RoyalBlueSnowflake RoyalBrogue
Isn't that barely above shitting in the sink?
It is indeed.Food Standards Agency definitions are :
5. Hygiene standards are very good
4. Hygiene standards are good
3. Hygiene standards are generally satisfactory
2. Some improvement is necessary
1. Major improvement is necessary
0. Urgent improvement is required
From what I recall a score of 1 also means the inspector also has little confidence in the current management of the catering establishment.
We once made the mistake of eating at a Lebanese restaurant in Bristol which hadn't displayed its 'Score on the Door' (it had 1 at the time) and soon realised why, as we watched a mouse happily running between the tables and right across the path of a waitress who seemed to regard it as an everyday occurrence. And no, it wasn't a hamster!
I certainly wouldn't buy food from a caterer that scores so low and I don't really understand why the club didn't use the rating to justify a red card for Compass.
I imagine anyone prepared to run a once a week catering set up for football fans requiring scores of staff is going to be hiring temps for it. Cheap temps. Who don't give a shit. Except in the sink.
Which is why blue collar was so good, because they gig around, they can use much the same people as they would normally through the week.
But yeah, if the club don't have a contract clause for poor food hygiene they need to reconsider who is looking at their contracts.