soggy biscuit Flamengo say Zico scored 89 goals in 1979 so Messi is yet to break the record.
Who the f*** has calendar year records anyway??
Messi now on 90....
by Big Foot » 17 Dec 2012 09:03
soggy biscuit Flamengo say Zico scored 89 goals in 1979 so Messi is yet to break the record.
Who the f*** has calendar year records anyway??
by soggy biscuit » 17 Dec 2012 09:41
by SPARTA » 27 Dec 2012 18:20
by SLAMMED » 27 Dec 2012 18:41
by Den-Rus » 27 Dec 2012 18:53
SPARTA http://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/la-liga-russian-side-offered-205m-messi-101522470.html
"Barca accept £205m bid from an unnamed Russian club, but they want him to stay." The Russian club also offered him £24.6m annual pay packet after tax. Mental.
by LWJ » 28 Dec 2012 12:13
by sandman » 30 Dec 2012 01:22
SLAMMED Don't all players in Spain have a release clause in their contracts? Ronaldo's is something ridiculous.
But it's the players decision and he will never leave Barca.
by Deadlock » 30 Dec 2012 01:38
SLAMMED Don't all players in Spain have a release clause in their contracts? Ronaldo's is something ridiculous.
But it's the players decision and he will never leave Barca.
by frimmers3 » 30 Dec 2012 10:24
LWJ he is 10/1 with Ladbrokes to score under 60 goals next year, if he gets injured could be a good shout, or alternatively 8/1 to score over a 100
by soggy biscuit » 30 Dec 2012 10:26
frimmers3LWJ he is 10/1 with Ladbrokes to score under 60 goals next year, if he gets injured could be a good shout, or alternatively 8/1 to score over a 100
could you explain how i could make a substantial bet now,on both circumstances? seems impossible to lose.
by frimmers3 » 30 Dec 2012 10:28
by LWJ » 30 Dec 2012 14:00
frimmers3LWJ he is 10/1 with Ladbrokes to score under 60 goals next year, if he gets injured could be a good shout, or alternatively 8/1 to score over a 100
could you explain how i could make a substantial bet now,on both circumstances? seems impossible to lose.
by cmonurz » 30 Dec 2012 14:18
frimmers3 you would lay the middle ground off.
by frimmers3 » 31 Dec 2012 19:52
cmonurzfrimmers3 you would lay the middle ground off.
If you lay 60-100, then you'd lose twice.
by Royal Rother » 31 Dec 2012 21:01
by frimmers3 » 31 Dec 2012 21:06
Royal Rother There's something missing here.
by RobRoyal » 01 Jan 2013 17:37
frimmers3cmonurzfrimmers3 you would lay the middle ground off.
If you lay 60-100, then you'd lose twice.
not if either of the first two bets come in at those odds.
by frimmers3 » 01 Jan 2013 18:28
by cmonurz » 01 Jan 2013 18:30
by frimmers3 » 01 Jan 2013 18:30
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests