by Dirk Gently » 10 Jan 2008 10:50
by Huntley & Palmer » 10 Jan 2008 11:45
by T.R.O.L.I. » 10 Jan 2008 12:15
Huntley & Palmer If I am brutally honest I don't think it would be worthwhile from my perspective, don't think I would go there. I enjoy sitting down with the odd moment of standing and gesticulating thrown in.
by Hugo Boss » 10 Jan 2008 13:02
by Vision » 10 Jan 2008 13:03
Hugo Boss I would love to have terracing back at football so generally would be in favour of standing areas.
It's the "safe" bit of the terminology that concerns me though. I have visions of some soft material to stop any injuries should someone fall obviously. It will also be covered in squared grids with spaces allocated similarly to seats.
by T.R.O.L.I. » 10 Jan 2008 13:05
VisionHugo Boss I would love to have terracing back at football so generally would be in favour of standing areas.
It's the "safe" bit of the terminology that concerns me though. I have visions of some soft material to stop any injuries should someone fall obviously. It will also be covered in squared grids with spaces allocated similarly to seats.
No it would be a giant bouncy castle.
by Row Z Royal » 10 Jan 2008 13:07
T.R.O.L.I.VisionHugo Boss I would love to have terracing back at football so generally would be in favour of standing areas.
It's the "safe" bit of the terminology that concerns me though. I have visions of some soft material to stop any injuries should someone fall obviously. It will also be covered in squared grids with spaces allocated similarly to seats.
No it would be a giant bouncy castle.
At least you could then have a giant bundle when your team score.
by Deadlock » 10 Jan 2008 14:32
by Silver Fox » 10 Jan 2008 15:30
by Coppelled Streets » 10 Jan 2008 16:52
by working class hero » 10 Jan 2008 18:47
by chilipepper91 » 10 Jan 2008 19:37
by T.R.O.L.I. » 11 Jan 2008 07:16
by working class hero » 11 Jan 2008 12:30
T.R.O.L.I. I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
by Skyline » 11 Jan 2008 12:35
T.R.O.L.I. I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
by Dirk Gently » 11 Jan 2008 12:38
SkylineT.R.O.L.I. I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
Well I know for sure of at least one person who voted in favour of standing areas being re-introduced, yet much prefers to sit down at football.
by Baines » 11 Jan 2008 12:42
Dirk GentlySkylineT.R.O.L.I. I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
Well I know for sure of at least one person who voted in favour of standing areas being re-introduced, yet much prefers to sit down at football.
And that includes me. I'm old enough now to prefer to stand, but just because you won't use a facility yourself doesn't mean that you can't see why it's needed or the benefit that it will bring to everyone - not just those who will use it.
This poll is specifically and deliberately NOT asking "do you want to stand up at matches?"
by Silver Fox » 11 Jan 2008 13:16
T.R.O.L.I. I see the current poll stands at 89% in favour - no doubt pauLOLtheroyaLOL will soon teel us that 89% does not mean most people surveyed would prefer to stand at football...
by rabidbee » 11 Jan 2008 13:39
Users browsing this forum: Orion1871 and 45 guests