by Sun Tzu »
23 Jul 2010 14:39
floyd__streete Typically short-sighted approach from the club, if it doesn't make money there isn't any point to it. I'd wager this might put off some of the more casual fans from the outlying areas, remember you aren't just losing their ticket money, you are losing the money they pay for the rankerous refreshments on offer, the cash they spaff on a brand new hideous-looking replica shirt every year etc. Those of you who typically repeat the club line of 'there are trains and buses available' neglect to mention the obvious cost implication during these financially sensitive times of paying for a train and then a bus. To be honest, if gates continue to dip then the club will thoroughly deserve to lose out on support given their financially-driven short-term thinking.
What's the logic in a tiny number of people getting a subsidy from the club ?
Can I ask for some cash towards my petrol as if I had to take a bus into town and then another one out it would cost me more...
It would be great if the club could subsidise transport for everyone, but what is it about the small numbers using certain bus routes that make them more deserving of subsidy than anyone else ?
Do the people who travel every week from far flung parts of the country deserve a subsidy too ? What about the fans who fly in for games from the US, Australia and Europe ?
It's a tough call really, obviously anyone who has enjoyed the buses and found them convenient will feel that by not running them they are missing out - but what should the priority be if money is tight ? I'd agree by the way, that a huge part of the problem is the continuing stupid level of wages. But that's not a problem we're going to solve unilaterally....