by From Despair To Where? » 21 Jun 2024 16:04
by WestYorksRoyal » 21 Jun 2024 21:19
by Jinx » 21 Jun 2024 21:32
by genome » 21 Jun 2024 21:32
by Sutekh » 21 Jun 2024 21:34
Jinx The first time the English refs are in charge, you get a controversial 3 minute VAR decision
by Orion1871 » 21 Jun 2024 21:34
Jinx The first time the English refs are in charge, you get a controversial 3 minute VAR decision
by Jinx » 21 Jun 2024 21:35
by genome » 21 Jun 2024 21:37
by Jinx » 21 Jun 2024 21:39
by NathStPaul » 21 Jun 2024 21:48
by tulip » 21 Jun 2024 22:08
by tulip » 21 Jun 2024 22:09
Jinx Although the French keeper went "merde, I can't reach that, oh look there's a Dutchy there, I better appeal"
by Uke » 21 Jun 2024 22:13
by Royal Rother » 22 Jun 2024 07:34
by bcubed » 22 Jun 2024 10:02
Royal Rother Kevin Garside sums it up very well.
And when Southgate intervened his first change was Conor Gallagher, a kind of fast-twitch replica of Rice, a player who runs about a lot but who cannot control a match at this level. So England had two of a kind when the situation was crying out for Kobbie Mainoo or Adam Wharton to put their foot on the ball and look up.
Their absence, plus that of Cole Palmer, was inexplicable in the context of the aimless, guileless plod. The reaction of the players suggested the experience felt as awful as it looked. None had an answer, just vague platitudes about a desire to get better.
Southgate has transformed the England experience in important ways, returned the national team to the centre of things again for the players and the fans.
In three prior tournaments he teased us with the delicious idea that England might just be good enough to win. But in the end we never quite escaped the suspicion that the one thing holding the team back was him.
The players and the FA love him. Of course they do. He is a thoroughly decent man and cares deeply about his flock, but no longer knows how to help them.
The England proposition is in a vastly better place than it was eight years ago when he swept up after Sam Allardyce. For all his leadership qualities, his understanding of group dynamics and sympathetic approach, his management skills have little application on match day when players need energy, direction, a plan and a sense of mission, all of which have been manifestly absent.
The best for which we can hope against Slovenia and beyond, is that the players take ownership of the problem and work it out for themselves.
Freed from Southgate’s suffocating yoke, England might yet do themselves justice, and by extension make the experience something to enjoy not endure, for us as well as them.
by Snowflake Royal » 22 Jun 2024 10:29
bcubedRoyal Rother Kevin Garside sums it up very well.
And when Southgate intervened his first change was Conor Gallagher, a kind of fast-twitch replica of Rice, a player who runs about a lot but who cannot control a match at this level. So England had two of a kind when the situation was crying out for Kobbie Mainoo or Adam Wharton to put their foot on the ball and look up.
Their absence, plus that of Cole Palmer, was inexplicable in the context of the aimless, guileless plod. The reaction of the players suggested the experience felt as awful as it looked. None had an answer, just vague platitudes about a desire to get better.
Southgate has transformed the England experience in important ways, returned the national team to the centre of things again for the players and the fans.
In three prior tournaments he teased us with the delicious idea that England might just be good enough to win. But in the end we never quite escaped the suspicion that the one thing holding the team back was him.
The players and the FA love him. Of course they do. He is a thoroughly decent man and cares deeply about his flock, but no longer knows how to help them.
The England proposition is in a vastly better place than it was eight years ago when he swept up after Sam Allardyce. For all his leadership qualities, his understanding of group dynamics and sympathetic approach, his management skills have little application on match day when players need energy, direction, a plan and a sense of mission, all of which have been manifestly absent.
The best for which we can hope against Slovenia and beyond, is that the players take ownership of the problem and work it out for themselves.
Freed from Southgate’s suffocating yoke, England might yet do themselves justice, and by extension make the experience something to enjoy not endure, for us as well as them.
Cue the Southgate defenders to say, he's got us into the top 4 in the world and we've reached Euros and World finals with ease, etc. But really when you've got such great players and the stats tell you that they are, how else do you explain such a dire performance. The manager has to take the blame for his selection, tactics and lack of match day nous.
by Jinx » 22 Jun 2024 11:22
Snowflake RoyalbcubedRoyal Rother Kevin Garside sums it up very well.
And when Southgate intervened his first change was Conor Gallagher, a kind of fast-twitch replica of Rice, a player who runs about a lot but who cannot control a match at this level. So England had two of a kind when the situation was crying out for Kobbie Mainoo or Adam Wharton to put their foot on the ball and look up.
Their absence, plus that of Cole Palmer, was inexplicable in the context of the aimless, guileless plod. The reaction of the players suggested the experience felt as awful as it looked. None had an answer, just vague platitudes about a desire to get better.
Southgate has transformed the England experience in important ways, returned the national team to the centre of things again for the players and the fans.
In three prior tournaments he teased us with the delicious idea that England might just be good enough to win. But in the end we never quite escaped the suspicion that the one thing holding the team back was him.
The players and the FA love him. Of course they do. He is a thoroughly decent man and cares deeply about his flock, but no longer knows how to help them.
The England proposition is in a vastly better place than it was eight years ago when he swept up after Sam Allardyce. For all his leadership qualities, his understanding of group dynamics and sympathetic approach, his management skills have little application on match day when players need energy, direction, a plan and a sense of mission, all of which have been manifestly absent.
The best for which we can hope against Slovenia and beyond, is that the players take ownership of the problem and work it out for themselves.
Freed from Southgate’s suffocating yoke, England might yet do themselves justice, and by extension make the experience something to enjoy not endure, for us as well as them.
Cue the Southgate defenders to say, he's got us into the top 4 in the world and we've reached Euros and World finals with ease, etc. But really when you've got such great players and the stats tell you that they are, how else do you explain such a dire performance. The manager has to take the blame for his selection, tactics and lack of match day nous.
Its the players who play the game. I don’t care how bad the coaching, tactics and prep are, if you have the quality those players do you should play better.
Southgate's management has nothing to do with them making basic passing errors under no pressure.
Southgate has a solid record of performance, more than quite a few of these players at this level, you can't just absolve them of all responsibility and blame him.
No manager tells his players to go out and play at walking pace, with poor closing down, slow passing and no intent to score. So why are they doing it?
What Soughtgate is asking for is the tedious possession based domination of the first 30 minutes of the Serbia game. And the players did nothing like it against Denmark.
They've believed their own hype, vastly under appreciated their opposition, and aren't performing. That's on them as much as Southgate
by NathStPaul » 22 Jun 2024 13:09
by Uke » 22 Jun 2024 13:57
by Winston Biscuit » 22 Jun 2024 14:08
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests