No Fixed Abode IMO, only kids should be allowed to wear the latest shirt. Adults are allowed to wear a retro one or better still, not one.
Do you like your men shirtless kes?
by sandman » 08 Jul 2014 11:00
No Fixed Abode IMO, only kids should be allowed to wear the latest shirt. Adults are allowed to wear a retro one or better still, not one.
sandmanNo Fixed Abode IMO, only kids should be allowed to wear the latest shirt. Adults are allowed to wear a retro one or better still, not one.
Do you like your men shirtless kes?
by Sutekh » 08 Jul 2014 12:26
by Brum Royal » 08 Jul 2014 12:33
by TFF » 08 Jul 2014 13:45
Sutekh Mansell inspires new strip
#ThanksJack.
by JayRoyal » 08 Jul 2014 15:49
No Fixed Abode IMO, only kids should be allowed to wear the latest shirt. Adults are allowed to wear a retro one or better still, not one.
JayRoyalNo Fixed Abode IMO, only kids should be allowed to wear the latest shirt. Adults are allowed to wear a retro one or better still, not one.
If thats what you're into, I'd rather our fans remained clothed
by sandman » 08 Jul 2014 16:28
by JayRoyal » 08 Jul 2014 16:30
sandman It was a genuine question m8 not a joke.
What with you posting that gif the other week of your favourite pop singer I just wondered if that was generally how you liked your men.
by winchester_royal » 08 Jul 2014 17:34
by sandman » 08 Jul 2014 17:42
winchester_royal What is Kes' opinion on adults trying (and failing) to wind up people on an internet forum
sandman It was a genuine question m8 not a joke.
What with you posting that gif the other week of your favourite pop singer I just wondered if that was generally how you liked your men.
by winchester_royal » 08 Jul 2014 19:09
No Fixed Abodewinchester_royal What is Kes' opinion on adults trying (and failing) to wind up people on an internet forum
I don't think anyone is trying to wind anyone up on this board tbh. People have different opinions in life and things in general. If you get wound up by comments on new football kits for example, which you have as you've made this comment, I think you need to take a look at yourself rather than try and put the onus on someone else.
by Ian Royal » 08 Jul 2014 20:38
RoyalBlueIan RoyalRoyalBlue I wouldn't call an extra fiver on top of £40 quite low inflation!
12.5% increase across 10 - 15 years is far far below RPI in the same time. Hell, RPI was about 5.7% in just one year not that long ago. Maths has never been your strong point, has it.
You really are an utter **** aren't you. Mr pompous git personified. Always have to throw in an insult rather than just argue your point. Just what exactly do you know about my mathematical ability!
How long ago was inflation at that point? And which figure, from the several that our politicians like to switch between to suit their needs, are you relying on? I assume you are also aware that the headline inflation figures relate to a 'basket' of items and that there is a specific index for clothing. So what has clothing price inflation been running at? Are you really claiming that shirts were £40 ten to fifteen years ago?!
Finally, I was addressing the fact that there has been a big hike in shirt prices this time around and that £45 is a lot of money for a very cheaply producible walking advertisement, which will be out of date and selling for a tenner about eight month's after it is first available. And yes, I will be exercising my 'right' not to buy!
by Readingfanman » 09 Jul 2014 16:32
by winchester_royal » 09 Jul 2014 16:59
Readingfanman If people are "exercising their right not to buy", then what the oxf*rd are they moaning about the price for?
by winchester_royal » 09 Jul 2014 17:17
by royalZILLAAA » 09 Jul 2014 17:43
by akranes » 09 Jul 2014 18:09
winchester_royal
The kits look quite good in person.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests