by Sanguine » 13 Nov 2014 08:37
by Hendo » 13 Nov 2014 08:50
by Sutekh » 13 Nov 2014 11:15
by Once were Biscuitmen » 13 Nov 2014 12:40
by ZacNaloen » 13 Nov 2014 12:47
by floyd__streete » 13 Nov 2014 12:50
by Hendo » 13 Nov 2014 12:58
by MouldyRoyal » 13 Nov 2014 13:02
by PieEater » 13 Nov 2014 13:03
by Sanguine » 13 Nov 2014 13:09
by ZacNaloen » 13 Nov 2014 13:19
PieEater The FA were meant to have influenced the dodgy Jack Warner, and yet IIRC we only received one vote and it wasn't him.
You have to ask whether FIFA are so corrupt or out of touch that they really think they'd get away with this, what a shambles.
by Elm Park Pasty » 13 Nov 2014 13:21
by sandman » 13 Nov 2014 13:25
by MouldyRoyal » 13 Nov 2014 13:32
ZacNaloenPieEater The FA were meant to have influenced the dodgy Jack Warner, and yet IIRC we only received one vote and it wasn't him.
You have to ask whether FIFA are so corrupt or out of touch that they really think they'd get away with this, what a shambles.
They see themselves as untouchable.
by From Despair To Where? » 13 Nov 2014 13:43
PieEater The FA were meant to have influenced the dodgy Jack Warner, and yet IIRC we only received one vote and it wasn't him.
You have to ask whether FIFA are so corrupt or out of touch that they really think they'd get away with this, what a shambles.
by Sanguine » 13 Nov 2014 14:39
by Winston Smith » 13 Nov 2014 16:57
by TFF » 13 Nov 2014 16:59
Sanguine Guardian reporting that FIFA have disabled the link that detailed the members of their appeal committee, which include someone linked to Bin Hammam.
http://www.fifa.com/aboutfifa/federatio ... 82042.html
![]()
Almost Python-esque, is this.
by Kitsondinho » 13 Nov 2014 18:38
by John Madejski's Wallet » 13 Nov 2014 23:08
Winston Smith Another reminder that I am very much IN! for a Qatari world cup, preferably in the winter
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests