by dean horrix legend » 13 May 2009 08:25
by soggy biscuit » 13 May 2009 08:26
by toppy » 13 May 2009 08:28
by Rex » 13 May 2009 10:23
by mr_number » 13 May 2009 10:27
by brendywendy » 13 May 2009 10:51
by Schards#2 » 13 May 2009 11:15
by Barry the bird boggler » 13 May 2009 11:21
by Royal_Belly » 13 May 2009 11:30
by Royal_Belly » 13 May 2009 11:38
by Rex » 13 May 2009 11:51
by Maguire » 13 May 2009 18:59
Schards#2 Worse still was the number of fans streaming for the exits with half an hour to go - shame on you
by North Somerset Royal » 13 May 2009 19:12
royalexile Not one person within 6 places either side of me was an ST holder.
by Sarah Star » 13 May 2009 20:05
by Humanistic » 13 May 2009 23:39
by Rex » 14 May 2009 06:23
North Somerset Royalroyalexile Not one person within 6 places either side of me was an ST holder.
How do you know? Did you ask to see their tickets? I have an ST in Upper West but was in East last night for a change. As the game was not covered by the ST I suspect a lot of people took the opportunity to change seats.
by Sarah Star » 14 May 2009 09:02
Humanistic Whilst not wishing to get in the way of Reading fan-bashing, it's worth noting that in their best season in years Burnley only averaged 13,000 at home (i.e. the fourth worst attended team in the division). Considering how we lost the plot at home over the last few months, to average just under 20,000 was quite a good effort I thought. The play-off semi was bit of an odd one, probably a combination of being on TV, STH having to pay for another match and the belief that we were never going to win at home.
by Royal Lady » 14 May 2009 09:17
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 14 May 2009 09:22
There were lots of people around me who don't usually sit there - I suspect it's more to do with the fact that ST holders were only given one day to renew their ST seat - many were too late and other people then picked the better seats as they were on offer.
by fridays child » 14 May 2009 10:44
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests