by Hoop Blah » 09 May 2011 16:03
by Red » 09 May 2011 16:14
by Hoop Blah » 09 May 2011 16:17
Red It's a shame I agree, and sorry to be so coarse, but ultimately they just couldn't give a flying pfuck.
by Schards#2 » 09 May 2011 16:21
Hoop BlahRed It's a shame I agree, and sorry to be so coarse, but ultimately they just couldn't give a flying pfuck.
Which kind of leads to the original point of the thread doesn't it? Why bother having the system if it's not going to be used (and I know it is being used, and well IMO, for the away tickets).
If the club don't give a fcuk about the fans (which I think this example does support) then I do think it's something worth pointing out.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 09 May 2011 16:24
Red Ultimately the club are in the business (yes, it's a business) of selling tickets - not making sure friends can sit next to each other.
It's a shame I agree, and sorry to be so coarse, but ultimately they just couldn't give a flying pfuck.
by PieEater » 09 May 2011 16:26
Schards#2 Im afraid you are banging your head against the wall complaining about anything to do with the club on here. No matter in how much detail you describe the reason for your disatisfaction, you will always get someone replying "I don't understand what your problem is" I presume they just switch off
by Schards#2 » 09 May 2011 16:27
Rev Algenon Stickleback HRed Ultimately the club are in the business (yes, it's a business) of selling tickets - not making sure friends can sit next to each other.
It's a shame I agree, and sorry to be so coarse, but ultimately they just couldn't give a flying pfuck.
It's actually easier this way to allow friends to sit together, unless all your friends happen to be in the same points band.
by RG30 » 09 May 2011 16:27
by Turns8 » 09 May 2011 16:28
Schards#2 This case is fairly trivial but it does demonstrate the club not thinking what's best for it's fans so they either don't really care, or just don't give enough thought to ticket distribution. Whichever, it could be better.
by PieEater » 09 May 2011 16:32
by Svlad Cjelli » 09 May 2011 16:34
Schards#2Rev Algenon Stickleback HRed Ultimately the club are in the business (yes, it's a business) of selling tickets - not making sure friends can sit next to each other.
It's a shame I agree, and sorry to be so coarse, but ultimately they just couldn't give a flying pfuck.
It's actually easier this way to allow friends to sit together, unless all your friends happen to be in the same points band.
This is actually true and I've been a beneficiary of it.
However, despite it benefiting me, it still seems unfair that 0 points earns you the same rights as, say 1500
by Schards#2 » 09 May 2011 16:37
Turns8Schards#2 This case is fairly trivial but it does demonstrate the club not thinking what's best for it's fans so they either don't really care, or just don't give enough thought to ticket distribution. Whichever, it could be better.
It's run as a business...if the club had to bow down to every individual request, moan or gripe about wanting to sit with person x otherwise it will be the end of the world then it would take longer than 4 days to sort out the tickets...the club is only interested in getting bums on seats...
and the argument by many about how if they treat 'loyal' fans so poorly then they won't come back doesn't really stack up...based on the ST renewals, so unfortunately for all those feeling hard done by, it looks like the club has got it right.
by Svlad Cjelli » 09 May 2011 16:42
by Turns8 » 09 May 2011 16:42
Schards#2Turns8Schards#2 This case is fairly trivial but it does demonstrate the club not thinking what's best for it's fans so they either don't really care, or just don't give enough thought to ticket distribution. Whichever, it could be better.
It's run as a business...if the club had to bow down to every individual request, moan or gripe about wanting to sit with person x otherwise it will be the end of the world then it would take longer than 4 days to sort out the tickets...the club is only interested in getting bums on seats...
and the argument by many about how if they treat 'loyal' fans so poorly then they won't come back doesn't really stack up...based on the ST renewals, so unfortunately for all those feeling hard done by, it looks like the club has got it right.
Well, to be honest, no.
As previously stated ad nauseum, the suggestion is that they had 24 hours of sales with a points limit and the reasons have been given.
Businesses who treat customers poorly will lose some of them, less so in the football world as you don't relly have the option of moving to another supplier, however, some will go and not come back.
The sales of season tickets this year are due entirely to the sale period coinciding with an 8 game winning streak and nothing to do with their marketing strategy or customer service.
by Schards#2 » 09 May 2011 16:49
Turns8Schards#2Turns8 It's run as a business...if the club had to bow down to every individual request, moan or gripe about wanting to sit with person x otherwise it will be the end of the world then it would take longer than 4 days to sort out the tickets...the club is only interested in getting bums on seats...
and the argument by many about how if they treat 'loyal' fans so poorly then they won't come back doesn't really stack up...based on the ST renewals, so unfortunately for all those feeling hard done by, it looks like the club has got it right.
Well, to be honest, no.
As previously stated ad nauseum, the suggestion is that they had 24 hours of sales with a points limit and the reasons have been given.
Businesses who treat customers poorly will lose some of them, less so in the football world as you don't relly have the option of moving to another supplier, however, some will go and not come back.
The sales of season tickets this year are due entirely to the sale period coinciding with an 8 game winning streak and nothing to do with their marketing strategy or customer service.
ST renewal info went out prior to the run IIRC...they didn't get halfway through the 8 game run and then issue the renewal stating that you had to renewal before the run ended...I can't believe that all fans suddenly decided to renew based on the run...
by Forbury Lion » 09 May 2011 16:59
by Hoop Blah » 09 May 2011 17:04
Turns8 ST renewal info went out prior to the run IIRC...they didn't get halfway through the 8 game run and then issue the renewal stating that you had to renewal before the run ended...I can't believe that all fans suddenly decided to renew based on the run...
by Hoop Blah » 09 May 2011 17:10
Svlad Cjelli But the game is on Friday.
Are you seriously suggesting that about 8,000 have to wait an extra day so that a couple of hundred can cherry pick the seats they want? People have to book babbysitters, make travel arrangements take time off work (if they live away) and if they can't be sure they've actually got a ticket until Tuesday that's a bit off for the majority, IMHO.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 09 May 2011 17:11
Schards#2Svlad Cjelli I find that hard to believe, considering that they did clearly think of it for away tickets, which went on sale at the same time.
I think you give the ticket office too much credit for their thought processes. I would imagine they realised that the away game might sell out, (hence the banding) but don't think the home one will so just went for season ticket holders first, then everyone else. Rather than thinking that a day of banding would help the regular non S/T's get the better seats over the less regulars.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 09 May 2011 17:22
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests