Billy The Fish Maybe they felt if the crowd couldn't be bothered to turn up then they couldn't be bothered with the tannoy. Anyone know what the attendance was? Oh, it's on the OS. 9,267. Poor show.
Looks like the bribe didn't work then.
by Stranded » 13 Aug 2006 11:52
Billy The Fish Maybe they felt if the crowd couldn't be bothered to turn up then they couldn't be bothered with the tannoy. Anyone know what the attendance was? Oh, it's on the OS. 9,267. Poor show.
by Tony Le Mesmer » 13 Aug 2006 12:13
StrandedBilly The Fish Maybe they felt if the crowd couldn't be bothered to turn up then they couldn't be bothered with the tannoy. Anyone know what the attendance was? Oh, it's on the OS. 9,267. Poor show.
Looks like the bribe didn't work then.
by Royalshow » 13 Aug 2006 20:22
Row Z Royal Surprisingly, the PA is working even less well than it was at the back end of last season. They need to turn it up a big so that we can here what's being said over the noise of our fans ()
by The Cube » 13 Aug 2006 20:53
by The_Cat » 13 Aug 2006 21:29
It's sunday.The Cube I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
by earley_royals » 13 Aug 2006 23:47
The_CatIt's sunday.The Cube I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
by The_Cat » 13 Aug 2006 23:59
I was replying to The Cube saying "scandalously I have not yet had a reply".earley_royalsThe_CatIt's sunday.The Cube I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
And they will read it tomorrow morning, msot probably.![]()
Problem?
by earley_royals » 14 Aug 2006 00:06
The_CatI was replying to The Cube saying "scandalously I have not yet had a reply".earley_royalsThe_CatIt's sunday.The Cube I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
And they will read it tomorrow morning, msot probably.![]()
Problem?
by ellpryjon » 14 Aug 2006 09:46
Tony Le Mesmer IT IS A SPEAKER SYSTEM, NOT A TANNOY. TANNOY IS A BRAND NAME.
by The_Cat » 14 Aug 2006 11:27
Or not.earley_royalsThe_CatI was replying to The Cube saying "scandalously I have not yet had a reply".earley_royalsThe_CatIt's sunday.The Cube I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
And they will read it tomorrow morning, msot probably.![]()
Problem?
I'd imagine he was being sarcastic.
by biscuitman » 14 Aug 2006 12:35
IT IS A SPEAKER SYSTEM, NOT A TANNOY. TANNOY IS A BRAND NAME
by purleyroyal » 14 Aug 2006 12:46
by Tony Le Mesmer » 14 Aug 2006 13:15
biscuitmanIT IS A SPEAKER SYSTEM, NOT A TANNOY. TANNOY IS A BRAND NAME
Who the hell calls it the speaker system???!
by The Cube » 14 Aug 2006 13:25
The_CatIt's sunday. :roll:The Cube I e-mailed the club about the speakers a few hours ago (before seeing this thread). Scandalously I have not yet had a reply.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 83 guests