will ever be.
by Silver Fox » 20 Feb 2007 13:46
by Stranded » 20 Feb 2007 13:47
Schards#2StrandedSchards#2StrandedSchards#2starliaisonSymposiummeeky_no9 Not bad and no change in Points bands which is very good news
I would have preferred a change in points band. Make the first day for those with >700 points, second day >650 points, so that we don't have too many people clogging up the queue...
We asked for this at a recent meeting with the club and were told that as Man U was the only away game that people with 100 points or less were not able to go to they did not intend changing the bands. This will be the next real test.
Can I suggest that both the club and STAR have failed the test miserably?
It was blindingly obvious that the bandings for this game were unsuitable though neither the club nor STAR seem to care in the slightest.
People with the most points got their chance yesterday and bought. People in the next band got there's with what was left. I'm struggling to see how they could have changed it. They would have got complaints anyway.
Say they move the bands to 700+ for yesterday, 650 for today, 600 for tomorrow and then say 580 on Thursday we would have been in the same situation but just come Thursday.
That would have given a better opportunity for the available tickets to go to those with the most points rather than those with the highest number of points only having one day to use this advantage and those below having no advantage over those 30 points lower.
Incidentally, the on day also fell on the sale of replay tickets when phone lines were jammed so anyone who couldn't personally get to the stadium was buggered.
Replay date was unfortunate timing and the club did the best they could by allowing sales from Saturday evening online for that and many used it before it crashed on Sunday/Monday.
I take you point that it would have given people with the real top end of points an extra day or two but the fact is the majority of the tickets available went to those with the highest points available and the rest to those in the upper reaches of the next tranche.
I'd have loved a ticket but knew that the chances of any being available come Weds were slim - that's life. When there are more people than tickets available people will always miss out and what even system the club put in place there will always be those that miss out and blame them to ease their own frustration.
There's no hurry to sell these tickets though, the game's still a couple of weeks away and we've sold out slightly over 24 hours after going on sale. Do you not concede that the bandings could have been more staggered?
The replay is inconvenient but was entirely forseeable as a possibility.
I should say that I have enough points and have a ticket but, if I didn't have a brother who was happy to go and queue at the ground, I either would not have or would have had to sit on a premium phone for an hour or two at work. I'm sure some 601+ points holders won't have tickets because they couldn't get to the ground or sit for hours on the phone in the 24 hour window offered them.
by Irvinchangeyaname » 20 Feb 2007 13:48
by Stranded » 20 Feb 2007 13:49
EASTENDER MARKYLower West When Reading were going so well least season in the Championship I don't recall their being 3,000 away fans at Burnley ....................![]()
A paltry two Royalty points was the reward.............![]()
I refused to pay excessive money to watch Feynord in a friendly so missed out on 20 points !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Yet I am not complaining as to me the Royalty Points system is as fair as any system will ever be.
Definatly agree with you. It is unfair that the fans that travelled to the likes of Burnley, Leeds, Preston etc could have less points than someone that went to the Feyenoord friendly. You would of had to do 10 away games to make up the points that someone else got by going to the Feyenoord friendly.
by Huntley & Palmer » 20 Feb 2007 13:50
EASTENDER MARKYLower West When Reading were going so well least season in the Championship I don't recall their being 3,000 away fans at Burnley ....................![]()
A paltry two Royalty points was the reward.............![]()
I refused to pay excessive money to watch Feynord in a friendly so missed out on 20 points !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!![]()
Yet I am not complaining as to me the Royalty Points system is as fair as any system will ever be.
Definatly agree with you. It is unfair that the fans that travelled to the likes of Burnley, Leeds, Preston etc could have less points than someone that went to the Feyenoord friendly. You would of had to do 10 away games to make up the points that someone else got by going to the Feyenoord friendly.
by lozz2601 » 20 Feb 2007 15:53
by Royal Lady » 20 Feb 2007 16:13
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 25 guests