by blade 1 » 07 Jul 2009 17:55
by papereyes » 08 Jul 2009 09:24
blade 1 Think its pretty harsh really.
How long were davids and mutu banned for for taking proper drugs?
This time your man goes in for a pack of tunes and could get banned for 2 years.
It probably means we need to buy a new keeper and have even less chance of keeping our better players.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 08 Jul 2009 13:00
papereyes Stupidity and ignorance can never be used as a defence.
by blade 1 » 08 Jul 2009 18:44
by Deathy » 08 Jul 2009 19:28
by leww_rfc » 07 Sep 2009 23:13
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 08 Sep 2009 09:20
by Wycombe Royal » 08 Sep 2009 09:35
The Real Sandhurst Royal How could a drug enhance a goalkeepers performance especialy when it is Paddy Kenny.
A bit harsh on a player that has always taken a bit of stick from the RFC fans.
by (.)Boobies(.) » 08 Sep 2009 12:26
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 08 Sep 2009 13:09
(.)Boobies(.) The FA have accepted the drug wasn't to enhance performance, so this 9 month ban seems very unfair indeed.
by Wycombe Royal » 08 Sep 2009 13:15
(.)Boobies(.) The FA have accepted the drug wasn't to enhance performance, so this 9 month ban seems very unfair indeed.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 08 Sep 2009 13:17
Wycombe Royal(.)Boobies(.) The FA have accepted the drug wasn't to enhance performance, so this 9 month ban seems very unfair indeed.
He took a banned substance through his own stupidity, and punishments like this need to be handed out so as to try and prevent others being stupid..
by Silver Fox » 08 Sep 2009 13:53
by Wycombe Royal » 08 Sep 2009 13:53
Rev Algenon Stickleback HWycombe Royal(.)Boobies(.) The FA have accepted the drug wasn't to enhance performance, so this 9 month ban seems very unfair indeed.
He took a banned substance through his own stupidity, and punishments like this need to be handed out so as to try and prevent others being stupid..
Why exactly is there a need to stop sportsmen accidentally taking tiny quantities of drugs that'll make no difference whatsoever?
by ZacNaloen » 08 Sep 2009 14:23
by Hoop Blah » 08 Sep 2009 14:45
ZacNaloen With todays medical technology it's possible to determine just how much someone has had, for how long etc.
You aren't going to get an illicit high of any sort with the quantities detectable following use in medication. Simple as.
If you detect trace amounts, check their story, do more advanced tests to determine the amount taken (which would corroborate any story) and then if not guilty charge a fine to the value of the cost of the tests and tell them not be so stupid, if guilty of abuse roll out the heavy punishments.
by Wycombe Royal » 08 Sep 2009 14:58
ZacNaloen With todays medical technology it's possible to determine just how much someone has had, for how long etc.
You aren't going to get an illicit high of any sort with the quantities detectable following use in medication. Simple as.
If you detect trace amounts, check their story, do more advanced tests to determine the amount taken (which would corroborate any story) and then if not guilty charge a fine to the value of the cost of the tests and tell them not be so stupid, if guilty of abuse roll out the heavy punishments.
by krisholland » 08 Sep 2009 18:01
Hoop BlahZacNaloen With todays medical technology it's possible to determine just how much someone has had, for how long etc.
You aren't going to get an illicit high of any sort with the quantities detectable following use in medication. Simple as.
If you detect trace amounts, check their story, do more advanced tests to determine the amount taken (which would corroborate any story) and then if not guilty charge a fine to the value of the cost of the tests and tell them not be so stupid, if guilty of abuse roll out the heavy punishments.
The masking agents and processes for clearing drugs from the systems are just as advanced as the testing though aren't they?
Once you start allowing certain levels you just make it a lot harder to enforce.
by blade 1 » 08 Sep 2009 20:05
by leww_rfc » 08 Sep 2009 21:33
blade 1 It is pretty harsh seeing as it could well cost him his future at united. (being out of contract at the end of the season.)
Davids got 4 months for taking a proper performance enhancing drug. Bednar got caught buying coke and got three months. So comparatively it seems unfair. But he must have known the rules and known he had to get it through the club doctor.
Users browsing this forum: bcubed and 66 guests