by Big Foot » 15 Apr 2012 22:35
by 3 veesinarow » 15 Apr 2012 23:07
TheMaraudingDog Well you're hardly going to have queues of Scousers admitting to (tick applicable boxes)
Entrance without a ticket
Going to wrong section
Pushing from the back to get in
Fighting police who were trying to stop crush
Jumping over people to get in
etc etc
by Dare to Dr£am » 16 Apr 2012 07:53
TheMaraudingDog Well you're hardly going to have queues of Scousers admitting to (tick applicable boxes)
Entrance without a ticket
Going to wrong section
Pushing from the back to get in
Fighting police who were trying to stop crush
Jumping over people to get in
etc etc
by LWJ » 16 Apr 2012 09:07
Friday's Legacypostwhisperer quoting the taylor report doesnt really help an argument. load of bollox written to appease scousers frothing at the mouth for blood
I'm sure neither you or the wum can be bothered, but if you took the time to watch/listen to the witness accounts of the events of that day you will see that that is an accurate statement of events.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 16 Apr 2012 11:48
lowerwestjnr Er the police failed because they opened the gates, but only because there was a crush outside, and the Liverpool fans (some drunk, some not, some without tickets some with) piled in. Then pushed into one pen even though it was full. When you are waiting for a tube, and the carriage gets full so you can't get through the door, do you pile in, or find another carriage?
by Wimb » 16 Apr 2012 12:26
Rev Algenon Stickleback Hlowerwestjnr Er the police failed because they opened the gates, but only because there was a crush outside, and the Liverpool fans (some drunk, some not, some without tickets some with) piled in. Then pushed into one pen even though it was full. When you are waiting for a tube, and the carriage gets full so you can't get through the door, do you pile in, or find another carriage?
You've never been in a big crowd in a confined space, I take it?
The people at the back of the crush would have had no sense of the pressure up ahead. It's why people die in cushes. It's not as if those at the back would have been pushing like crazy. Given the right conditions, and enough people, even a mild force gets amplified when you have people so close that they can't move, and can't control their movements.
by handbags_harris » 16 Apr 2012 13:16
Rev Algenon Stickleback Hlowerwestjnr Er the police failed because they opened the gates, but only because there was a crush outside, and the Liverpool fans (some drunk, some not, some without tickets some with) piled in. Then pushed into one pen even though it was full. When you are waiting for a tube, and the carriage gets full so you can't get through the door, do you pile in, or find another carriage?
You've never been in a big crowd in a confined space, I take it?
The people at the back of the crush would have had no sense of the pressure up ahead. It's why people die in cushes. It's not as if those at the back would have been pushing like crazy. Given the right conditions, and enough people, even a mild force gets amplified when you have people so close that they can't move, and can't control their movements.
by T.R.O.L.I. » 16 Apr 2012 15:43
handbags_harris If you've ever walked through the middle tunnel of the Leppings Lane End then you very quickly begin to understand just how a crush can develop in such a short space of time.
by Extended-Phenotype » 16 Apr 2012 15:44
by RobRoyal » 16 Apr 2012 15:53
by Royal With Cheese » 16 Apr 2012 16:05
by Friday's Legacy » 16 Apr 2012 16:07
Extended-Phenotype I think if you are going to comment with any authority on this matter, you really need to understand 2 things.
1. In a human crush, the application of pressure is minimal at the back of the crowd but amplifies exponentially towards the front. It is impossible for those at the back to appreciate what minimal pressure is doing to those at the front.
2. The reason that the liability of Liverpool fans is being eased, is that they didn’t react or behave in a manor any different to any crowd, a behaviour which is studied and understood by most people who manage them. They really shouldn’t be thought of in these contexts as “Liverpool fans”, but as “people”.
Football crowds consist of people who don’t want to miss the game, who may have had a drink, who may not have bought tickets and who are subject to the same herd behaviour and crush factors as any other crowd of people.
You only have to look through history to see the thousands of examples of human crushes from all walks of life, be it football or other sports, rock concerts, train stations, airports, festivals and carnivals – events where crowds consist of people just like Hillsborough, to see there is nothing special about the Liverpool fans that day.
Those in charge are supposed to be qualified in dealing with crowds of people and accounting for these characteristics in their plans and actions.
The Liverpool fans behaved like people, in a crowd.
The authorities behaved negligently, before, during and after, leading to the deaths of 96 people, and then tried to cover it up.
I’m not sure why anybody is concerning themselves with blaming Liverpool fans, i.e. people – you, me, your folks and friends, along with the good and the bad in any cross-section of society, for a disaster which would have been avoided if managed competently.
I’m not sure what point anybody who overlooks this is trying to make.
Big Foot Can't w8 to see 40,000 Scousers baying for 40,000 Chelsea at the final, incensed by the chanting and booing today
by RobRoyal » 16 Apr 2012 21:50
No Fixed AbodeBig Foot Can't w8 to see 40,000 Scousers baying for 40,000 Chelsea at the final, incensed by the chanting and booing today
FA were partly to blame for that minute silence debacle yesterday, making it a 6pm kick off.
by The Prisoner » 16 Apr 2012 23:30
by Blue Hooped Moose » 17 Apr 2012 07:34
by 3 veesinarow » 17 Apr 2012 08:18
by The Prisoner » 17 Apr 2012 08:27
Blue Hooped Moose Nice post Prisoner.
In terms of moving on and gaining closure do you think Liverpool should continue to not play games on the 15th April?
by Royal With Cheese » 17 Apr 2012 08:33
The PrisonerBlue Hooped Moose Nice post Prisoner.
In terms of moving on and gaining closure do you think Liverpool should continue to not play games on the 15th April?
I agree with them not playing on that date out of respect for the victims, but sooner or later it was going to cause an innocent team a problem as we saw with Chelsea and their none-too-gracious fans at the weekend.
My argument above was that the hysteria and aura surrounding Hillsborough needs to be addressed by the authorities - the tragic loss of life, regardless of any of the surrounding feelings, dictates that the date is kept free for the right reasons.
RobRoyalNo Fixed AbodeBig Foot Can't w8 to see 40,000 Scousers baying for 40,000 Chelsea at the final, incensed by the chanting and booing today
FA were partly to blame for that minute silence debacle yesterday, making it a 6pm kick off.
![]()
Nice one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 55 guests