by Tails » 12 Jul 2010 10:24
by Baines » 12 Jul 2010 10:25
by Baines » 12 Jul 2010 10:25
Tails Nice sporting behaviour to give the spanish the ball back when they had a corner....
by CMRoyal » 12 Jul 2010 10:36
Baines In the context of the match, picking on Spanish transgressions is somewhat like complaining about Mandela's activities in Apartheid South Africa.
by Sun Tzu » 12 Jul 2010 10:43
CMRoyal Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
by CMRoyal » 12 Jul 2010 11:04
Sun TzuCMRoyal Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
Rubbish !
LOL at the idea that because they don't have lots of tall players they aren't actually very good !! Just LOL !!!!
I'd guess being European and World Champions means absolutley nothing. To have twice come through in major competitions is not worth even crediting them with being a pretty decent team ! They play good football, on the ground (why would they need a few 6' bruisers ?) and all 10 outfield players can play.
And LOL that they inly beat Holland by playing dirty !!
Just LOL generally really.....
by TFF » 12 Jul 2010 11:10
CMRoyalSun TzuCMRoyal Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
You've completely misquoted me. Ah well.
Fact is, this Spain team is no better than past Spanish teams that have got to the Q-Fs of major tournaments. They lack the pace and height to be a truly great team, but are fortunate to be around during an unprecedentedly mediocre period for the major national teams. They are the best around at the moment, but that's not saying much and they did have to resort to some dirty play themselves last night because they are simply not good enough to overcome an average Dutch team by footballing skill alone.
by Sun Tzu » 12 Jul 2010 11:14
CMRoyal
You've completely misquoted me. Ah well.
by CMRoyal » 12 Jul 2010 11:15
by CMRoyal » 12 Jul 2010 11:18
Sun TzuCMRoyal
You've completely misquoted me. Ah well.
No I didn't.
You said lack of height meant they weren't a great team.
You said they couldn;t beat Holland using skill and did so by playing dirty.
'Misquoting' doesn't mean disagreeing with you....
by Sun Tzu » 12 Jul 2010 11:21
CMRoyal Not that quote - the bits like:-
"because they don't have lots of tall players they aren't actually very good !!".
I never said that.
"I'd guess being European and World Champions means absolutley nothing. "
I never said that.
"And LOL that they inly beat Holland by playing dirty !!"
I never said that either.
I guess it's setting up straw men rather than misquoting.
by Sun Tzu » 12 Jul 2010 11:22
CMRoyal
I said that lack of height was a factor. If they were quicker the lack of height would not matter so much.
by papereyes » 12 Jul 2010 11:31
I guess it's setting up straw men rather than misquoting.
by CMRoyal » 12 Jul 2010 11:48
Sun Tzu If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
by bigmike » 12 Jul 2010 11:55
CMRoyalSun Tzu If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
I didn't say that though, did I? I said "they lack the pace and height to be a truly great team". In other words, because they are not particularly pacy (especially when Torres isn't playing) they can't very often get in behind defences on the end of killer passes or to get decent crosses in. And when they do manage to do the latter, a bit of height would mix things up and add a major asset to their game. Not all great teams need height, but if they play very narrowly and don't have any real speed-merchants up front or running from midfield, they do need something extra. I don't think Spain have it, and would have been knocked out in most earlier World Cup competitions. So, it's the lack of pace AND the lack of height that makes them, ahem, fall short of being a truly great team.
by Ian Royal » 12 Jul 2010 13:25
John Madejski's Wallet Leaving aside the despicable Dutch fouling........
Example 1 - Robben runs through on goal, Puyol attempts a rugby tackle and (for once in his life) Robben stays on his feet but loses the ball. Had he gone down Puyol would have been off for a 2nd yellow and Spain would have been playing a considerable time with 10 men
Example 2 - Iniesta runs through and goes down after the slightest pull back from Dutch defender, who goes for a 2nd yellow
For some reason this is the thing that is sticking with me this game, and its really annoying me.
We moan about people going down too easy, yet it is clear that you bloody well have to or you don't get the decision
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 12 Jul 2010 14:13
CMRoyalSun Tzu If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
I didn't say that though, did I? I said "they lack the pace and height to be a truly great team". In other words, because they are not particularly pacy (especially when Torres isn't playing) they can't very often get in behind defences on the end of killer passes or to get decent crosses in. .
by CMRoyal » 12 Jul 2010 14:24
Rev Algenon Stickleback HCMRoyalSun Tzu If you say lack of height means they aren't a great team
I didn't say that though, did I? I said "they lack the pace and height to be a truly great team". In other words, because they are not particularly pacy (especially when Torres isn't playing) they can't very often get in behind defences on the end of killer passes or to get decent crosses in. .
You don't think the fact that they play a style of play which isn't English, and doesn't rely on running past fullbacks for a big bloke to nod in at the far post, might have something to do with that?
But yeah, that close-control, pass and move into space style they have really limits them.
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 12 Jul 2010 14:26
bigmike A great team would have won at least one of their games in this tournament by more than 1 goal that was scored in the latter stages of the game.
by sandman » 12 Jul 2010 16:46
Nick Shorey my Lord!bigmike A great team would have won at least one of their games in this tournament by more than 1 goal that was scored in the latter stages of the game.
This is grade A rubbish. It doesn't matter how many goals you win by, because you don't win by the volume of goals, you just need to score one more than your opponent; dem de rulez.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests