by bb0118 » 04 Jul 2007 14:34
by G'La » 04 Jul 2007 15:06
bb0118 For those wishing to see the video and dont wish to pay £1.99 could always contact:
These are the peeps behind the expansion. Ask for Richard Taylor too.
by Coppelled Streets » 03 Oct 2007 18:42
by Dirk Gently » 03 Oct 2007 18:46
Coppelled Streets Anyone close enough to the club able to tell us if the east stand expansion is likely to go ahead even if we're relegated this season?
It would still make perfect sense to go ahead with it for when we went back up (it would happen, one day at least) and of course for the bigger games when we can get 24,000 in the Championship, we can offer those empty seats to schools etc and attract yet more bums on seats.
Maybe Behindu or Dirk Gently can help shed some light on the plans, or STAR?
by Behindu » 03 Oct 2007 19:09
by shadesrwrf » 03 Oct 2007 21:59
by Bill Oddie » 04 Oct 2007 00:45
by Coppelled Streets » 04 Oct 2007 01:38
Daniella We hadn't peaked then had we? We have now and the only way is backwards.
by working class hero » 04 Oct 2007 10:32
Coppelled StreetsDaniella We hadn't peaked then had we? We have now and the only way is backwards.
That's your opinion and not a fact!
If we do receive some investment as is John Madejski's current plan, that would make us far more competitive and the target then would be european football.
Never say never!
by Dirk Gently » 04 Oct 2007 10:36
working class heroCoppelled StreetsDaniella We hadn't peaked then had we? We have now and the only way is backwards.
That's your opinion and not a fact!
If we do receive some investment as is John Madejski's current plan, that would make us far more competitive and the target then would be european football.
Never say never!
Unless we start paying OTT wages we will not attract top players. If we do opt to break the wage structure then prices will have to rise - and there is no proof that investment will work [Leeds / Bradford / Barnsley etc]. If prices rise then more fans will be forced out. We are already pondering on giving up out STs next year - not because of relegation worries, more on cost grounds.
I suspect many others will also bite the bullet if prices rise.
And so we see the dilemma. Raise wages and prices and lose the fans who paid when in the wilderness - and there is no real rush for STs atm....
Do not invest and sink and lose the glory hunters.....
European football. You are having a
by Wax Jacket » 04 Oct 2007 11:22
by Dirk Gently » 04 Oct 2007 11:26
Wax Jacket but football doesn't operate in the usual sphere of economic/business rules and laws.
they will charge more
by Schards#2 » 04 Oct 2007 11:31
Dirk GentlyWax Jacket but football doesn't operate in the usual sphere of economic/business rules and laws.
they will charge more
If they do it'll be financial suicide, and they'll get deafened by the criticism from all quarters.
by Dirk Gently » 04 Oct 2007 11:35
Schards#2Dirk GentlyWax Jacket but football doesn't operate in the usual sphere of economic/business rules and laws.
they will charge more
If they do it'll be financial suicide, and they'll get deafened by the criticism from all quarters.
Maybe not all quarters, I suspect there will be still be one or two apologists.
by Katie Marsden » 04 Oct 2007 11:53
by Dirk Gently » 04 Oct 2007 11:57
Katie Marsden This decision will define the club for the next 20 years.
If the club has any ambitions of becoming an established Premiership club it needs to go ahead with this. I see even Fulham are extending their ground to 30,000.
I think if we showed some more ambition in the transfer market we'd fill a 30,000 stadium more often than not. Who cares if tickets go on general sale, it matters not. All that matters is if the ground is 90% full on average for the whole season. Only very few clubs sell out every home game.
If the club don't go ahead with the extension it will send out a message that it has no ambition at all.
by Wycombe Royal » 04 Oct 2007 12:34
Dirk GentlyKatie Marsden This decision will define the club for the next 20 years.
If the club has any ambitions of becoming an established Premiership club it needs to go ahead with this. I see even Fulham are extending their ground to 30,000.
I think if we showed some more ambition in the transfer market we'd fill a 30,000 stadium more often than not. Who cares if tickets go on general sale, it matters not. All that matters is if the ground is 90% full on average for the whole season. Only very few clubs sell out every home game.
If the club don't go ahead with the extension it will send out a message that it has no ambition at all.
Nail.
On.
Head.
by handbags_harris » 04 Oct 2007 12:40
Daniella We hadn't peaked then had we? We have now and the only way is backwards.
by working class hero » 04 Oct 2007 15:14
Dirk Gentlyworking class heroCoppelled StreetsDaniella We hadn't peaked then had we? We have now and the only way is backwards.
That's your opinion and not a fact!
If we do receive some investment as is John Madejski's current plan, that would make us far more competitive and the target then would be european football.
Never say never!
Unless we start paying OTT wages we will not attract top players. If we do opt to break the wage structure then prices will have to rise - and there is no proof that investment will work [Leeds / Bradford / Barnsley etc]. If prices rise then more fans will be forced out. We are already pondering on giving up out STs next year - not because of relegation worries, more on cost grounds.
I suspect many others will also bite the bullet if prices rise.
And so we see the dilemma. Raise wages and prices and lose the fans who paid when in the wilderness - and there is no real rush for STs atm....
Do not invest and sink and lose the glory hunters.....
European football. You are having a
But with an expansion prices wouldn't have to rise because the extra capacity would allow the overall income to rise in fact, there's no way anyone could defend the club if prices did rise after such an expansion.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 34 guests