by Pat Butchers Ring » 23 Feb 2012 17:23
by Friday's Legacy » 23 Feb 2012 17:52
by 1871 Royal » 23 Feb 2012 19:53
Friday's Legacy i would though like to see a stand named after him,.
by handbags_harris » 23 Feb 2012 22:00
by Tails » 23 Feb 2012 22:08
by Wimb » 24 Feb 2012 03:27
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 24 Feb 2012 06:34
Wimb Easy way to make money and I'd rather have a new player then worry about what the stadium's name is.Chances are people will always end up calling the 'The Madejski' or 'The Mad Stad' anyway so not fussed.
Madejski will be remembered as long as this club exists anyway, if the name does change he could always have a suite or a road around the stadium named after him... even maybe a stand.. I suggest the West Upper
by Terminal Boardom » 24 Feb 2012 10:08
by Cobi » 24 Feb 2012 10:11
by Terminal Boardom » 24 Feb 2012 10:45
by royalp-we » 24 Feb 2012 11:07
Terminal Boardom Egos aside, when the new ground was named Madejski Stadium, it joined a very select number of grounds that were named after an individual. There was Fellowes Park (before Walsall moved to the Bescot and well before the Mad Stad was built), Ninian Park (named after a local dignatory) and more recently the Kassam in Oxford. I think that keeping the name as the Mad Stad would make a refreshing change from the spread of corporate capitalist greed.
The vast majority of the grounds in this country took their names from a road or are of the town or city obviously before money was king. Very little originality in that. Brentford's ground took their name from the local brewery - the Griffin being the emblem of Fuller, Smith & Turner I believe.
Do we really want to end up like America? Look at the names of their stadia. It makes me shudder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sports_venues_with_sole_naming_rights
Whataburger Field anyone?
by Cobi » 24 Feb 2012 12:46
Terminal Boardom I would not be surprised if there was a distinctive age split between those that don't care what the name is and those that are of a more traditional persuasion. I fall quite clearly into the latter group.
by postwhisperer » 24 Feb 2012 15:03
royalp-weTerminal Boardom Egos aside, when the new ground was named Madejski Stadium, it joined a very select number of grounds that were named after an individual. There was Fellowes Park (before Walsall moved to the Bescot and well before the Mad Stad was built), Ninian Park (named after a local dignatory) and more recently the Kassam in Oxford. I think that keeping the name as the Mad Stad would make a refreshing change from the spread of corporate capitalist greed.
The vast majority of the grounds in this country took their names from a road or are of the town or city obviously before money was king. Very little originality in that. Brentford's ground took their name from the local brewery - the Griffin being the emblem of Fuller, Smith & Turner I believe.
Do we really want to end up like America? Look at the names of their stadia. It makes me shudder http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_sports_venues_with_sole_naming_rights
Whataburger Field anyone?
Pizza Hut Park
by Magnus » 24 Feb 2012 15:15
by Pat Butchers Ring » 24 Feb 2012 16:00
by postwhisperer » 24 Feb 2012 16:06
by Friday's Legacy » 24 Feb 2012 17:34
Terminal Boardom I would not be surprised if there was a distinctive age split between those that don't care what the name is and those that are of a more traditional persuasion. I fall quite clearly into the latter group.
Pat Butchers Ring For me the single most thing I would want to change about our club is the fact we we don't seem to value our identity. Perhaps the poll should have been what is unique about Reading. We don't value our hoops, nickname, ground or even as fans we don't have anything that is unique to us. Everything about us is pretty generic.
by paultheroyal » 25 Feb 2012 08:02
by Gordons Cumming » 25 Feb 2012 08:47
by Ian Royal » 25 Feb 2012 10:10
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests