by theacademic » 15 Aug 2013 09:02
by Fox Talbot » 15 Aug 2013 13:44
by SLAMMED » 15 Aug 2013 19:27
theacademic Whilst I am analysing the results
by theacademic » 20 Sep 2013 08:40
by Badger Finger » 20 Sep 2013 09:45
SLAMMEDtheacademic Whilst I am analysing the results
Give us the fucking results!
by Alexander Litvinenko » 20 Sep 2013 10:43
by Franchise FC » 20 Sep 2013 11:33
by Franchise FC » 20 Sep 2013 11:36
Alexander Litvinenko Poorly thought-through questions, if you don't mind me saying so.....
You ask in Q1 : "Was Havelange an extraordinary individual who took bribes, or was he a true representative of an organization that is endemically corrupt?"
The reality is that he is part of an organisation where the top layers of management are corrupt but those at lower levels certainly aren't, and are genuinely working for the good of the game - but I can't see how to answer that with the options given.
by Very near...far away » 21 Sep 2013 03:07
by Pepe the Horseman » 21 Sep 2013 10:21
by SLAMMED » 22 Sep 2013 01:43
theacademic Ok, SLAMMED.. The results are shared if you leave your email address.
by Green » 22 Sep 2013 11:44
by theacademic » 27 Oct 2013 07:54
by theacademic » 07 Nov 2013 07:23
by Green » 07 Nov 2013 10:14
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 53 guests