by Harpers So Solid Crew » 21 Feb 2016 06:32
by harry » 21 Feb 2016 10:28
Harpers So Solid Crew So Sunderland have announced cheapest ST for next season of 370 pounds.
Is it time that RFC were a bit more adventurous in the price of STs ?
Mostly thinking adult tickets.
Perhaps decrease in North, to say 300, or lower blocks cheaper, once again it is noticeable that the front seats are pretty empty when choice of the whole stand is same price.
So perhaps centre blocks in the east 300, up to the concourse entrance.
by Ian Royal » 21 Feb 2016 14:30
by Winchester Royal » 21 Feb 2016 17:13
Ian Royal I can't see price being a big enough issue in our attendances to be worth changing. It seems very unlikely it would attract a lot more fans, you'd have to be talking a hell of a discount to encourage enough people, and then you've got too big a gap to make up in income for it to be worth it.
I'd not be happy about someone paying 20% less than me to be closer to the pitch and have no / partial cover either. I'd be really oxf*rd off if I sat one row above the cut off point where there's zero discernible difference in seat too.
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 21 Feb 2016 18:49
by tidus_mi2 » 21 Feb 2016 19:36
by Pandoras Box » 21 Feb 2016 19:45
by Harpers So Solid Crew » 21 Feb 2016 19:51
Pandoras Box Personally, I'd rather keep them high, so that those who really want to come would be willing to carry on paying. In the upper west we must get most of the away dayers purely for the bigger games. For WBA I didn't recognise one person within the three rows around me. No one had any idea who the players were and sat and stared like being at the cinema plus loads of kids who couldn't sit still after 5 minutes. Simply so they can go back to work and tell every one they were there, but we'll probably never see them again. Cheaper STs will simply attract more of those types who will leave the seat empty for most of the season or lend it to more of their mates for a day out - they will not be RFC supporters.
by AthleticoSpizz » 21 Feb 2016 20:44
by paultheroyal » 21 Feb 2016 21:04
by Ian Royal » 21 Feb 2016 21:23
Winchester RoyalIan Royal I can't see price being a big enough issue in our attendances to be worth changing. It seems very unlikely it would attract a lot more fans, you'd have to be talking a hell of a discount to encourage enough people, and then you've got too big a gap to make up in income for it to be worth it.
I'd not be happy about someone paying 20% less than me to be closer to the pitch and have no / partial cover either. I'd be really oxf*rd off if I sat one row above the cut off point where there's zero discernible difference in seat too.
Surely you'd just renew in a row further forward to get the saving?
by LWJ » 22 Feb 2016 09:06
by CrowthorneRoyal » 22 Feb 2016 12:00
paultheroyal Freeze prizes and keep the under 7s free which is an amazing deal and I would be very happy!
by RG30 » 22 Feb 2016 12:06
by Maneki Neko » 22 Feb 2016 12:12
Ian Royal I can't see price being a big enough issue in our attendances to be worth changing. It seems very unlikely it would attract a lot more fans, you'd have to be talking a hell of a discount to encourage enough people, and then you've got too big a gap to make up in income for it to be worth it.
.
by Coppelled_Streets » 22 Feb 2016 12:20
by Winchester Royal » 22 Feb 2016 14:21
by paultheroyal » 22 Feb 2016 17:50
CrowthorneRoyalpaultheroyal Freeze prizes and keep the under 7s free which is an amazing deal and I would be very happy!
This ^^^^ + put the age up to Under 8's as my eldest wont get a free ST next season under the current scheme. All three of us have been to every single home game plus the cup games and even a few away games. So I think the plan to get more people going to games has worked. Yes there are probably a few empty seats during the midweek games that belong to an U7 but not as many as I thought there would be
by Maneki Neko » 23 Feb 2016 10:19
CrowthorneRoyalpaultheroyal Freeze prizes and keep the under 7s free which is an amazing deal and I would be very happy!
This ^^^^ + put the age up to Under 8's as my eldest wont get a free ST next season under the current scheme. All three of us have been to every single home game plus the cup games and even a few away games. So I think the plan to get more people going to games has worked. Yes there are probably a few empty seats during the midweek games that belong to an U7 but not as many as I thought there would be
by tee peg » 23 Feb 2016 11:11
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 60 guests