by melonhead » 17 Jul 2012 15:25
by blindedbythelights » 17 Jul 2012 15:26
by melonhead » 17 Jul 2012 15:28
by blindedbythelights » 17 Jul 2012 15:31
starliaisonblindedbythelights No offence and all that but STAR has been next to awful under your tenure, things can only get better from here
none taken. It has nevertheless grown in numbers and in the opinion of others both locally and nationally,which is enough for me.
by Hoop Blah » 17 Jul 2012 15:32
melonhead id imagine looking after its own members was its raisin detra
why would it try to canvass opinion from a load of unnafiliated types?
by STAR Liaison » 17 Jul 2012 15:32
Hoop Blah It's not the way it's ever appeared to be handled from an HNA posters point of view though.
All we ever read on here is that you can't take anything posted on here back to STAR or the club because of the anonymity. If anyone has an issue it's usually met with a 'send us an email' response and we'll look into it.
I'd always assume that you don't just filter out all the good suggestions that get made on the board, but there's very little in the way of recognition of what's been taken away as food for thought and discussion at STAR and what's been dismissed as HNA just having a moan.
by Hoop Blah » 17 Jul 2012 15:37
by bigmike » 17 Jul 2012 15:39
Hoop Blah I think I've been on the STAR website 2, maybe 3 times in my life, so no I'm afraid I've never dug around reading meeting minutes and such like on there.
Do you expect people to? I didn't know anything like that existed either.
by leicsRoyal » 17 Jul 2012 15:46
by southbank1871 » 17 Jul 2012 15:48
by melonhead » 17 Jul 2012 15:55
Hoop Blahmelonhead id imagine looking after its own members was its raisin detra
why would it try to canvass opinion from a load of unnafiliated types?
Because it's stated aims are to represent it's members, Reading supporters and the community.
I'd imagine they also want as many members in STAR as possible. That's not going to happen if they don't try and find out what those people not already members actually want from their group.
by leicsRoyal » 17 Jul 2012 15:55
southbank1871 Not sure if serious.
by TFF » 17 Jul 2012 15:56
leicsRoyal send to the club for vetting
by melonhead » 17 Jul 2012 15:57
leicsRoyalsouthbank1871 Not sure if serious.
Totally serious.
What a great opportunity for STAR to increase their membership. Get the notes typed up, send to the club for vetting and then stick them out in the big wide world.
Great PR for the club
Great PR and advertising for STAR
by STAR Liaison » 17 Jul 2012 15:58
Hoop Blah I think I've been on the STAR website 2, maybe 3 times in my life, so no I'm afraid I've never dug around reading meeting minutes and such like on there.
Do you expect people to? I didn't know anything like that existed either.
by leicsRoyal » 17 Jul 2012 16:05
melonheadleicsRoyalsouthbank1871 Not sure if serious.
Totally serious.
What a great opportunity for STAR to increase their membership. Get the notes typed up, send to the club for vetting and then stick them out in the big wide world.
Great PR for the club
Great PR and advertising for STAR
its one of the only reasons youd join star though isnt it? to get this kind of inside info
if you dont get the coaches, why else would you bother
by The Rouge » 17 Jul 2012 16:07
starliaison I agree about Club Policies and that is what I read most.
I think the problem is that there is no collective of Reading fans. STAR attempts to represent them, but we do need them to bring us their problems/suggestions We can't guarantee to succeed but, as far as I am aware, any email is taken seriously. We all tend to have our friends at football but I feel that I have a wide range of Reading fans coming to me with problems. Through being Chairman I have got to know a lot of Reading supporters that I would not have known otherwise; it is not perfect but it is more representative than I would have been just talking to the people around me, or in the bar or friends. There is always room for improvement but you do need to start from somewhere.
starliaison
Quite agree and you are stating the way I approach it, but I am pointing out where there are weaknesses. I have been told at a management meeting that 'there are a lot of other supporters than those on HNA' but pointing out that it is a legitimate source of fan opinion still falls at the anonymity.
by melonhead » 17 Jul 2012 16:09
negative discrimination at worst
by cmonurz » 17 Jul 2012 16:26
by Royal Lady » 17 Jul 2012 17:27
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests