by Brum Royal » 31 May 2016 14:35
by Whore Jackie » 31 May 2016 14:36
by genome » 31 May 2016 14:38
genome Fitness concerns over Henderson and Wilshere so he drops Drinkwater and takes 5 strikers, lol
by TBM » 31 May 2016 15:07
Whore Jackie Always thought Drinkwater and Delph would miss out, but I'm surprised he's gone with Sturridge/Rashford over Townsend. That is a very narrow-looking squad. Barkley's massively lucky that Roy likes a squad packed with centre-midfielders.
by YateleyRoyal » 31 May 2016 15:09
Whore Jackie Always thought Drinkwater and Delph would miss out, but I'm surprised he's gone with Sturridge/Rashford over Townsend. That is a very narrow-looking squad. Barkley's massively lucky that Roy likes a squad packed with centre-midfielders.
by genome » 31 May 2016 15:13
by Vision » 31 May 2016 15:15
YateleyRoyalWhore Jackie Always thought Drinkwater and Delph would miss out, but I'm surprised he's gone with Sturridge/Rashford over Townsend. That is a very narrow-looking squad. Barkley's massively lucky that Roy likes a squad packed with centre-midfielders.
Only real 'width' there is an out of form Sterling and a bang average Lallana. Great.
by Victor Meldrew » 31 May 2016 17:17
VisionYateleyRoyalWhore Jackie Always thought Drinkwater and Delph would miss out, but I'm surprised he's gone with Sturridge/Rashford over Townsend. That is a very narrow-looking squad. Barkley's massively lucky that Roy likes a squad packed with centre-midfielders.
Only real 'width' there is an out of form Sterling and a bang average Lallana. Great.
As with most sides at the moment, the width is provided by attacking full backs.
I'd like to have seen Townsend go (and Drinkwater for that matter) but there's little point in taking a supposed winger if both of the two systems Hodgson intends to use do not utilise them.
by TBM » 31 May 2016 17:19
Victor Meldrew So why include Townsend in the 26?
by Hoop Blah » 31 May 2016 17:27
by Ian Royal » 31 May 2016 19:02
genome Harsh on Drinkwater, making 35 starts for a title-winning side isn't enough?
by Royal Rother » 31 May 2016 19:37
by Tails » 31 May 2016 19:52
by Kitsondinho » 31 May 2016 19:58
No Fixed Abodegenome Fitness concerns over Henderson and Wilshere so he drops Drinkwater and takes 5 strikers, lol
Yep. But Woy has his favourites. No surprise with the inclusion of Henderson and Wilshire even though on recent form Drinkwater and Noble should be in ahead of them.
I would like to have seen Carrick in there personally. His ball retention is better than any midfielder we have in the squad.
by Ascotexgunner » 31 May 2016 20:31
by Ian Royal » 31 May 2016 20:47
Royal Rother But ol' Glass Legs is the closest to world class we have in England at the moment and appears to be fit and improving with every game so a fair enough mini-gamble.
Wilshere I'm thinking there but he's Glass Ankles so maybe you mean Sturridge... In which case I agree 100%.
Very surprised he's gone.
by TBM » 31 May 2016 20:57
Tails Drinkwater has been part of something great but looked very average in the friendlies - sometimes good club players don't make the step up. He had his chance and he didn't take it with both hands.
A few in that squad that should count themselves a touch fortuitous (Barkley, Wilshere) but on the whole, not overly critical of the choices. My only concern is the CBs and that is far from a selection related issue.
It is a young squad and although Barkley and Wilshere (to name but two) aren't on fire, the majority of the squad have potentially another 3 major tournaments together.
by genome » 31 May 2016 23:01
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 130 guests