philMTBM and the message said...............
The message called Campbell a big f****** n*****
He's only 5 ft 8
by Ferris » 15 Nov 2011 08:45
philMTBM and the message said...............
The message called Campbell a big f****** n*****
by DelBoyRodders » 15 Nov 2011 12:32
by Silver Fox » 15 Nov 2011 16:33
by Hoop Blah » 15 Nov 2011 16:39
by Extended-Phenotype » 17 Nov 2011 16:08
by cmonurz » 17 Nov 2011 16:11
Extended-Phenotype A bit late to the conversation, I know. But I don't give a shit really.
Hoop Blah / No Fixed Abode:
The idea behind ‘fat cnut’ is to insinuate there is something wrong with being fat.
Likewise, the idea behind ‘black cnut’ is to insinuate there is something wrong with being black.
The motive behind the insult, i.e. whether you meant to work somebody up, or genuinely carry the belief, is completely irrelevant. It’s a racist slur, and if you feel comfortable using them, you are a racist.
So personally, I hope you both catch some sort of wasting disease.
Ian Royal:
‘Black’ maybe descriptive, but when used as a derogatory term the connotations and associations are with racial prejudice. The same with idiot Sun readers who excuse terms like "Pak*" a simple abbreviation. The subtext of that word is not taken to be an abbreviation. It’s a word that hurts and stirs fear and pain, because it is associated with hatred.
Whatever you regard as justifiable language, what we are talking about here is the ‘dialogue of the racist’. If you do not agree with racists, refrain from using or mitigating their terminology.
by Hoop Blah » 17 Nov 2011 18:07
by FiNeRaIn » 17 Nov 2011 18:13
cmonurz Difficult to disagree with any of that, EP.
.
by cmonurz » 17 Nov 2011 18:49
FiNeRaIncmonurz Difficult to disagree with any of that, EP.
.
really? Stopped readng when he started wishing a " wasting disease" on a poster on a football forum.
by FiNeRaIn » 17 Nov 2011 19:40
by Compo's Hat » 17 Nov 2011 23:10
by Silver Fox » 18 Nov 2011 08:45
by cmonurz » 18 Nov 2011 08:58
by Extended-Phenotype » 18 Nov 2011 10:50
No Fixed Abode
Look, its the PC brigade.
Hoop Blah EP, I get where your coming from but of my motive is to bait the recipient of my abuse then it's topic doesn't mean I subscribe to any preconceived ideals around that character or physical trait.
If I get the reaction I want then that's all I'm interested in at that point. I'm not saying that's a nice thing to do, but sometimes it's been the reality of the situation. It doesn't mean I'm going to limit opportunities or pre-judge someone on the basis of the topic I've abused them on.
FiNeRaIn
really? Stopped readng when he started wishing a " wasting disease" on a poster on a football forum.
by cmonurz » 18 Nov 2011 10:56
by Hoop Blah » 18 Nov 2011 11:28
by Extended-Phenotype » 18 Nov 2011 16:15
by Hoop Blah » 18 Nov 2011 16:38
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 91 guests