by Archie's penalty » 25 Apr 2007 00:42
by Woodcote Royal » 25 Apr 2007 00:46
Alan PartridgeWoodcote Royal I apologise for not realising just how vast those blinkers are
Think catchment area, think what crowds we were getting at EP in the earley 90's and think of all those other blinkered fans who, just a few years ago, didn't think we'd sell out the Mad Stad every week and, perhaps, just perhaps, you might see the bigger picture...................but I won't hold my breath.
This season is a novelty, (some, not many but some people are only here and have these season tckets to see the opposition or because Reading are in the Premier League for the first time, novelties wear off) if not why weren't they all here two years ago? It was cheaper then too!!
Next season there will be games where you can get tickets on the day, especially if we aren't doing as well as we are this season.
The thought of a 38,000 ground is very exciting but in my view a totally unrealistic total if we are talking about filling it every week. There is ZERO chance of Reading v Charlton or Reading v Wigan having a 38,000 crowd. We'll be lucky to get 25,000.
The only chance that it could be a manageable crowd is if we got an Abramovich. Someone who just spent ridiuclous money, got world class players here then people would come from wherever to watch us. You could get a Chelsea ticket 5 years ago easy as you like, not these days. Why? because they have the best players, but he people 'following' Chelsea at the minute won't last the course.
I'd say Reading at the minute has a core of around 16,000 supporters, i really can't see us (even if we went down) getting below 15-16,000 for a home game anymore. However perspective is needed, yes this club is growing and will continue to grow but to say we can be bigger than Arsenal is farcical.
by Compo's Hat » 25 Apr 2007 01:36
by Royalee » 25 Apr 2007 01:43
by Very near...far away » 25 Apr 2007 03:22
by Behindu » 25 Apr 2007 06:35
Very near...far away I always worry a bit when suits start going on about "brand" - it's nearly always a sign that the actual playing football side of things is coming a distant second to the financial side. Granted - money is what the Premiership is all about but it still wrankles.
by Stranded » 25 Apr 2007 08:15
BehinduVery near...far away I always worry a bit when suits start going on about "brand" - it's nearly always a sign that the actual playing football side of things is coming a distant second to the financial side. Granted - money is what the Premiership is all about but it still wrankles.
Although if you look at the clubs with the strongest 'brands' they also have pretty strong footballing traditions, and a lot of trophies - Man Utd, Real Madrid, Celtic, Barcelona, Liverpool....
There isn;t too much mileage in developing a 'brand' and getting relegated, you need to be successful or else no one wants to be associated with you.
I'm get a bit edgy when people start using terms such as 'suits'. You'd think the people who run RFC had just joined us from a management consultancy ! Our senior people have all been there since we were a struggling club at crumbling EP and have seen us through to where we are now. Love them or loath them I think they deserve a little respect - they haven't exactly neglected th eplaying side !
by Sir Rodney Effing » 25 Apr 2007 09:42
by zac naloen » 25 Apr 2007 09:49
Sir Rodney Effing There is one thing people are forgetting here: Who has heard of Reading outside of the UK? There has been talk of our catchment area etc. but if we're going to realise this potential Howe is talking of, we need support all over the world - not just Reading, Bracknell and Basingstoke. LA Galaxy have made £6M out of Beckham since Goldenballs signed for them (shirt sales etc), has Seol done the same for us? Potential is a strange word, Bullivent is potentially the best manager in the world you know. Still, who would have thought when that old cab driver was in charge, we would potentially be in line for a place in Europe in less than ten years time [at the time of his brief reign over the Royals]?
by Sir Rodney Effing » 25 Apr 2007 09:57
by Alan Partridge » 25 Apr 2007 10:08
Royalee Europe?! You're having a laugh - you'd have to be a grade A idiot to suggest little Reading'd get into Europe.
by Stranded » 25 Apr 2007 10:10
Alan PartridgeRoyalee Europe?! You're having a laugh - you'd have to be a grade A idiot to suggest little Reading'd get into Europe.
That's actually that ridiuclous even when we were in the 2nd division, that's a realistic aim that any club that goes the right way could achieve. Saying Reading will be bigger than Arsenal though is just
by RG30 » 25 Apr 2007 10:12
by Alan Partridge » 25 Apr 2007 10:15
StrandedAlan PartridgeRoyalee Europe?! You're having a laugh - you'd have to be a grade A idiot to suggest little Reading'd get into Europe.
That's actually that ridiuclous even when we were in the 2nd division, that's a realistic aim that any club that goes the right way could achieve. Saying Reading will be bigger than Arsenal though is just
As I said though what would you rather:
A board who are targetting becoming one of the biggest clubs in the country over time or a board who are just happy to be here and make up the numbers?
by readingbedding » 25 Apr 2007 10:20
by Stranded » 25 Apr 2007 10:25
Alan PartridgeStrandedAlan PartridgeRoyalee Europe?! You're having a laugh - you'd have to be a grade A idiot to suggest little Reading'd get into Europe.
That's actually that ridiuclous even when we were in the 2nd division, that's a realistic aim that any club that goes the right way could achieve. Saying Reading will be bigger than Arsenal though is just
As I said though what would you rather:
A board who are targetting becoming one of the biggest clubs in the country over time or a board who are just happy to be here and make up the numbers?
There's nothing worng with ambition and havign high hopes for this club. A better and more realistic aim would be to say we want to be regularly competitive at the top end of this division, we want to have a consisitent fanbase for home matches of 30,000 for whoever we're playing. We want to be regarded as a big and attractive club in the future, things like that would still be good to hear and would still be ambitious. But come on Reading bigger than arsenal is ludicrous. It certainly won't happen in any of our lifetimes, Arsenal is a WORLDWIDE brand if you like and it's taken them 60 odd years of success to achieve that.
Reading could be a very decent 'big' Premiership club with the right investment and success on the pitch, but we won't ever be as big as Arsenal, Liverpoool, United etc.
by Bowman's Quiver » 25 Apr 2007 10:29
Alan PartridgeWoodcote RoyalAlan Partridge But i've already said my piece in a word
Howe is seriously deLOLuded if he thinks we can be bigger than Arsenal. Arsenal have more fans in Reading than there are Reading fans.
We'll never be as 'big' as them, there is only 2 clubs in England 'bigger' than them and probably only ever will be 2.
With a set of blinkers this big forget football and try horse racing.
anyone thinking Reading can be as big as Arsenal is a grade A idiot.
It's taken Arsenal years and years and years to build up their trophy collection, their WORLDWIDE fanbase, thier 60,000 stadium which they fill every week.
Whereas Reading can just about fill a 24,000 ground, have ZERO chance of seling out a 38,000 ground EVERY week and have won pricelessly nothing compared to Arsenal.
The only way we can compete with a club like that is if Madejski sold us to an 'abramovich' type, but just like Chelsea still wouldn't have the same appeal or 'size' (if you like) of Arsenal.
But feel free to believe these little pipedreams. BTW Santa isn't real either.
Why stop at Arsenal? We can be bigger than Real Madrid.
by readingboy » 25 Apr 2007 10:52
by Bucks Dave » 25 Apr 2007 11:34
by Winchester Royal » 25 Apr 2007 11:35
Users browsing this forum: Zammo and 75 guests