by One Beer is never enough. » 17 Jan 2008 14:41
by Huntley & Palmer » 17 Jan 2008 15:01
by shadesrwrf » 17 Jan 2008 15:23
by Barry the bird boggler » 17 Jan 2008 15:24
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Jan 2008 15:24
Huntley & Palmer So you would have had no problem if one of these sniffer dogs had alerted it's handler to pull you over in your car or deny you entry into the ground while you are searched in public?
by Schards#2 » 17 Jan 2008 15:27
Wycombe RoyalHuntley & Palmer So you would have had no problem if one of these sniffer dogs had alerted it's handler to pull you over in your car or deny you entry into the ground while you are searched in public?
I wouldn't, because I know they wouldn't find anything. But if it means they do catch poeple who are carrying drugs then my minute or so of inconvenience is worth it.
by Wycombe Royal » 17 Jan 2008 15:34
Schards#2Wycombe RoyalHuntley & Palmer So you would have had no problem if one of these sniffer dogs had alerted it's handler to pull you over in your car or deny you entry into the ground while you are searched in public?
I wouldn't, because I know they wouldn't find anything. But if it means they do catch poeple who are carrying drugs then my minute or so of inconvenience is worth it.
As Skyline said, a significant proportion of bank notes in circulation have traces of cocaine on them.
by shadesrwrf » 17 Jan 2008 15:40
Wycombe Royal They don't end up searching endless hordes of people at airports who will also be carrying bank notes do they?
by One Beer is never enough. » 17 Jan 2008 15:45
Huntley & Palmer So you would have had no problem if one of these sniffer dogs had alerted it's handler to pull you over in your car or deny you entry into the ground while you are searched in public?
by hilaryscott » 17 Jan 2008 15:55
by shadesrwrf » 17 Jan 2008 15:57
hilaryscott Just to let you know - it was us at EP who broke the story and went to Jon at STAR for a comment. It was press released but no one else picked up on it.
by One Beer is never enough. » 17 Jan 2008 16:02
hilaryscott Just to let you know - it was us at EP who broke the story and went to Jon at STAR for a comment. It was press released but no one else picked up on it.
by Silver Fox » 17 Jan 2008 16:03
Huntley & Palmer So you would have had no problem if one of these sniffer dogs had alerted it's handler to pull you over in your car or deny you entry into the ground while you are searched in public?
by URZZZZZZZZ » 17 Jan 2008 16:53
by RoyalBlue » 17 Jan 2008 18:08
hilaryscott Just to let you know - it was us at EP who broke the story and went to Jon at STAR for a comment. It was press released but no one else picked up on it.
shadesrwrfhilaryscott Just to let you know - it was us at EP who broke the story and went to Jon at STAR for a comment. It was press released but no one else picked up on it.
That figures. I do hope the EP won't be running any stories complaining about Reading's drug problem for a while.
Blue and White Toucan
Maybe the company has certain Directors that we are not aware of with a link to RFC.
by shadesrwrf » 17 Jan 2008 18:25
by rg6royal » 17 Jan 2008 18:45
by Armadillo Roadkill » 17 Jan 2008 20:03
by Blue and White Toucan » 17 Jan 2008 20:51
Extasy: not noted for cuasing aggression
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 166 guests